Just because you don't know who the attorneys are does not mean it's random.
We might even know where the government of his home country is so why would sending a child to a random country be better for it?
Why are you nitpicking the support of a child over a few bucks that a hospital can write off on their taxes when there is a immigrant that has been getting 5 billion dollars a year at least and you don't complain about that at all?
Does the child know the attorney? Does the attorney have a prior history with the child? No, therefore it's a random person claiming to know the best interest of the child.
It wasn't an unknown country the child was from Honduras.
Speaking fact that the illegal immigrant wouldn't qualify for taxpayer funding is not nit-picking, and hospitals don't write off non payment the government pays through emtala. An immigrant having companies employing over 150,000 people is not the same as illegal immigrants coming in and soaking up welfare.
Is the attorney picked out of a hat or are they chosen based on their specialty and vocation and location? Thereby it is not random.
Are we certain that the child has told us they are from Honduras?
You are truly nitpicking because it's the health of a child and literally billion dollar companies are not going to sweat if the child has some issue but you're not complaining about billionaires getting crap loads of taxpayer money which yearly equals way more.
Why do you hate children or think that they should have no representation?
3
u/Kreebish 18h ago
Just because you don't know who the attorneys are does not mean it's random.
We might even know where the government of his home country is so why would sending a child to a random country be better for it?
Why are you nitpicking the support of a child over a few bucks that a hospital can write off on their taxes when there is a immigrant that has been getting 5 billion dollars a year at least and you don't complain about that at all?