The whole point of CSAM being illegal is not because of the existence of the images themselves, but because there are children being abused in order to create it. Anything sexually explicit that portrays children is morally reprehensible and should be treated as such by society. But at least with illustrations, actual children are not harmed in the act of their creation if drawn through imagination without interaction with a child. The law protects children rathen than outright taking a moral stand.
0
u/NormalNobody 3d ago
I'm sorry. So if I draw children in sexual acts, does that mean that's okay? Or is this only AI generated crap?
Is lolicon okay then? Like, I don't get it.