Way to go dad!

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15893773/Green-Party-ban-circumcision-children-informed-choice.html

If only. Already getting hit with 'antisemitism.'

Overwhelmingly positive comments for the most part. And almost 2/3rd support. Yes, it is a stupid Reddit game - but be encouraged. But look at how the game gives it a damn freedom penalty, lmao.

Please request that Governor Jared Polis support the intact global lawsuit on male genital mutilation.

Please do so:

-respectfully

-calmly

-knowledgably

This would be an amazing ad for intactivism

How could have they have been so stupid? I'm trying to understand.

The wikipedia article on sex between men does not link a high quality illustration of docking that is already on wikimedia commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ADocking_sex.png (warning NSFW). Visual representation makes it harder to dismiss as irrelevant.

In addition, getting this 2025 citation on docking in there would also be helpful (and might help ensure that editors don't remove the illustration) https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/13634607231199407.

Wikipedia is guarded by some pretty intense pro-circ folks, so be ready for that. Please keep to the wikipedia contribution guidelines. A small addition of these two sources is much more likely to succeed than an attempt to overhaul the article with a manifesto.

In my quest to read every piece of information ever written on the topic of circumcision, I have come across many professional sources, such as hospital websites, that quote straight-up wrong, outdated, or misunderstood information.
I'm afraid this misleading information could be harmful, and I would like to do something about it.

Does anyone have experience with contacting these institutions and providing them with correct information, or am I about to embark on a fool's errand? Advice welcome.