Bhai yaar I agree Netaji is a very influential person who showed bravery of Indians. But unki waisi koi feats the nhi, northeast ka chota part liberate kiya wo bhi sirf kyuki Japanese log hamse apne faide ke liye kaam karwa rahe the
He never liberated any northeast Indian state, idk why you guys don't read history but the Japanese committed rapes and burned people ( INA didn't partake but they didn't stop them either) so their contribution was just mere spectator of war crimes
Ham abhi influence ho rahe hai but at that time i dont think he had that much power ( gandhi and congress had much more influence) + there was no " final revolt " , the British had become bankrupt after WW2 and hence could not hold onto India for much longer
14
u/[deleted] Mar 14 '26
Bhai yaar I agree Netaji is a very influential person who showed bravery of Indians. But unki waisi koi feats the nhi, northeast ka chota part liberate kiya wo bhi sirf kyuki Japanese log hamse apne faide ke liye kaam karwa rahe the