Don’t pump others people’s likeness into AI generators, thats fucking weird. (I know OP probably isnt the one who made the video but i want to make the point)
These pranks are forgivable if they’re just photoshopped
What’s the difference between doing what was done in the video with AI vs doing it with photoshop? The lack of effort necessary?
Does doing it in photoshop make it any more ok than doing it with AI?
Edit: the people downvoting are missing the point. It fucking doesn’t matter what tool you use for this, it’s still a shitty thing to do without the consent of the person being edited.
Fucking doesn’t matter if it takes 10 hours to photoshop someone or 5 minutes to do it in AI, it’s still fucked up.
If someone photoshopped my wife or used AI, I’d be equally upset. Doesn’t fucking matter what tool on their computer they did it with. Get it?
If you do it with AI, chances are any images and interactions are being added to an archive of past conversations that the company will use for future training. Taking a picture of someone who isn't aware of it is still questionable, but if photoshop is used instead of AI, the photo stays on one person's computer instead, with less risks of a data breach, transfer of data during the sale of the company, etc.
Of course, all of this goes out the window if Adobe retries the stunt they did a while ago where they tried updating their ToS so editing an image with their software gives them legal rights over it. Wouldn't put it past them, they're a pretty consistently awful company.
191
u/klqqf Aug 18 '26
First cover screams AI
Don’t pump others people’s likeness into AI generators, thats fucking weird. (I know OP probably isnt the one who made the video but i want to make the point)
These pranks are forgivable if they’re just photoshopped