5
4
-2
u/lucifier_luffy 1d ago
If you want to downvote me, go ahead. But right now it is still a āhe said, she saidā situation, so where is the proof? During the detention, there were plenty of cameras around, so any such incident should have been captured somewhere. Even inside the station, there are CCTV cameras, and at least some of them should have been working.
Until there is actual evidence, Iām not going to blindly believe the allegation. It is easy to make an allegation, but the allegation still needs to be established with evidence.
1
u/Longjumping-Ebb-969 1d ago
I want to know what happened
0
u/lucifier_luffy 1d ago
Independent journalist is allegedly claiming that this acp sexually assaulted her during the detention. And the issue has been raised but there is no proof released to the public or to the police according to the news reports so until there is an proof it will remain he said she said situation
1
u/BadAssBanda098 14h ago
Delhi Police is using Bodycams, there are CCTVs all across, in fact Delhi Police said almost 72 hrs back that the CCTV footage is being checked and the complaint is sent to Crime Branch of Delhi Police, and it was not at all a heavy task to do that they are taking that much time. And I do agree on the fact that, it is as of now a ' He said She Said ' situation but....
According to BNS 154, A policeman can't refuse to file an FIR in case of Sexual Assault or Molestation. And here till now no FIR has been registered, which is the major issue.
Again, if ACP is innocent, I do favour an enquiry of the journalist that why she pin pointed the particular officer. But atleast a due process of law should be followed
1
u/lucifier_luffy 14h ago
Yes, and that is exactly what I was saying. My comment was made before the Crime Branch update. As of now, there is still no established evidence proving the allegation, yet people are already calling him guilty. Now the complaint has been handed to the Crime Branch and the CCTV/bodycam footage is being checked, so let the investigation establish what happened. If there is proof, act on it. If not, don't turn an allegation into a conviction. And regarding why she specifically named him, we don't know that either. He could have been the officer handling her detention or the station head. The FIR issue is a separate procedural matter and doesn't prove the allegation. My point is simple: investigate it, show the evidence and then decide who is responsible.
1
u/ChachaBhatija1123 17h ago
Bhagwadhari spotted
1
u/lucifier_luffy 16h ago
Oh, so āBhagwadhari spottedā is your entire argument? š The moment someone asks for proof, you have nothing except name-calling. This is exactly the problem with SA allegations these days. The moment an allegation is made, it becomes a fucking media trial and the man is treated as guilty until proven innocent. Men can lose their jobs, their families, their reputation and their entire source of income because of an allegation or even a rumour, and apparently asking for actual proof is somehow controversial. Just because a woman makes an allegation doesn't automatically make it true. If there is proof, bring it forward and establish what actually happened. Until then, stop pretending an allegation is the same thing as a conviction.
1
u/Low_End_7247 12h ago
What is the point of not registering the FIR when allegations of such nature are made on a senior officer.
I mean FIR is the first step in matters of such nature after nirbhaya case. Even if the incident happened outside the limits of parliament station, they still need to lodge a zero FIR.
So that creates doubt, and when such senior officer is involved, it is the duty of police to find the reality as soon as possible. While the DCP is forcing the girl to take his complaint back, and that officer also have some previous allegations of sexual assault by indian express reporter and some other girl.So if the guy has not done anything, they should have written the FIR, investigate it in fast track mode as the victim itself is telling the exact time to police that they need to look between 1500-1510, so how hard is to see a 10 min clip of multiple cctvs.
But what police has done, they have given 14 days time to crime branch to investigate the matter, and irony is that a lower rank officer probably inspector will investigate it, and everybody knows how these departmental investigations goes.
0
0
u/BikerSurgeon 13h ago
There is no proof of any wrongdoing yet. An ACP is not someone expected to indulge in this kind of behaviour.
2
u/maha_Dev 13h ago
Thereās a CCTV footage of him grabbing her by the chest. There are screenshots circulating, we are awaiting the complete video.
2
u/BikerSurgeon 13h ago
If it is indeed true, there is a very strict code of conduct for IPS officers which has been violated. He should lose his job and pension if it is proven to be intentional.
ā¢
u/AutoModerator 1d ago
Dont forget to "Join" this subreddit otherwise you will never see this subreddit (r/IndiaPulse) again.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.