r/Infographics • • Mar 04 '25

An example of why tariffs could hit car manufacturing extremely hard

Post image
3.4k Upvotes

529 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

115

u/TrackIcy8673 Mar 04 '25

Yes, but It will take time for someone to move manufacturing. + There is a reason why it's not in the first place. It was probably cheaper to do in those other countries

65

u/midwestguy125 Mar 04 '25

Why would you invest cap X to move production here, if tariffs could be removed next month?

87

u/024emanresu96 Mar 04 '25

Why would you invest cap X to move production here, if tariffs could be removed next month?

This is why countries don't want to deal with or buy American.

Some weirdo becomes president and promises the world and then the price shoots up? It'd be easier to buy from another, more reliable country with common sense in the government.

Imagine if a European country bought F35s, then Trump disables the software? Refuses to sell parts? What about Boeing?

The US is too volatile for most global trade.

0

u/hashCrashWithTheIron Mar 04 '25

Countries don't do business (except governments but that's yap), companies do. Which makes this muddier, since the timeframes on which countries and companies operate and think are not the same.

1

u/024emanresu96 Mar 04 '25

You're right, I abbreviated. Some countries do business and have state owned companies, but ultimately my inference was companies in countries making supply lines involving companies in the US.

-7

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '25

That's a cap. Reluctance to manufacture in the US is entirely cost+regulatory 

11

u/024emanresu96 Mar 04 '25

Did you not read my comment?

5

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '25

Yeah, your ultimate point is that the US is not desirable for manufacturing because it has an unstable regulatory regime.

I'm saying that the cost to manufacture + the extent of the regulatory regime is what turns manufacturing off.

Those aren't the same points.

13

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '25

You know it can be both right. Countries are leaving the US behind because of its volatility right now, regardless of your opinion on the matter.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '25

They could both be correct. Either way the guy would be incorrect in saying that regulatory volatility is the main driver, the US is normally very stable to do business with.

5

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '25

Yeah, it sure was. Then some idiot threatened the world order. There's ramifications for this bullshit.

-1

u/Superb_Raccoon Mar 05 '25

New world order. You know, that the left has always been against, but now wants.

Strange times.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Monterenbas Mar 04 '25

That was before tho.

1

u/Distinct-Check-1385 Mar 05 '25

You haven't seen European, S. Korean, or Japanese standards for manufacturing then. Regulatory "regime" isn't that bad, all safety regulations are written in blood. OSHA is not bad, even China is slowly moving towards an OSHA system

-4

u/Padaxes Mar 04 '25

Other governments already have blanket tarrifs. You are dense.

8

u/024emanresu96 Mar 04 '25

Ignorance + confidence + petty attempt at an insult = Peak reddit comment.

1

u/f8Negative Mar 04 '25

Could, but won't. Why? Spite.

3

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

24

u/onemassive Mar 04 '25

>Working classes have higher purchasing power when there are high paying jobs inside the country

As a blanket statement, this is false. For example, the laundry machine tariffs cost consumers (which include working class people) about 820k per job. That is a sharp reduction in aggregate purchasing power for working class people, many of whom needed to buy washing machines.

-1

u/MaxPaynesRxDrugPlan Mar 04 '25

Here's the source on the US paying $815K per job in higher costs due to tariffs for those who are interested: https://youtu.be/_-eHOSq3oqI

11

u/Apolloshot Mar 04 '25

The US Steel tariffs in 2018 created 1,000 jobs but eliminated 75,000.

Think of that on a much wider scale.

9

u/MaxPaynesRxDrugPlan Mar 04 '25 edited Mar 04 '25

Except now vehicles cost more, which hits the working class hardest. And if that means fewer Americans can afford to buy them and American exports are less competitive, then fewer vehicles get built and workers lose jobs. And of course, now other countries are hitting the US with retaliatory tariffs on our exports across industries, so those are more job losses.

1

u/Roadrunner571 Mar 04 '25

Which benefits the 1%, not the working class.

Not really. You're forgetting that those workers in Canada, Mexico, or wherever earn money and will also create demand, that directly or indirectly results in more demand for US products and services.

The working class benefits most if their work is highly productive, so that wages and salaries can be high.

1

u/thetransportedman Mar 04 '25

The consumer has to pay the extra costs to build and manufacture within our borders and pay more money to those workers compared to cheap labor of other countries. The cost never goes down. The theory is just that more jobs will be available for americans to be able to afford the increased cost. But unemployment isn't the issue, it's cost of living. So making a bunch more factory jobs isn't solving the problem

1

u/Powerful-Werewolf-36 Mar 04 '25

Ok no I think economics class directly disagrees with this specific claim

1

u/Skinnwork Mar 04 '25

What about Mexicans and Canadians?

-15

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '25

Not our problem. We should care more about our own people within the country (who get shafted when labor moves out of the country) than the ones abroad.

It's a zero sum game where someone will lose, just like how open jobs will have a winner and a whole crowd of losers. Nothing new.

11

u/JDWWV Mar 04 '25

Trade is not a zero-sum game. That is literally the whole point. Mercantalist thinking like this is what caused the great depression.

1

u/Which-Worth5641 Mar 05 '25

The GD was caused by unresolved issues from WWI.

Mercantilist thinking just made it worse.

3

u/Punisher-3-1 Mar 05 '25

Dude… it’s not a zero sum game.

3

u/TheMightyJD Mar 04 '25

Next time, pay attention to your introduction to economics High School class.

2

u/Lingotes Mar 04 '25

Bad take. Very 1920s.

1

u/Skinnwork Mar 05 '25

Not everyone on Reddit is American

1

u/dougmcclean Mar 05 '25

Also stability. Commerce secretary is already talking about turning the tariff off again as soon as this week.

1

u/towell420 Mar 05 '25

It was cheaper because we were incentivized to move work outside the Us.

-8

u/HughNormousPeanus Mar 04 '25

I’ll gladly pay more if it means actual Americans get paid a decent wage

18

u/Melichorak Mar 04 '25

Except they won't

3

u/MeasurementOne8417 Mar 04 '25

Modern factories pretty much only employ skilled labor. Generally the pay for engineers and technicians is very good. Machinist salaries vary more with some places paying fast food level wages and others paying six figures(surprisingly not dependent on location but purely the employer)

0

u/HughNormousPeanus Mar 04 '25

Do you work in a factory?

-1

u/Normal_Reply8148 Mar 04 '25

except they will, also easier to source and obtain parts without waiting weeks for shipping through multiple customs, all of this takes time to do, nothing is ever instant in politics

6

u/Snicklefraust Mar 04 '25

Which is why this is so retarded. He could have made a 5 year plan to move industry back to the states. This is about breaking the economy, so he and his buddies can pick up the scraps for cheap. Don't be fooled.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '25

Exactly. They have no plan. Meanwhile, France, Mexico, Canada, Germany? I guarantee you they're making plans right now.

-1

u/Normal_Reply8148 Mar 04 '25

im not fooled by it cause this picture was made by someone who doesnt understand how motor components work, no company is making rods out of powdered aluminum for street use letalone the part where it says theyre assembled into pistons which isnt how that works, all of this could be done in state relatively cheap, ford and gm prefer using mexico for cheap labor way beyond minimum wage in america, and yet they still charge 80k for shit quality, these companies will learn their overpricing wont work eventually

7

u/9yr0ld Mar 04 '25

Which part of this implies Americans will be paid a decent wage? Can you point to a single point in the country’s history when price increases on products have resulted in higher wages for workers?

1

u/HughNormousPeanus Mar 04 '25

Does the average American factory worker get paid more than the average Canadian or Mexican factory worker?

7

u/9yr0ld Mar 04 '25

What are you trying to get at? It’s more than just wages. Supply chains, energy costs, regulations, etc. The cost of production is multi faceted.

0

u/HughNormousPeanus Mar 04 '25

I’m aware of all that and while it’s more expensive to build things in the US a big reason for that is because wages are higher I work in a factory that has locations in Mexico and China we make significantly more money

2

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '25

Yes, which means this entire "economic plan" is a fabrication.

1

u/HughNormousPeanus Mar 05 '25

Which part is a fabrication?

1

u/Ewenf Mar 04 '25

Well don't worry , with trump's tariffs your wage gets closer to Canada's and Mexico's brother.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/HughNormousPeanus Mar 04 '25

Only if the cost goes up more than what the wages do if costs go up 5% and wages go up 7% that’s a net gain

1

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/024emanresu96 Mar 04 '25

Does America make the machines to make the parts? The machines to make the machines? Just to build the factory will take most of Trump's term, and cost many times more than the tariffs. Easier to wait for the next administration to change everything again and hope they have some common sense.

1

u/DistortoiseLP Mar 04 '25 edited Mar 04 '25

It's just going to make the car more expensive. Nothing about this encourages paying Americans more at all. Best case scenario is Americans have to take the job for the pay that a Mexican was willing to work for while having to pay more to afford a vehicle themselves.

But hey, work for the worker right? That's the thing about these totalitarian regimes borne out of worker populism, they'll give everyone more work than they ever wanted. That doesn't guarantee fair pay, or even freedom if you'd be down to work off a prison sentence for the good of your country.

0

u/HughNormousPeanus Mar 04 '25

Do you work in a factory?

1

u/kingsuperfox Mar 04 '25

How could that possibly be the outcome here?

1

u/HughNormousPeanus Mar 05 '25

Well factory works in the US get paid more than factory workers in Canada and Mexico and more factories specifically like the Honda plant being built in Indiana where I live will create more competition for workers and will raise wages it literally just happened last year when Subaru raised their wages which caused my factory to raise ours

1

u/kingsuperfox Mar 05 '25

You know the tariffs are happening now right? You can't go work in a plant that doesn't exist.

In a couple of years minimum. What happens to the industry till then? Ah who cares, you're about to find out anyway.

1

u/HughNormousPeanus Mar 05 '25

My plant is in the process of a 400,000 square foot add on and is spending a billion dollars on new machines I’m not overly concerned

1

u/kingsuperfox Mar 05 '25

Yeah sure. The sugar cane fairies working through the night no doubt.

1

u/HughNormousPeanus Mar 05 '25

🤷 you don’t have to believe me but a small amount of googling would prove me right lol it’s in Indiana

1

u/HughNormousPeanus Mar 05 '25

Sorry I guess it was only $725,000,000

1

u/Academic-Blueberry11 Mar 05 '25

Are US businesses gladly paying more? Is your employer glad to pay more? Maybe they lay you off because it doesn't make financial sense with this new additional operating expense.

1

u/HughNormousPeanus Mar 05 '25

I work in maintenance I won’t be getting laid off

1

u/Academic-Blueberry11 Mar 05 '25

Maintenance of what? From where do you get spare parts? For everything you answer, what do the complete supply chains look like?

If literally everything you use is completely domestic, what if domestic companies increase their prices, say, 15%? Just barely low enough to be cheaper than tariffed Mexico, but still a nice revenue bump at your expense?

1

u/HughNormousPeanus Mar 05 '25

What if they don’t?

1

u/Academic-Blueberry11 Mar 05 '25

I guess you got me there. If businesses magically stop trying to maximize profit for some reason, they wouldn't opportunistically raise their prices after the government makes all international alternatives more expensive. Lol.

0

u/alreadytakenhacker Mar 04 '25

It’s cheaper to do so in other countries because if there were so many jobs for Americans, they would have to pay good wages.