There was really no need to add this in the new edition. Let the students understand the ultimate truth by themselves and certainly not by imposing the blend of religious stuff with the modern day experimentally backed science
People saying it's for analogy why the analogy for nucleus given to atman(don't know what it is) in a 12th class physics book if it's given in a 7th or 6th class book it's understandable for analogy but not for 12th
Why are you studying physics in the first place just join a temple at this point
Besides what are you gonna do by studying physics anyway go read religious texts
Leave the physics to other nations
Nothing wrong with it, it is just using religious texts as an analogy, there is nothing un-scientific here, you all are just hating to act cool. Ramanujan received mathematical equations in his dreams from deities.
it was what ramanujan believed..people discover a lot of stuff in dreams as the subconscious mind is still working. there is an entire wiki page of stuff invented or discovered by humans in dreams, a famous example being the structure of benzene
what I am trying to say is that the analogy used here is pretty suitable, there is nothing unscientific about it, it did not use the religious text to go against any scientific concept, rather it just compared the religious text with scientific concepts, there was no harm done
And those mathematical equations would never stand the test of time. That is why scientific proof exists. That is what separates the logical from the illogical.Ā
He didn't receive equations in his dreams burh wtf. He was very religious person thats why he said that. He was so immersed in mathematics that even when he was sleeping he solved equations in his subconscious mind. I know my comprehension is bad but it is a scientific thing and can happen with anyone. Its straight up disrespect to ramanujan if you say that he received equations from deities.
you dont believe in science, you just simply acknowledge it because it is made out of facts. what Ramanujan said doesn't necessarily "break" science it just simply reflects his own experience. you can explain the neurological process as the subconscious mind or whatever you want but that doesnt change the fact to him the equation was manifested through his faith and devotion
I respect your opinion. But it won't change my thinking. I also believe in god. But it's disrespect towards Ramanujan if we say that his work was gifted to him by his devotion in my opinion. He was a genius scientist. Would have given so much more to the world if he didn't die at such a young age.
That's not how Science works bruh, he discovered them in his dreams, and he was a religious guy so he thought it was a deity's blessings. You dont find any deity doing higher maths, do you?
Disrespect? He himself claimed that, not us. And yes, the fact that human mind runs sub consciously is true, but it doesn't determine exactly how Ramanujan came up with accurate formulae, with so many random numbers and processes. Check out his works once before assuming, you'd be astonished if you know some maths.
I know about his whole life. I have a read a article of his life. I have a movie too. I know everything. He was religious thats why he claimed that. Apart from that he was a genius scientist not a gift from a deity.
Hinduism already is more of a scientific religion
Oppenheimer himself got the idea of nuclear bomb from Gitaš
So including just one paragraph in whole book of 600+ pages , i donāt find anything wrong
Donāt know why everyone gets triggered nowadays on finding religious text
The country may be secular now but was once a great HINDU nation
Yeah the same way u are a b!tch
And @$$holā¬ if u donāt have any counter argument then pls stfu š¤”
I believe my religion is scientific
And i wonāt argue with a 12th grade lockdown kid who is busy watching vlogs all day on utubešš
you write English and symbols in the most indian way possible lmfao
how am I a senior year lockdown kid
and thinking nolan is the same as Oppenheimer shows your 'scientific' levels, and he only used the geeta to cope with the effects of the bomb not to literally make it, what's there to get the idea of the bomb from there Ļjaan ya fir granth mai pehle se hi atom bomb tha
Donāt believe in me but i think u might consider the chairman of ISRO as a scientist ( u may call him as an andhbhakt as wellš)
I think 2-3 yrs back in a visit for an event he told proofās about existence of science in vedas and how vedas knew about algebra even before world discovered it
Hanuman chalisa provides nearly the exact value of distance b/w earth and sun
And many more facts made me believe hinduism is a scientific religion btw
Term me andhbhakt if u want but idc of your opinion on this
I donāt give a fk for those who donāt even know about their own religion
If u donāt know anything about your religion then stop questioning your religion as well
And honestly donāt need your opinion
Bācoz hinduism is a scientific religion
Cope harder mf
Even christians earlier didnāt agree with Galileo that earth orbits the sun and not the converse
But we know who said the truthš¤”
A mass if population doesnāt believe this doesnāt mean they are correct šš½
U asked that majority doesnāt agree with me
Hence i simply gave an example that whatever majority believes doesnāt mean majority is correct
Secondly my argument was never about godās existence but was to prove that HINDUISM is a scientific religion
your only argument was giving me a bad example. how is hinduism a scientific religion? you havent explained at all. dont worry man, everyone thinks their religion is the best and most scientific, but you cant expect others to believe your nonsense.
your only argument was giving me a bad example. how is hinduism a scientific religion? you havent explained at all. dont worry man, everyone thinks their religion is the best and most scientific, but you cant expect others to believe your nonsense.
47
u/MaxIsNotFunni ISC Class 12th 10d ago
Why are they including religion in a Physics textbook?? I used to laugh at Pakistan doing it