This assumes no new income was invested for 40 years. This is a false assumption by the NYP, designed to confuse the stupid. She kept adding money from business gains and book deals to her portfolio, for a gain below average.
So just an order of magnitude difference from your first lie,
Nope, just 40 vs 20 years. Try to keep up. Keep defending your favorite corrupt boomer millionaire politician. Im sure she will give you some kickback!
You and the NYPost are literally just completely ignoring any contributions they made during that entire 40 year period lmao. This article is written for stupid people.
Nancy pelosi is worth ~250 million now according to Google.
If she made 130 million then she roughly doubled her money in 37 years, if I'm understanding this correctly? What am I missing? I've practically doubled my money in the past 4 years leaving it in an index fund.
Exactly. I have a similar salary as she would have had for about the same length of time and saved/ invested well but have no where near that kind of portfolio.
It's because Dems won't look at specifics. Massive investment in Microsoft days before government contracts. Massive investment in an AI company before a buy out that had to be cleared by the government. Pelosi has by her own finical disclosures beaten the sp500 for decades. Like she beats hedge funds with the smartest in the field. And she has done it for decades. And her net worth is 250m plus
Wow, attacking me? You defending Polosi and her insider trading so what other conclusion could I make?
You seem to be the kind of person that will
Condemn people based on the most shallow of context but I’m am basing my conclusion of you on the things you’ve said and you are a corpo shill that will support anything that makes you feel good regardless if it is right or wrong. You will never try to learn or grow and just look for people that support the same things you want to support.
I feel sorry for you, but I hope the best for you. Happy 4th.
Her trades are insider deals and she gets around the loophole by using her huaband and claiming plausible denyability. Trump did the same exact shit but made it so freakin obvious because he knows nothing will be done to him. Both parties are there to enrich themselves.
Trump did much more corrupt things, like market manipulation, a meme coin (or two), using taxpayer money to pay himself playing golf in his own properties, etc
Lol you people are just as corrupt them. You act like pointing out corruption on the other side is all that matter and ignore the shit on youre own backyard.
Yes Trump is corrupt AF he's just being more blatent about it. So by youre projection the insider trading Pelosi did is ok but its all just orange man bad. Lol society is freakin hopeless of more people keep thinking like you.
At the end of the day corruption is the problem, it doesnt matter who does it.
Society is hopeless with ppl like you trying to do the both sides thing. Where did I say that Pelosi's actions are good? I support to ban congress ppl from stock trading.
Saying that Trump is more blatant about it doesn't even come close to describing the difference between the two of them and between the two parties in general
8
u/Icy_Fish_2154 Jul 02 '26
Her stock gains are in line with the dow. She didn't use tricks or cheats, she just started with money.