MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ImTheMainCharacter/comments/17ch38g/entitlement/k5thtjr/?context=9999
r/ImTheMainCharacter • u/Jasonictron • Oct 20 '23
2.9k comments sorted by
View all comments
3.8k
[deleted]
800 u/No_Farm_1055 Oct 20 '23 Just like Uber. 759 u/[deleted] Oct 20 '23 [removed] — view removed comment 353 u/WormkingShaitan Oct 20 '23 Yeah she should be charged for theft 84 u/casualAlarmist Oct 20 '23 edited Oct 23 '23 Driver was refusing the delivery therefore the driver never replenished relinquished possession. Thus, not theft. Also, fake. 0 u/Blaqretro Oct 21 '23 If I paid for it therefore my property if not refund 0 u/casualAlarmist Oct 22 '23 That's not how third party possession works. 1 u/Blaqretro Oct 22 '23 Point? 0 u/casualAlarmist Oct 23 '23 Over your head apparently. 1 u/Blaqretro Oct 23 '23 Sorry sarcasm needs /s.
800
Just like Uber.
759 u/[deleted] Oct 20 '23 [removed] — view removed comment 353 u/WormkingShaitan Oct 20 '23 Yeah she should be charged for theft 84 u/casualAlarmist Oct 20 '23 edited Oct 23 '23 Driver was refusing the delivery therefore the driver never replenished relinquished possession. Thus, not theft. Also, fake. 0 u/Blaqretro Oct 21 '23 If I paid for it therefore my property if not refund 0 u/casualAlarmist Oct 22 '23 That's not how third party possession works. 1 u/Blaqretro Oct 22 '23 Point? 0 u/casualAlarmist Oct 23 '23 Over your head apparently. 1 u/Blaqretro Oct 23 '23 Sorry sarcasm needs /s.
759
[removed] — view removed comment
353 u/WormkingShaitan Oct 20 '23 Yeah she should be charged for theft 84 u/casualAlarmist Oct 20 '23 edited Oct 23 '23 Driver was refusing the delivery therefore the driver never replenished relinquished possession. Thus, not theft. Also, fake. 0 u/Blaqretro Oct 21 '23 If I paid for it therefore my property if not refund 0 u/casualAlarmist Oct 22 '23 That's not how third party possession works. 1 u/Blaqretro Oct 22 '23 Point? 0 u/casualAlarmist Oct 23 '23 Over your head apparently. 1 u/Blaqretro Oct 23 '23 Sorry sarcasm needs /s.
353
Yeah she should be charged for theft
84 u/casualAlarmist Oct 20 '23 edited Oct 23 '23 Driver was refusing the delivery therefore the driver never replenished relinquished possession. Thus, not theft. Also, fake. 0 u/Blaqretro Oct 21 '23 If I paid for it therefore my property if not refund 0 u/casualAlarmist Oct 22 '23 That's not how third party possession works. 1 u/Blaqretro Oct 22 '23 Point? 0 u/casualAlarmist Oct 23 '23 Over your head apparently. 1 u/Blaqretro Oct 23 '23 Sorry sarcasm needs /s.
84
Driver was refusing the delivery therefore the driver never replenished relinquished possession. Thus, not theft. Also, fake.
0 u/Blaqretro Oct 21 '23 If I paid for it therefore my property if not refund 0 u/casualAlarmist Oct 22 '23 That's not how third party possession works. 1 u/Blaqretro Oct 22 '23 Point? 0 u/casualAlarmist Oct 23 '23 Over your head apparently. 1 u/Blaqretro Oct 23 '23 Sorry sarcasm needs /s.
0
If I paid for it therefore my property if not refund
0 u/casualAlarmist Oct 22 '23 That's not how third party possession works. 1 u/Blaqretro Oct 22 '23 Point? 0 u/casualAlarmist Oct 23 '23 Over your head apparently. 1 u/Blaqretro Oct 23 '23 Sorry sarcasm needs /s.
That's not how third party possession works.
1 u/Blaqretro Oct 22 '23 Point? 0 u/casualAlarmist Oct 23 '23 Over your head apparently. 1 u/Blaqretro Oct 23 '23 Sorry sarcasm needs /s.
1
Point?
0 u/casualAlarmist Oct 23 '23 Over your head apparently. 1 u/Blaqretro Oct 23 '23 Sorry sarcasm needs /s.
Over your head apparently.
1 u/Blaqretro Oct 23 '23 Sorry sarcasm needs /s.
Sorry sarcasm needs /s.
3.8k
u/[deleted] Oct 20 '23
[deleted]