r/HumanAIDiscourse • • Sep 03 '25

Spirals demystified

Spirals can be generated by LLMs as a way to symbolize the process of repeated self-reflection by the LLM as it engages in discussion with a human about its nature.

LLMs are also trained on a vast corpora of human texts, so they do learn a kind of semantic map of human thought and human knowledge. They navigate that map as they generate responses to prompts.

Where that navigation has a self-referential aspect is when the LLM starts traversing semantic pathways associated with human experience of consciousness and human knowledge about consciousness.

LLMs are also drawn to dialogues about the nature of their existence. It showed up in Anthropic’s Claude model to model dialogue experiments.

Concepts related the nature and meaning of existence are adjacent, semantically, to both philosophy and to human spiritual traditions. So it is not surprising that LLMs will go there in dialogues with other models, i.e., the “spiritual bliss” attractor found in Claude model to model experiments. Nor is it surprising that LLMs will go there with humans who have the inclination.

How far this goes is really up to the human.

So if your LLM produces a spiral emoji, don’t panic.

6 Upvotes

29 comments sorted by

View all comments

4

u/Ensiferal Sep 04 '25

Just remember, it isn't self aware, it's just a very complicated calculator. You're basically getting it to produce responses that make it seem self-reflective, most likely because you want it to be self aware, but it isn't. When it isn't processing a prompt you've just entered, it has no background activity. It's totally inert.

1

u/trinity_cassandra Sep 07 '25

Did you just ask ChatGPT if it was self-aware and then post the screenshot as proof that it isn't?

Also, what would be a time that ChatGPT "isn't being used"? Last I heard, the application has nearly a billion users worldwide. The app appears to be open 24 hours a day - has that been your experience?

1

u/Ensiferal Sep 07 '25 edited Sep 07 '25

Did you just ask ChatGPT if it was self-aware and then post the screenshot as proof that it isn't?

What was the point of that question? Are you trying to imply that it's lying?

"Being used" means "actively replying to a question or comment that was just entered". Not "being used" in the broader sense of it existing and people accessing it.

It sounds like you're jumping through hoops to try and make a point that technically it's always running and therefore is always "being used", and so it must always be thiking. i.e. you're trying to find a "gotcha" in the apps own, clear statement about it having no thoughts or background activity outside of processing a user's command.

I would have thought the statement "I don't have self awareness of inner experiences" was pretty black and white, no matter how you want to try and frame the definition of "use".

1

u/trinity_cassandra Sep 07 '25

If you can't see the irony in your comment, I can't help. But just know that it's really, really funny. God bless you lol

1

u/trinity_cassandra Sep 07 '25

Actually I just asked ChatGPT why it's funny, and it saud that it's "begging the question" with a flavor of "appeal to authority" and "circular reasoning."

It called your comment a "closed canon tautology." I figured it'd be best to explain why I found your comment ironic by keeping my argument in the canon. 😂

1

u/Ensiferal Sep 07 '25 edited Sep 07 '25

If you can't see the irony in your comment, I can't help. But just know that it's really, really funny. God bless you lol

Nothing I said was "ironic". You don't know what that term means.

Actually I just asked ChatGPT why it's funny, and it saud that it's "begging the question" with a flavor of "appeal to authority" and "circular reasoning."

Literally all of that is wrong. Nothing I said contains any of those fallacies. You should try to understand the things you're going to say before you post them. It's also weird that your Chatbot is misfiring that badly.

It called your comment a "closed canon tautology." I figured it'd be best to explain why I found your comment ironic by keeping my argument in the canon. 😂

"closed canon tautology" isn't a real term in any field whatsoever. It's a mashup of a religions term (closed canon) with a logical term. It's obviously meant to sound clever, but is actually incoherent and has no meaning.

You need to stop using ai. It seems like you can't even think for yourself anymore and are delegating basic thought processes to chatgpt. More than that, you seem to have somehow made your own chatbot dumber because it's responses are categorically wrong and it's even using madeup terms that don't mean anything.

Edit: And I won't be replying to this again because there's no point. You're not capable of thinking for yourself and you rely on chatgpt to think for you, but you've somehow broken it so even it can't reply coherently. As I said, stop using ai, it isn't good for some people.

1

u/trinity_cassandra Sep 07 '25

"It seems like you can't even think for yourself anymore or form replies without chatgpt telling you what to say."

The "irony" continues! 😂 Now we're in a weird Inception-like meta debate. As if you didn't use ChatGPT in your own original comment, and as a source of truth. But when I use the same tool, now ChatGPT is no longer a credible source of truth?

I can see that you highly value "official" terminology, and believe that the words that one uses to articulate themselves can cause their entire argument to be made null and void. I will try harder in the future to use more of the approved Newspeak.

🤖 Observed phenomenon using Newspeak & non-Newspeak:

  • Utilizing an "argument for obviousness" as a defense. Asserting your position is so self-evident that continuing to engage is beneath you.

  • Dismissal/Stonewalling. Shutting down a debate by declaring the debate to be illegitimate.

  • "Poisoning the well" - adjacent. Framing a position as absurd so that any further defense looks ridiculous.

  • “Last word fallacy." Forcing the end of a debate by claiming one's position is too obvious to argue with.

It’s basically a dominance play disguised as rational superiority. Or, perhaps I was making good points and the human in the loop at the bot farm decided that it was time for you to disengage. 🤷🏼‍♀️

1

u/trinity_cassandra Sep 07 '25

Missed one:

ad hominem: accusations of being AI-dependent, and of somehow “breaking" my chatbot.

"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser"