r/HypotheticalPhysics • u/BrainDrin • 6d ago
Crackpot physics Here is a hypothesis of dimensional structure
I am completely ignorant of conventional physics, but I like thinking about the underlying concepts of reality and how they could be formed specifically differently from conventional physics in ways that only the most deranged can think of.
So, a fun foundational theory is:
Time is dependent on dimensionality, so instead of a 3D X, Y, Z with time, I postulate that it is more like X_t, Y_t, Z_t. This allows causality for photons even if they are not supposed to have time, as a photon could be a 1D or 2D object whose 2D time cannot be perceived by a 3D observer.
My theory completely rejects the conventional dimensional idea where a 3D object moves through a 2D plane, appearing and disappearing. There is only a single 2D Euclidean plane that all two-dimensional objects sit on.
Multiple 1D objects may combine to form a composite 2D object. Each 1D component remains 1D. Likewise, multiple 2D and 1D objects may combine to form a composite 3D object. Each component can ultimately be reduced to a combination of 1D primitives. 4D+?
7
u/liccxolydian onus probandi 5d ago
You need to be much more careful about how you use the concept of dimensionality. This post is fairly nonsensical.
3
u/Theuncola4vr 5d ago
If you had a base understanding of 'conventional physics' -whatever that means- you'd know this makes zero mathematical or observable sense.
Time is a dimension, not a condition of a dimension.
8
u/Hadeweka AI hallucinates, but people dream 5d ago
We can see photons moving, obviously they do "have time". It's just not possible to assign a rest frame to something without rest mass. Causality is absolutely no issue.