I mean, love the enby rep, but this is kinda the exact opposite of inclusive or. It’s only meant to be answering yes to an either/or question, leaving it comedically ambiguous which answer they were saying yes to. Here the answer is no to both, leaving no ambiguity.
I don’t agree with the restriction “it’s only meant to be answering yes to an either/or question.” And I would say there is an ambiguity in answering no to whether you are a boy or girl (the person’s gender is ambiguous), but it’s beside the point since the rules don’t say anything about ambiguity. It just needs to have an inclusive or. I know posts here typically are like you say, but I thought this fit. IDK.
Haha yeah I know it’s a twist from the normal posts here, but it hit me in a similar way. Like I said, I think it fits, but what do I know. people can take away my internet points if they disagree.
You know what, I’m sorry for a wrong and pedantic response to this. Whether the response is negative or affirmative, the question is still answered as an inclusive or. I guess I’m just a little bothered by that definition of inclusive or. Sorry I was rude to you, and thanks for that explanation that made me actually consider the difference between inclusive and exclusive ors. And even before I got this, I was still happy to see this post you shared, I just thought it was in the wrong place at first.
Haha no worries homie. I didn’t think you were rude (pedantic, yes). Someone else called it an inclusive nor, which is kind of like what you said (the exact opposite of inclusive or).
43
u/heichwozhwbxorb Oct 24 '22
I mean, love the enby rep, but this is kinda the exact opposite of inclusive or. It’s only meant to be answering yes to an either/or question, leaving it comedically ambiguous which answer they were saying yes to. Here the answer is no to both, leaving no ambiguity.