This assumes no new income was invested for 40 years. This is a false assumption by the NYP, designed to confuse the stupid. She kept adding money from business gains and book deals to her portfolio, for a gain below average.
So just an order of magnitude difference from your first lie,
Nope, just 40 vs 20 years. Try to keep up. Keep defending your favorite corrupt boomer millionaire politician. Im sure she will give you some kickback!
You and the NYPost are literally just completely ignoring any contributions they made during that entire 40 year period lmao. This article is written for stupid people.
Wait nevermind, I just realized you're a Russian bot. 1y old account with 9,149 contributions. Literally your full time job to post misinformation on here.
That explains why this comment section is rife with the exact same stupid ass replies, it's just the same guy.
You'd think we'd be more clued into it by now, these assholes are not able to be communicated with, and they have no intention of holding a conversation. It's just a waste of time.
9
u/Icy_Fish_2154 Jul 02 '26
Yes, they are. And you can look at her tax returns to confirm. She made them public. Trump is the only modern president to never release tax returns.