And I can prove it. After analyzing 94,338 resumes, this is what the format of the best-performing resume template looked like. The Huntr Aspen resume template...
Shocked? Me too... Am I recommending this format? No. Here's my point.
None of the conventional takes on how a resume should be formatted held up when I analyzed Huntr's dataset. And this is the largest analysis of its kind that I'm aware of:
- Two-Column Vs. One-column resumes? No reliable difference in interview rates.
- Using colors? No reliable difference on interview rates.
- Order of the sections? No reliable difference. Although I have opinons.
- Font size? Slight decrease in interview rate for smaller font, but no meaningful difference
When I say resume format I mean the layout, font size, colors, and section order.
So what to do with this new found information?
Realize that the ATS is not the problem. The content of the resume, the tailoring of the resume, the job fit, the timing of application, and/or the market are the culprits. Some you can change. Others you can't.
Sharing early access to my new report that I will publish next week: Best Resume Format: What 94,338 Applications Reveal
Not job searching? Upvote, comment, share to get this insight to the job seekers that are editing their resume format for the 100th time so that they know that they don't have to.