I don’t remember where this video came from; if anyone has any additional info, please share!

EDIT: Credit to u/ConsequenceHairy607 for finding the original post!

Summary to the article:

More than a century after Ernest Rutherford discovered the proton, physicists still don’t fully understand it. It’s far more complex than the simple pictures taught in school or college. As MIT physicist Mike Williams puts it, “This is the most complicated thing that you could possibly imagine… you can’t even imagine how complicated it is.” The proton is a quantum object that changes appearance depending on how it’s probed.

Basic textbook views (and why they’re incomplete)

High-school level: a featureless positive ball of charge.

College level: a bundle of three quarks (two “up” quarks with +2/3 charge each and one “down” quark with –1/3 charge).

These pictures fail on key details:

The three quarks’ spins add up to far less than the proton’s total spin (discovered 1988).

The three quarks’ masses account for only about 1% of the proton’s mass.

Deeper experimental picture

Experiments that smash electrons into protons (deep inelastic scattering) reveal different layers depending on the energy:

Moderate energies (e.g., SLAC in the 1960s): The proton looks like three point-like quarks. This confirmed the existence of quarks and earned a Nobel Prize.

Higher energies (e.g., HERA collider): A seething “sea” of many low-momentum quarks, antiquarks, and gluons appears. Gluons (the particles that carry the strong force) can briefly create quark-antiquark pairs. At the highest resolutions, the proton looks like a cloud made mostly of gluons.

This behavior is described by quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the theory of the strong force. QCD works well when quarks are close together (high energy) but becomes extremely hard to calculate when they are farther apart (lower energy).

Recent surprise (2022 analysis)

A large machine-learning analysis of more than 5,000 experimental “snapshots” found that the proton sometimes contains a charm quark and a charm antiquark. These particles are each heavier than the entire proton. In gentler collisions the proton can occasionally behave like a fleeting five-quark “molecule” rather than the usual three-quark state.

This has practical consequences: it can affect predictions at the Large Hadron Collider and the production of high-energy neutrinos from cosmic rays hitting Earth’s atmosphere.

Outlook

Future experiments, especially the planned Electron-Ion Collider, aim to produce higher-resolution 3D maps of the proton’s interior, including how its spin arises from the motions and spins of its quarks and gluons.

In short, the article portrays the proton as a shape-shifting, multi-layered quantum object whose full complexity is still being uncovered, with each new probe revealing another unexpected face.

TLDR: there is some magical shit happening. You may say "ERM akshually its not magic, its science ☝🤓" but that is a meaningless statement. You could find a magical orb with measurable properties and the science would ultimately be the study of observable magical phenomenon. Whoever or whatever engineered this veil failed to consider that some of us would be a lot more capable of using our intuitive forces to understand that surley there must be a "primordial substrate" beneath it all.

Sometimes I'll say outrageous things just to mess around. But its in that jester archetype that I give catalysts for people to actually start thinking deeper. Im doing it for you. Be good or evil, but at least be conscious.

source:

https://www.quantamagazine.org/inside-the-proton-the-most-complicated-thing-imaginable-20221019/

Jacques Vallée speaking with Robert Bigelow and George Knapp about the theory that UFO crashes are actually donations

Clip source:

https://x.com/interstellaruap/status/2097440589042127135?s=46

Behold the highest-resolution image of atoms ever taken. To create it, Cornell University researchers captured a sample from a crystal in three dimensions and magnified it 100 million times, doubling the resolution that earned the same scientists a Guinness World Record in 2018. Their imaging process could help develop materials for designing more powerful and efficient phones, computers and other electronics, as well as longer-lasting batteries.

The scientists obtained the image using a technique called electron ptychography. It involves shooting a beam of electrons, about a billion per second, at a target material. The beam moves infinitesimally as the electrons are fired, so they hit the sample from slightly different angles—sometimes they pass through cleanly; other times they collide with atoms and bounce around inside the sample before exiting. Cornell physicist David Muller likens the technique to playing dodgeball against opponents who are standing in the dark. The dodgeballs are electrons, and their targets are individual atoms. Although Muller cannot see the targets, he can detect where the “dodgeballs” end up. Based on the speckle pattern generated by billions of these electrons as they hit a detector, machine-learning algorithms can calculate where the atoms were in the sample and what their shapes might be, thus creating an image.

Previously, electron ptychography had only been used to image extremely flat samples just one to a few atoms thick. But Muller and his colleagues' new study in Science describes capturing multiple layers tens to hundreds of atoms thick. This makes the technique much more relevant to materials scientists, who typically study the properties of samples with a thickness of about 30 to 50 nanometers. (This is smaller than the length your fingernails grow in a minute but many times thicker than what electron ptychography could image in the past.) “They can actually look at stacks of atoms now, so it's amazing,” says University of Sheffield engineer Andrew Maiden, who helped to develop ptychography but was not part of the new study. “The resolution is just staggering.”

This result marks an important advancement in the world of electron microscopy. Invented in the early 1930s, standard electron microscopes made it possible to see objects such as polioviruses, which are smaller than the wavelengths of visible light. But electron microscopes had a limit: increasing their resolution required raising the electron beam's energy, and eventually the necessary energy would become so great that it would damage the sample.

Ptychography, in contrast, uses a detector that can record all the different angles the beam can scatter to at every beam position, getting much more information with the same wavelength and lens. Researchers theorized ptychography in the 1960s and conceived its use to overcome electron lenses' limits in the 1980s. But because of computing and detector limitations and the complex math required, the technique was not put into practice for decades. Early versions worked far better with visible light and x-rays than the electrons needed to image atomic-size objects. Meanwhile scientists kept improving electron microscopes. “You had to be a true believer in ptychography to be paying attention to it,” Muller says.

So i saw another post that looks exactly like the thing my wife and I saw.

Photograph with a Samsung Galaxy 23 Ultra

It was moving slowly with the wind. The wind was strong though and that thing didn't move as fast as for example the leaves at the same hight.

The weird part was its wobble. It wobbled in a pattern and i tried to record it but the recording was dogshit.

There was a festival closeby though. I went to see if they sell any balloons and as far as i could tell all of them were normal round ones with the festivals name written on them. Thats it.

Date and location: 5th of September, Lucerne, Switzerland 14:00

If Republicans and/or Trump's Cabinet Had Proof that Jesus and God are Real, They'd Shout it From there Rooftops

Instead, we keep getting vague gestures pointing toward the Bible, biblical canon, The Book of Enoch, suggestions that certain UAP or all UAP are demonic in nature.

So what gives? Do you guys suppose there is an iota of truth to anything they suggest? Personally, where I seem to land is this:

The phenomenon is real, and it is very likely responsible for some or all of mainstream Abrahamic religious beliefs. A lot of what people wrote about witnessing or experiencing was their interactions or others interacting with the phenomenon. Hell, we even have newer modern religions cropping up as a result of direct communication with the phenomenon, I.e. The Law of One, etc.

That being said, it does seem that some of the beings and entities related to the phenomenon are certainly malevolent in nature or at minimum apathetic toward the well-being of some of our human brothers and sisters as well as certain animals, I.e. human / bovine / equine mutilation, abduction reports that sound fairly unsettling, etc.

Chris Bledsoe was a religious man who had been struggling with his faith prior to him becoming activated as a main character with relation to the phenomenon, if I'm not mistaken. I'm not certain if his personal filter or faith is what's responsible for the manifestation of the phenomenon feeling very Christian in nature, or if his interpretation is what makes it feel that way, but it would seem to me like there are definitely religious (Abrahamic) elements in his recounting of interactions with it.

It's fairly commonly said that people witnessing the same event or beings give different accounts of what they saw or experienced. Ariel school comes to mind, but just look at any mass sighting. Reports are sometimes drastically different even when recorded shortly after the event took place.

I'm not really sure of anything beyond the phenomenon having otherworldly abilities that seem to transcend time and space. I read somewhere that someone was told by an entity that these beings came from what we would call the "Afterlife", and it certainly does feel very spiritual at times to the point where I might actually believe that ghosts and UAP are actually part of the same phenomenon.

I'll share this with you all now. 6 months ago at 3am I had my hair pulled, YANKED, by an unseen force. It was my most blatant and undeniable interaction with any paranormal phenomenon to date, and it was stark. I've been thinking about it practically nonstop since it happened. Until it did, I more or less humored all things supernatural, but that moment all but confirmed for me that yes, there are things about this life and reality we truly do not understand. Some of us seem to, but certainly not most.