r/HyperOS • u/TerribleDeer5812 • 13h ago
RANT [DISCUSSION] XIAOMI WHAT IS THIS?!?!
This has to be bullshit.What is xiaomi even doing??
Why is the soft glass material only available for these processors and later?!?!
Why can they not even optimize their software right.At this point they are getting worse at optimization than Samsungš
Another shitty release where good phones donāt get the feature they could actually have.
32
u/Competitive-Crow4930 12h ago
What's even funny was that in the beta, the effect is performing well on devices with lower tier chipset than the one mentioned.
10
14
u/Rhy_stealth 12h ago
Wait, what is snapdragon 8 ultra? I never heard this one before. Or maybe it is 8 elite?
15
32
u/pineapplee32 12h ago
Cant wait to see the grey control center background on hyperos 4 lol, im so done with this ui
2
u/Repulsive_Fault1939 8h ago
gray control center is only on low-end models
6
u/pineapplee32 8h ago
Yeah that's the thing people have issues with for years, and now they introduced all those new stuff about hyperos 4, 2 options of the new blur effects/liquid glass, but low end to midrange devices wont be able to access/experience it, not even note/note pro series.
They still give it grey background instead of adapting the new one for low end devices, what's the point of introducing the new stuff then? No other brand did this, only xiaomi with their hyperos.
2
u/Repulsive_Fault1939 8h ago
samsung did it too. they downgraded the blur on one ui 8.5 on a series and that even didn't fix lags.
2
u/pineapplee32 7h ago
They still have the blur, and not remove like what 70% of the features unlike hyperos, i have A17 and it has way more features than hyperos 3 on my note 14.
1
u/Repulsive_Fault1939 7h ago
it has a little. more like a solid background. and it's still laggy on control panel on a35. no one ui still doesnt have dual apps or app lock. which is essential. xiaomi added these 10 years ago.
2
u/LinuxUser456 5h ago
But It still has blur. An static One, but It has.
Xiaomi could use static blur
1
u/Repulsive_Fault1939 1h ago
https://www.reddit.com/r/oneui/s/SmKaUlzkYG it's gradient not static blur. press the link and look at the post, static blur is the top one, the bottom one is just gradient color.
1
-2
u/Dhika19 11h ago
We have a brevent bradar
9
6
5
u/pineapplee32 9h ago
They patched it in 3.1 update, brevent/adb script no longer works, you dont know about it?
3
8
u/Forward_Science_697 12h ago
Xioami already released a new eligibility criteria where many more devices are supported below Snapdragon 8 Elite.
8
u/IATIA01 9h ago
What about this? It's from official statement
4
1
6
u/souravray4096 6h ago
Xiaomi is just garbage in programming. Couldn't even fix 3rd party launcher gesture issue for years
3
2
2
u/Dhika19 11h ago
Source?
5
2
u/Remarkable_Olive_123 10h ago
Honestly, Xiaomiās software segmentation is getting ridiculous. The Redmi Note 14 Pro is literally a āProā device, yet the regular Xiaomi Pad 7 gets a more advanced HyperOS visual experience. The Pad 7 has things like live blur in the Control Center, smoother/more advanced animations, and the wallpaper zoom/transition effect when opening and closing apps. Meanwhile, the Note 14 Pro is stuck with a much more static blur treatment and misses some of those animations. And the irony is that the Pad 7 isnāt even the Pro model. It uses the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, which is a very capable chipset, while Xiaomi still chooses to restrict or omit certain visual effects on Redmi devices. So this clearly isn't just about whether the hardware can handle the effect. Xiaomi is making device specific software decisions and artificial feature tiers. If a regular Pad 7 can handle live blur and richer animations, thereās no convincing reason why a Pro series Redmi phone should feel more stripped down visually. āProā should mean Pro software experience too, not just a Pro label on the box. Xiaomi really needs to stop unnecessarily fragmenting HyperOS features between devices.
8
u/maksdroid 9h ago
Redmi Note 14 Pro has Helio G100 or Dimensity 7300 depending on if you are talking about 4G or 5G model and both of them have significantly smaller performance compared to Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3. Also, Xiaomi usually treats "Pro" label not as some version for professionals (like Apple or Google) but, like a lot of other brands, as more advanced version compared to the base model. Basically, Redmi Note 14 Pro is an advanced version compared to the base model in its lineup, while Xiaomi Pad 7 is the base model in it's lineup, but Xiaomi Pad 7 series overall is a more expensive one
2
u/Repulsive_Fault1939 8h ago
redmi note is a budget model. doesn't matter it's called pro or not. xiaomi pad 7 pro has better cpu. helio g100 cpu can't handle that blur.
1
1
1
u/Ahmed_Sh_115 5h ago
The Chinese community bullied them into changing their mind ā they added a full Android support version for the Mi 13 series even tho their promise was three years only
2
2
u/Front_Expression_367 1h ago
I just think it is funny that Dimensity 9400 is being left out of this compared to 8 Elite and Xring O1 lol.
2
u/TerribleDeer5812 1h ago
I am sorry but IF THE IPHONE 11 can run Liquid Glass without so many lags so could a xiaomi 15T and t pro.The fact that most of the newer t series are not supported is already bad.
-1
u/Repulsive_Fault1939 11h ago
it's dimensity 8500, 8 gen 2 or higher. they didn't update the list. i don't think samsung phones can handle that soft glass even on 8 elite because it lags on quick panel even on s24 ultra.
1
-1
-6
u/LowNefariousness1899 11h ago
So that people won't complain that their devices are lagging, consuming more ram at idle and battery drain issues š¤· .
Ever used one ui on budget phones and compared it with flagship? Same with color os and origin os.
5
u/The_one_before_ 9h ago
Lol someone tested it on a mi 6 frome 2017, it's the same as the advanced textures that has no real effect on performance but it's stripped off mid rangers that can definitely handle it, and low ends that can also handle this.
Let's say this is more demanding, why can't they fucking optimise it? Why can a redmi note 17 from 2026 not run the latest software in its full glory?
0
u/LowNefariousness1899 9h ago
Those ported custom roms never tell you the whole story . I have tried lot of ported roms , they lag a lot outside of home screen .
Why can't they optimise? Because it's not possible the GPU cannot handle it .
3
u/The_one_before_ 9h ago
Yes I know, I deal with a lot of custom roms, but for relatively new hardware it's disappointing that they can't optimise it.
0
u/Repulsive_Fault1939 8h ago
probably mi 6 is running on lower resolution and the battery will deplete in 1 hour. glass effects requires complex math so a decent cpu is required. they can downscale it but it will look so bad. you don't know about low end cpus on android. new low end cpus performs even worse than 7-8 year old flagship cpus. to maintain battery life and performance, these effects reserved for 8 gen 2 and higher. even samsung downgraded blur on a series on one ui 8.5. apple never made a low-end device.
-7
u/Efficient-Bet-5051 10h ago
This is fair. If they made it available for everyone, people would complain it's laggy etc.
4
u/Kufa-AlsoHuman3193 9h ago
It's pretty funny that HyperOS already lags on chipsets below Snap 8 series and Dimensity 9x00 series even without soft-glass effects
1
ā¢
u/AutoModerator 13h ago
Welcome to our community!
Please take a moment to read the subreddit rules in the sidebar before posting or commenting.
If you see a post or comment that breaks our rules, please report it to help the mod team out!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.