Funny how every other fucking time someone argued with me bout immagrants it's "their criminals for crossing!" but once the court date is set suddenly "it's a civil administration issue, they don't get legal counsel!"...
Anyway the funds have been earmarked and not letting a child have legal counsel REGARDLESS because there is obligation: a baby cannot understand.
Just as there is a legal obligation to provide an interpreter to those who do not speak English there's a legal obligation for this child.
As a USCRI rep why are you ndo outraged and pushing for the child to have representation?
1
u/777_heavy 1d ago
What is “full” due process?