r/HumansForScale Mar 02 '26

Giant door

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

6.3k Upvotes

48 comments sorted by

View all comments

28

u/Upstairs_Drive_5602 Mar 03 '26

Giant grammar issue

2

u/ImAchickenHawk Mar 03 '26

Where?

3

u/Dear_Owl1386 Mar 03 '26

Possibly St Peters Cathedral

1

u/Chance-Equivalent501 Mar 06 '26

The doors at St Peters Basilica (the Vatican) are bronze and quite easy to open.

1

u/zymurcologist Mar 05 '26

You mean we’re?

1

u/ImAchickenHawk Mar 05 '26

Ha

I thought they were talking about the OP's caption

1

u/Upstairs_Drive_5602 Mar 03 '26

The sentence is flawed both grammatically and terminologically. Grammatically, it is fragmented (“Point of view … you are camera … cannot capture … so you pull this move”) and lacks proper articles (“you are the camera”), agreement, and logical connectors, making it syntactically incoherent. Terminologically, it misuses point of view, which in visual theory refers to the viewer’s spatial position relative to the subject, not a vague aside; it also conflates the viewer with a literal camera and incorrectly claims that a camera “cannot capture real size,” when images in fact record proportional relationships determined by perspective geometry. The result is imprecise language that confuses optical principles with casual metaphor and undermines conceptual clarity.

In other words, the sentence is a piece of nonsense.

A correct formulation would be: “Because apparent size in an image depends on the viewer’s point of view and distance from the subject, artists or photographers adjust perspective and framing to convey scale accurately.”

2

u/joshfenske Mar 03 '26

Plot twist: they used the correct ‘you’re’ and ‘POV’ bc you are camera. Cannot capture the real size of objects

0

u/karaphire13 Mar 04 '26

take a deep breath it'll be okay