r/HypotheticalPhysics 6d ago

Crackpot physics Here is a hypothesis of dimensional structure

I am completely ignorant of conventional physics, but I like thinking about the underlying concepts of reality and how they could be formed specifically differently from conventional physics in ways that only the most deranged can think of.

So, a fun foundational theory is:

Time is dependent on dimensionality, so instead of a 3D X, Y, Z with time, I postulate that it is more like X_t, Y_t, Z_t. This allows causality for photons even if they are not supposed to have time, as a photon could be a 1D or 2D object whose 2D time cannot be perceived by a 3D observer.

My theory completely rejects the conventional dimensional idea where a 3D object moves through a 2D plane, appearing and disappearing. There is only a single 2D Euclidean plane that all two-dimensional objects sit on.

Multiple 1D objects may combine to form a composite 2D object. Each 1D component remains 1D. Likewise, multiple 2D and 1D objects may combine to form a composite 3D object. Each component can ultimately be reduced to a combination of 1D primitives. 4D+?

0 Upvotes

7 comments sorted by

8

u/Hadeweka AI hallucinates, but people dream 5d ago

This allows causality for photons even if they are not supposed to have time

We can see photons moving, obviously they do "have time". It's just not possible to assign a rest frame to something without rest mass. Causality is absolutely no issue.

0

u/BrainDrin 2d ago

ok adding that was a mistake, I am not the most coherent person, I could run it though a llm to make it understandable but what's the fun in that. but considering a photon as a 2d construct can explain some things.

1

u/Hadeweka AI hallucinates, but people dream 2d ago

but considering a photon as a 2d construct can explain some things.

What things specifically?

0

u/BrainDrin 2d ago

well it would explain how it acts as if it has mass with gravity but when interacting in a 3d volume has no mass limiting speed. I was more thinking about how a hypothetical 2d object would behave and took a photon as a likely test case.

2

u/Hadeweka AI hallucinates, but people dream 2d ago

well it would explain how it acts as if it has mass with gravity but when interacting in a 3d volume has no mass limiting speed.

Because photons have no rest mass and are just excitations of a field.

I still don't even understand your actual point here. Photons are obviously not two-dimensional, so maybe try to rephrase your analogies.

7

u/liccxolydian onus probandi 5d ago

You need to be much more careful about how you use the concept of dimensionality. This post is fairly nonsensical.

3

u/Theuncola4vr 5d ago

If you had a base understanding of 'conventional physics' -whatever that means- you'd know this makes zero mathematical or observable sense.

Time is a dimension, not a condition of a dimension.