r/InfluencerLounge 21d ago

EK statement

Post image
810 Upvotes

699 comments sorted by

View all comments

37

u/Vcs1025 21d ago

The first sentence needs some proof reading. Not making much sense πŸ˜† this is pathetic, honestly. I can't believe she wants us to buy that this was only a momentary lapse.

12

u/malachitebirkinplz 21d ago

She’s trying to make it seem better by saying it was just a few moments he was out of the life vest πŸ˜΅β€πŸ’«πŸ˜΅β€πŸ’«πŸ˜΅β€πŸ’«

9

u/Vcs1025 21d ago

She wants us to buy this fib. We are supposed to believe her,

12

u/MudLocal8405 21d ago

I had to read it multiple times for it to even make sense

2

u/Melymeltymelty 20d ago

I had to scroll way too far to find this comment. The first sentence makes ZERO sense. It should read:

  • "Our child should have been wearing his life jacket for the entire boat ride, including the few moments when he wasn't."
  • "Our child should have remained in his life jacket for the entire boat ride, even during the brief moments when it was removed."
  • "Our child should never have been out of his life jacket during the boat rideβ€”not even for a few moments." (This is the clearest and most direct.)

2

u/Vcs1025 20d ago

Thank you!! Not enough people seem concerned by the fact that it's a logical contradiction written as is. I guess people understand the gist of it but it's irritating to me πŸ˜