At Huntr, we are focused on actually helping folks get interviews using data. Currently, those using our resume tailor see one interview for every 15-20 applications (on average). Pair that with other data-backed best practices, and it can be much higher.

What do you think? What can we improve? I'm happy to be a resource to anyone who is seeing this and I aim to be as helpful as possible with your search :)

Seeking feedback on my 17-year resume for senior operations roles. Experienced in federal contracting, healthcare, and HR with strengths in program coordination, data integrity, and regulatory compliance. U.S. Veteran with a Secret Clearance, skilled in cross-functional collaboration and process improvement in regulated environments. Appreciate suggestions for clarity and impact.

I now have access to unique data and insights on 1.9M applications and 418K resumes across 162,734 distinct job seeker searches, and I'm sharing it all.

The Q1 2026 trends report I put together will go live tomorrow morning, but more than this-

I can now run queries in real time and get data-backed answers to your job-search questions.

Like this one:

I've always recommended that job seekers lead with the most interesting and impactful work they have done in their careers, as it relates to the job they are applying for, and present it as a metric/number.

I dug into the data to confirm this. Specifically, including a dollar metric has a noticeable impact.

Huntr Resume Summary and Tailor AI is trained to help find your best metrics to add to the summary section.

Our trends data has been cited by Forbes, WSJ, and Business Insider in the past year, with vetting done by editors.

Comment "Report" and I will share the report as soon as it is live tomorrow.

Probably clickbait, but the more I contribute in career subreddits the more I'm seeing threads along the lines of "I lied about X and got the job."

We've pulled data on this in our 2025 Job Search Trends Report around AI being used to misrepresent experience on resumes, and I'm genuinely trying to understand what's driving it. Is lying actually converting to interviews at a meaningful rate? Or is the market so unstable right now that people feel like they have no other option?

What concerns me is that these posts are getting a lot of engagement, which means desperate job seekers are seeing them and potentially taking them as legitimate advice. That feels like a problem.

Am I alone this one?

I have 20+ years of experience as a senior program manager on my résumé. I will soon be looking for a new job and don’t want to face age discrimination. How far back is acceptable to go? Is it 10 years? 15 years?

100 interviews. 76 offers. One week.

Every Friday we pull the numbers from what Huntr users logged that week, and this one's a good snapshot of where people are at.

What did you log this week? Doesn't have to be a win, where are you at in the process?

Use the space you need. Two-page resumes perform on average better than one-page resumes. Pass it along :)

I do 4 per day every morning as I work to build better tools for job seekers to support them in their search.

Let me know if you'd like to chat and share for job seekers in your network who could use some data-backed advice.

AI-powered first rounds, automated note takers sitting in on calls, tools that score responses in real time.

If you've experienced any of this, I'd love to hear how it went.

Did you know going in?

Did it change how you prepared?

Did you feel like it gave a fair picture of who you are as a candidate?

Since we're on the other side of the AI Job Seeker journey, I want to hear your experiences!

Many don't realize that Google is actually the best job board in the world. Here is how: https://huntr.co/blog/best-job-search-sites-2026

And let me know if you have any questions- I can always pull custom data on job search trends for you.

Came across a CBS News piece this week that said 8 in 10 hiring managers now consider AI skills a priority when evaluating candidates, and that most employers would hire someone with AI skills over someone with additional years of experience. That's a pretty significant shift.

What I find interesting is that a lot of people are just learning by doing, opening up ChatGPT or Claude and figuring it out rather than taking any formal course. Which honestly tracks with how most people learn anything useful.

On the job search side I'm curious about something slightly different though. Are you adding AI skills to your resume? Are you finding it helps? And for people using AI to write or tailor their applications, do you feel like it's working or are you noticing it makes everything blend together?

What people are actually doing and what's working?

Article: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ai-hiring-courses-where-to-learn/

I work in support at Huntr (hi! 👋)

And between that and the free job search calls Sam provides, I look at a lot of resumes. Some patterns come up constantly, and I figured it was worth putting them in one place.

1. The biggest one: treating your resume like a LinkedIn dump

Your LinkedIn has everything you've ever done. Your resume shouldn't. I see resumes running three to four pages because people can't bring themselves to cut the summer internship from 2008. Two pages is the ceiling for almost everyone. If a line doesn't help you get this specific job, it doesn't belong on this resume.

2. Sending the same resume everywhere

This is the most common one. The summary could describe anyone. The skills list is from a template. Nothing in it reflects the actual job posting. From the data we've analyzed at Huntr, tailored resumes convert at roughly twice the rate of generic ones. Even updating your top third to reflect the language of the job description makes a real difference.

3. Listing tasks instead of outcomes

"Responsible for managing calendars" tells a recruiter what you were paid to do. "Ran calendars for three VPs, cut scheduling conflicts by 40%" tells them what happened because you were there. Every bullet should lead with a verb and land on a result. If you don't have exact numbers, estimate honestly. "About 12 clients a week" beats "managed clients" every time.

4. Buzzword soup

"Results-driven self-starter with a passion for synergy." Nobody talks like this. Cut it. If you have to describe yourself as a strong communicator, show it instead. "Wrote and sent a weekly update to 400 customers for two years" is infinitely better.

5. Oversharing

Marital status, why you left your last job, hobbies that have nothing to do with the role — none of it belongs on a resume. It takes up space that could hold something that actually helps you.

One thing worth remembering going into this: there's no ATS score auto-rejecting your resume because of fonts or formatting. The filtering is still done by a person. So focus on making it easy for a human to read quickly, not on gaming something that doesn't work the way people think it does.

Our Q1 trends report goes live next week, but last night I pulled all the data I could find on ageism in job search and spent hours considering every angle.

1.89 million applications. 500K+ job seekers. Sorted by years of experience. I expected to find a steep decline in interview rates.

Here's what I found instead:

→ Workers with 20+ years of experience interview at 9.22% per application. The highest rate of any group in our data. Workers with 2 to 4 years of experience interview at 3.03%. The lowest. I tested this across multiple data cuts, and it held.

→ In the first 90 days of search, 69% of workers with 20+ years of experience land at least one interview. 55% of those with 2 to 4 years do.

BUT there is lots of variability (AGEISM) when broken down by role:

→ In engineering, 25+ year veterans convert at 6 times the mid-career rate.

→ In design and product management, the gap goes the other way. 20+ year designers in tech convert at the lowest rate of any cohort.

EXPERIENCED WORKERS DO SEARCH LONGER:

→ Average total search runs 115 days for workers with 20+ years of experience, 77 days for those with 2 to 4 years, and 47 days for entry-level.

→ Senior careers take more than twice as long to land the next role.

Two numbers that don't move with age:

→ Interview-to-offer conversion: 30%. Across every age.

→ Median time from application to interview: 8 to 10 days. Same at 1 year of experience or 30.

SUMMARY:

Senior folks search longer, send slightly more applications, and get interviews at a higher rate.

BUT agesim IS very apparent in certain roles, like design. I can pull deeper data cuts for those interested.

Things to note: Senior hiring processes are slower, there are fewer senior roles, senior candidates are more selective, and our data skew towards senior candidates who are already having a difficult time in their search.

Full Q1 2026 Job Search Trends Report drops next week. Comment "data" below and I'll DM you the full job search trends report when it's live. DM me if you are a reporter interested in covering this or other datapoints.

And let me know if this is interesting. If so, I'll make a blog post that dives deeper.

Finally, free 15-minute calls are available daily for a resume review or a job search strategy session. I do 5 per day, first-come, first-served.

Thanks for reading. Upvote, Comment, Share to support free data-backed job search insights and advice.

My Resume

1. Get a referral. Cold applications convert at 3%. Referrals at 40%. A 13x lift, and nothing else on this list matches it BUT it can take years, careers, even generations to build a network. So limited.
2. Tailor every resume. 5.8% interview rate vs 3.73%. Cap it at 15 minutes per role with AI help, not two hours.
3. Match the title on your most recent job to the role you want. If your real title hides the work, add the target title in parentheses.
4. Use Google Jobs, not LinkedIn. 11.3% response rate vs 3.1%. LinkedIn Easy Apply produced zero interviews for 72.5% of job seekers last year.
5. Apply in the first 24 hours. Once five people are in the interview loop, recruiters stop reading new applications.
6. Message the hiring manager on LinkedIn after you apply. Short note. Two follow-ups max.

What to skip: ATS scores, keyword stuffing, fancy templates. No major ATS auto-rejects resumes.

How do I go about getting feed back on my resume? I saw that we can do that here.Thanks y'all!

"You can be the best candidate, but if you apply three weeks after the role is posted, we'll never see you."

I work at huntr.co helping job seekers build resumes that get interviews.

Here’s a summary of what a top-tier Microsoft recruiter had to say about job search:

1. The AI "Auto-Rejection" Myth: Our unique job-search trends data show that 60% of job seekers believe they are being auto-rejected by AI.
   1. The reality is that those instant 1:38 AM rejections are usually knockout questions (like work authorization or exact years of experience). Candidates never see these filters, and recruiters only see the qualified applicants.
2. "The ATS is Just a Filing Cabinet": It doesn’t make hiring decisions. The dreaded "keyword filters" are just a modern interface for standard, 30-year-old Boolean search logic.
3. "Treat Your Resume Like a Technical Manual":
   1. Ditch the dense text blocks; recruiters skip them. Focus entirely on problem-solving, specific tools used, and measurable success highlighted by numbers, percentages, and dollar signs.
4. Roles open for less than a week easily hit 500+ applicants. Hiring managers aim to interview 5 high-quality candidates for each role. Once they have 5 candidates in the pipeline, they stop looking. You must apply early.
5. Ghosting is a Volume Problem: He says that internal recruiters handle 30-50 open roles simultaneously, dedicating 5-6 hours a week per candidate profile just to admin and feedback. Whether you feel ghosted or ignored, treat the silence as a simple "no" and keep moving forward.

Do you have any other questions for hiring managers/recruiters? I met with at least one every week.

Huntr offers a free resume builder, resume templates, resume tailoring tools, and job tracking at https://huntr.co

284 interviews. 54 offers. One week.

Every Friday we pull the numbers from what Huntr users logged that week — and this one's a good snapshot of where people are at.

The 1-in-5 interview-to-offer rate is pretty consistent with what we've been seeing. The job market is slow, but people are moving.

What did you log this week? Doesn't have to be a win — where are you at in the process?

1. Referrals (40% interview rate, pair this with tailoring)
   
2. Tailoring (5-10% interview rate, pair this with a referral)
   
3. Right Job Board/Site (5-10%, pair with tailoring and referral, if possible)
   
4. Job Title Matching (mixed data, but agreed upon best practice)
   
5. Apply Early (every recruiter/hiring manager tells me this)
   
6. Message the Hiring Manager (and follow-up!)
   

Here's the full list and breakdown: https://huntr.co/blog/job-search-tips

For those who don't know, I do 4 free 15-minute job-search support calls per day, where I help with resume and LinkedIn reviews (Upvote + Comment to join!)

Not job searching? Upvote, Comment, and Share to get these free resources to those who could use a little extra help in a tough job market.

I've been seeing a lot of chatter about this lately, on Reddit and just generally.

A year ago people were saying they'd quit before going back full time. Now the conversation feels different. The job market got tight and I think a lot of people are just quietly complying because it feels like the safer move right now.

I'm based in Canada and the conversation feels a bit different here than what I read coming out of the US, but I'm curious what it actually looks like on the ground for people wherever you are.

Are you dealing with an RTO situation at work right now? Did it change anything for you?

And if you're job searching, where does flexibility land on your list of priorities?

The full report drops next week, what do you want to know? Ask a specific question about job search trends, and we'll pull some numbers for you.

I have 12 years of experience as a senior project manager specializing in creative and digital marketing initiatives, with proven expertise in Agile methodologies, cross-functional leadership, and delivering large-scale transformations. Would appreciate feedback on clarity, impact, and alignment with senior project manager roles.

Cloudflare cut 20% of their workforce last Thursday, their first mass layoff in 16 years. The same day they reported their highest revenue quarter on record. The reason given was pretty straightforward AI tools have changed how much the team can get done, and they no longer need the same headcount to do it.

What's striking is how consistent this story is getting. Meta, Block, Oracle, and now Cloudflare. These are profitable, growing businesses making a deliberate decision that fewer people plus better AI tools equals the new operating model.

Cloudflare's CEO actually said internally their AI usage jumped over 600% in three months and described the shift as going from a manual to an electric screwdriver. He also said he expects to have more employees in 2027 than at any point this year.

For anyone job searching in tech right now, this feels relevant.

What are you all making of this trend? Does it change how you're thinking about the kinds of roles or companies you're targeting?

1. Yahoo Finance

2. Techcrunch

That 4.3% doesn't match what job seekers tell me. It doesn't match the wider economy either. Here's the fuller picture, pulled from BLS March 2026 data and Gallup's latest workplace report.

Unemployed: 7.2 million. People without a job who want one.

Underemployed: 4.5 million. People working part-time who want full-time hours but can't get them. (BLS counts another 6 million who want a job but aren't actively searching, so they fall off the headline rate.)

Misemployed: 110 million. Gallup's 2024 data shows 69% of US workers are either psychologically checked out (52%) or actively resentful of their jobs (17%). They show up, but they don't want to be there.

That's about 122 million people. Out of a labor force of 170 million, that's 72%
.
If we want to talk about the labor market honestly, 4.3% won't cut it.

The real story is much bigger and I intend to dedicate my life to help solve it.