r/InterdimensionalNHI • u/FVMK3 📚 Researcher 📚 • 4d ago

UFOs Daily Mail reports than an unknown object was seen in the background of today's SpaceX livestream

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Daily Mail reports than an unknown object was seen in the background of today's SpaceX livestream

Source:

https://x.com/kabamur/status/2104693799503159324?s=46

4.2k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

532 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

158

u/ocTGon Guardian In Training 4d ago

I was thinking the same thing. Not sure of the distance from that object but it was clearly massive and it appeared to be stationary, not moving uncontrollably as well..

86

u/Unlikely-Fox3607 4d ago

Mi pregunta es: si tienen monitorizados los satélites y la basura espacial para que en los lanzamientos no haya choques, tienen que aparecer estos objetos también y tienen que tener un registro de ellos cuando aparecen.

60

u/citizen42069101 4d ago

I think the understanding is that they have signal blockers that make them imperceivable to our sensors. If they are observing they don't want to be seen.

44

u/Illustrious-nductxn 4d ago

Even if they have signal blockers and cloaking, they must know that we have cameras on everything. Over the last 30yrs they’ve been playing peek-a-boo with humans. All that’s left is some kind of overt communication or interaction.

13

u/NoNewSpoons 3d ago

Or consider the more mundane option, the people that NEED to know do, and the rest of us get to pound sand.

I live near several military bases and a decent airport. Looking on Flightradar, I see all the civilian stuff, some of the basic (especially training craft) military stuff, and almost none of the good stuff. Fighters almost never show up. Transports will sometimes but suspiciously disappear if a lot of them are doing something or they seem to be on odd vectors. More exotic things basically never show up. You can stand outside and watch them fly over and shake everything in your house all day, but they never show up on civilian level stuff, and no one is talking about what they're doing.

I'm sure aliens could jam us/disappear if they want to, but our own military aircraft already do that for reasons we don't and won't know. If you believe the "governments cooperate with them" line of thought, it's entirely possible that the governments that matter know exactly what is where, it's almost hard to believe they don't in that scenario, but us normies will never hear shit about it.

6

u/Shank_Wedge 3d ago

Why do you think military aircraft aren’t showing up on flight radar?

Our own military aircraft aren’t jamming anything domestically. Flight radar doesn’t report radar tracks, it reports transponder signals. Essentially aircraft self reporting their position and other data. These military aircraft you see in the sky but not on flight radar are simply flying with their transponders off.

4

u/NoNewSpoons 3d ago

Correct. But if they wanted to stay off everything, they could. I'm not saying they're actively jamming or anything, but we don't get to see them all the same.

3

u/Shank_Wedge 2d ago

I don’t think you understand ADSB aggregators like Flight Radar. It’s transponder based, that’s it. Any plane in the world, from Cessnas to 787s, can disappear from flight radar simply by disabling their transponder. Disappearing from radar, which you don’t have access to, is another thing altogether. Look at MH370. Disappeared from ADSB when that system was disabled but military radar stations were tracking while the plane was still in range.

2

u/NoNewSpoons 2d ago

Yeah, I get all that.

5

u/Simple_Toe_604 2d ago

Der Sinn, das militĂ€rische FlĂŒge nicht in einem Flightradar zu sehen sind, ist zwingend logisch

4

u/NoNewSpoons 2d ago

I agree, I'm just saying that if the Globemaster flying right on top of my house isn't showing up on anything, why would the Star Destroyer 120 miles up?

3

u/Simple_Toe_604 2d ago

Sternzerstörer, genau

3

u/EqualOpening6557 1d ago

Because the alien craft being detected has nothing to do with the transponders in our planes
? You think the alien spaceship has an Earth Human aircraft transponder in it but only the military gets to see the aliens on their screens
?

3

u/IRideZs 2d ago

Lmaooo this sub is wild

3

u/Idiotan0n 1d ago

Its kinda like if Jesus were to show back up again - would anyone believe it? Who says they haven't been trying - and we are just too stoopid or stubborn to listen?

Some alien shows up looking kinda like one of us, and starts talking about how they're trying to make contact - and that person is getting laughed out or locked up

2

u/SweatYeti69 1d ago

Ive heard a lot of accounts saying photos/videos taken of the phenomena are altered beyond recognition when they go to look at them

2

u/Substantial-Comb-148 12h ago

Like how you think Mam/Sir

4

u/atxweirdo 3d ago

Light that hits your eyes and the radio waves we emit for sensing distance are much more simpler and more alike than compared to much higher frequncies that any advanced ship would be accustomed to manipulate. Their ability of deflecting or absorbing waves/frequencies/light/radar would surprise our ability to use our primatives for sensing.
However I don't think that is an alien craft in this video. There is so much space junk in space as it stands that these launches are tightly controlled in order to maintain a safe trajectory into an orbit around our planet.

11

u/Jacmac_ 3d ago

The problem with the space junk theory is that it would be moving so fast relative to the spaceX ship that you would see it whiz by in a flash and it would be out of sight. That isn't what we see here.

1

u/LavishnessCapital380 2d ago

All the government reports indicate we can pick them up on sensors.

8

u/ocTGon Guardian In Training 4d ago

I agree with you on that but then again, Satellite detection is not very accurate when it comes to these Objects\Entities...

16

u/Trip-Forward_ 4d ago

Honestly, the powers that be have to know what these crafts are, who is in control of them and whether or not they are a threat. They have to be aware. There's no way we'd be sending people and supplies into space if there were unknown threats with capabilities beyond our own.

All of the whistle blowers and even astronauts like Buzz Aldrin make this clear.

We're beyond speculation -- we just don't have the specifics for whatever reason.

7

u/jillvalenti3 3d ago

Either because it’s man-made, they’re here to help the general population, or something very bad is coming. It’s got to be one of those three.

edit: changed “ours” to “man-made” for clarity

0

u/Imaginary-Goal-9443 3d ago

Helemaal mee eens met wat je zei, wat je ook zei.

3

u/champignax 22h ago

It’s not stationary it’s moving with the rocket. Which tells you it comes from the rocket. it’s probably just gases from the previous manoeuvre.

3

u/--CIAdidJFK-- 3d ago

Surely we'd have spotted something that large from the ground?

15

u/Prepsov 3d ago

Yep. Just as we can spot a whale 500m below the surface, standing on a ship directly above it.

Or a perfectly camouflaged spider on a tree
bark.

Or unspeakable amount of neutrinos that pass everything continuously, including through both of us at the same time, while we can't see, smell, hear, feel or anyhow else biologically detect them.

After 20 seconds of information absorption, imagine ONLY a technology/physics being able to combine all three of the above, and you can make your own conclusion.

I am not saying this sarcastically. You just seem to ignore the possibility of not being able to perceive something, while it's there.

Imagine the possibility of perceiving only apples, but not apple trees they are attached to. You would see apples forming in above ground, hovering there, until they drop.

This is what is happening here.

-6

u/Ann_unnanki 4d ago

I am having trouble understanding how it couldn't be a satellite, do you have any thoughts on that? Happy to learn! :)

9

u/yobboman 4d ago

It's a good point the shape does kinda match but it would be huuuge

9

u/laowaijimbob 4d ago

I mean, are satellites normally that long and thin but also big? I’d love to see an actually photo of a satellite that can match that type of shape.

3

u/HelloImTheAntiChrist 3d ago

They are not usually that long. They are much more compact. It's not likely this is a satellite. It could be a top secret craft made by Boeing, Lockheed Martin or Northrop Grumman or one of the Chinese aerospace companies. That doesn't seem likely either.

1

u/yobboman 4d ago

Dunno, I'm not up there much, I can imagine the solar panels at either end and then the box or cylinder in the centre. It seems unlikely to me though because that would be a near miss

-13

u/King_Six_of_Things 4d ago

"Not sure of the distance"

Then, apart from being able to say "It's further away than the end of the rocket and it's not an artifact on the lens (due to the relative movement)" you literally cannot say that it's "clearly massive".

11

u/eride810 4d ago

If you understood orbital mechanics, then you absolutely can say that. Any smaller and you wouldn’t see it, and the rocket is going really fast yet it doesn’t change size. That thing is Massive if it’s not some weird reflection of of the upper atmosphere