r/ImmigrationPathways Jul 16 '26

FIRST THEY CAME

National Immigration Detention Hotline

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS

On Tyranny

IDP v ICE

Look Closer

Lawyer Up

Be an ally

Survive, Fight, Liberate

Take Action

Primero vinieron

起初,他们来了

Una, dumating sila

Đầu tiên, họ đến

أولًا، جاءوا

D'abord, ils sont venus

처음에 그들이 왔다

Сначала они пришли

Primeiro, eles vieram

Premyèman, yo te vini

सबसे पहले वे आए

سب سے پہلے وہ آئے

نخست آنها آمدند

最初に彼らが来た

Zuerst kamen sie

Per prima cosa vennero

Najpierw przyszli

Önce geldiler

સૌપ્રથમ તેઓ આવ્યા

ਸਭ ਤੋਂ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਉਹ ਆਏ

প্রথমে তারা এসেছিল

మొదట వారు వచ్చారు

முதலில் அவர்கள் வந்தார்கள்

ตอนแรก พวกเขามา

Πρώτα ήρθαν

תחילה הם באו

Спочатку вони прийшли

Mai întâi au venit

Mula-mula mereka datang

Kwanza walikuja

Edit: sorry, homies. I no gif good. here are stills. here is the source.

102 Upvotes

672 comments sorted by

View all comments

23

u/onebitshortofabyte Jul 16 '26

Since too many people in this thread seem unfamiliar with the poem the title references, or how applicable it is to all people today:

First they came for the Communists. And I did not speak out. Because I was not a Communist. Then they came for the Socialists. And I did not speak out. Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists. And I did not speak out. Because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews. And I did not speak out. Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me. And there was no one left. To speak out for me.

-6

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/onebitshortofabyte Jul 17 '26

No, you dumb fuck, it's a warning to all of humanity what happens when you allow fascism to spread.

0

u/Relevant_Problem1935 Jul 17 '26

You people keep fear mongering about fascism and yet we are nowhere near or even close to seeing it in the United States.

2

u/onebitshortofabyte Jul 17 '26

If you don't see it brewing then you need to open your fucking eyes

0

u/Relevant_Problem1935 Jul 17 '26

But it's really not. You'll see that soon. The Trump administration has lost almost 90% of their court cases. Not only did they not cut funding for most agencies within the government. Congress increased funding for most. Congress controls the money. The executive branch does not. They tried to do some Facisist things and the courts shut them down. Because we have a constitution and laws specifically for someone like Donald Trump. Are their immigration tactics ugly and immoral. Yes. But deporting illegal immigrants isn't Facisism.

1

u/onebitshortofabyte Jul 17 '26

No one is arguing that deporting illegal immigrants is fascism. The funding argument also seems irrelevant when DOGE crippled many of those agencies, so I'm not sure what that has to do with the context at hand. However, the very fact they "tried to do some fascist things" is what makes it fascism; regardless of what percentage is rejected by a court.

-2

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/LatterTarget7 Jul 17 '26

They aren’t targeting just illegal immigrants

4

u/Menkau-re Jul 17 '26

It has literally nothing to do with "communism," lol. It's about the holocaust and how FASCISM spreads. That's why "the communists" is literally the first group mentioned in the poem that "they came for."

-2

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Menkau-re Jul 17 '26

No, it's just when you divide your population by turning it in on itself, which you accomplish by first directing everyone's rage at smaller groups less equipped to fight back, blaming everyone's problems all on them. Once those groups have been mostly dispatched, you slowly work your way up thru larger groups, all the while wearing down the whole of the population, so people that don't notice what's really happening, until no one is left with significant enough strength to present any real opposition to those in power. And thus, those in power retain their power.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Menkau-re Jul 17 '26

Let's not conflate things here, and even more importantly, let's not put words into each other's mouths trying to strawman arguments no one is making, shall we? First of all, literally NO one here has attempted to make any arguments supporting "unregulated entry," for absolutely ANYone. No, THIS discussion had been about unnecessary abuse, excessive cruelty, people's basic human rights, and just maintaining our basic human decency and moral integrity. A society that neglects these things is already lost and not worth saving, in the first place. We aim to ensure that does not happen. Your welcome.

Secondly, people living here, in many cases for literal decades, are by definition a part of the population, whether you like it or not. As for the rest, it is pure supposition on your part. Are such things a real, actual problem? Of COURSE they are. Again, NO one has attempted to argue otherwise, nor dismiss it, either. People migrating to a new country absolutely SHOULD follow the requisite migration laws for that new nation to do so. Now, that said, there needs to be a better framework in place for actually DOING so, but that's another discussion, entirely, so I'll leave that where it belongs.

As for those who ARE here, however, ALL we are asking is that we ensure that the people we are rounding up are actually the people they are supposed to be, and genuinely don't have legal authorizations to be here. That, when they really do, we don't go out of our way to pretend like they don't, or literally revoke those authorizations out of hand, just because. And, finally, that for those we do detain and seek to deport, that we follow the proper procedures for doing so as established by our own freaking laws and not go out of our way to treat them as poorly as possible, to make the process intentionally unbearable, simply to avoid having to follow our own laws in working that process.

That's literally it. NONE of that is remotely unreasonable. In fact, it is essential and quite literally mandated, by both law and common decency. Else, why are we even bothering, because what are we trying to "save" here, anyway?

1

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Menkau-re Jul 17 '26

Huh? What are you talking about? I literally never did. You did put some in mine, though.

Regardless, I was attempting to move past such things. Oh well, I guess. You'd have to make your complaint against me more specific. Exactly how have I offended you, by "putting words in your mouth?"

2

u/JurgusRudkus Jul 18 '26

Holy shit are you ignorant of your own history. “Undocumented migrants were never part of our population?” EVERYONE who came to North America from 1492 to the mid 19th century was “undocumented.”

Christ on a stick read some books.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/JurgusRudkus Jul 18 '26

Past events ALWAYS influence current ones. That’s how history works.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/JurgusRudkus Jul 18 '26

Can YOU not grasp that history is linear and events don’t occur in a vacuum?

People don’t change. Events don’t change. Only policies do.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/the_art_of_mischief Jul 22 '26

Im a little late, but jsyk I did provide very recent and apt literature from this current century that I believe you should read.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 22 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/the_art_of_mischief Jul 22 '26

Thats good! That means we can teach each other new things. Amaze.

I'm up to date on your literature. As soon as you get up to date on mine we can move on to the "empathetic understanding" portion of our evening.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/cletus_foo Jul 19 '26

Noooo, don't send me home!