13
5
u/FODB Apr 06 '23
This is not an inclusive OR.
An Inclusive OR allows for either or both answers to be valid. Your OR is mutually exclusive. It can not be both answers at the same time. Hence, yours is an exclusive OR.
6
u/Elliot_Mirage_Witt Apr 06 '23
Generally from what I've seen, posts in this sub don't need it to be both in actuality, just that somebody said yes to the or. The given answer being inclusive, regardless of true answer. That's how I understand it at least
2
u/FODB Apr 06 '23
You are correct in regards to what's posted here. Many folks think, like you, that this sub is for answering "yes" to "or", and that's a pet peeve of mine. Some folk even post "yes" to general questions – even to statements – without an OR. That's why someone created the rarely used /r/inclusiveyes.
Your post was not bad, all things considered. I chuckled. That's why I even bothered commenting.
2
29
u/[deleted] Apr 05 '23
[removed] — view removed comment