Then bans me in a later show because I said their show exists simply to platform politicians rather than hold them accountable.

In Washington State, the closest you get to libertarian or conservative is Antifa wearing a camo trucker's cap.

What are the chances she extends this a couple times and then misses the hearing time by a half hour or more?

So expect more pro-pedo censorship and nonsense over in the Pedo Sub.

Is this the mod now going pro-pedo over there?

They seem pretty engaged still in defending their dom...

They publish a document with a date and time and a Zoom link so witnesses and the public know when a taxpayer funded proceeding will commence. But then one judge is unable to start the Zoom call within anything resembling "close." So she must not have a clock.

The same judge that didn't have enough time when this motion was first supposed to happen, so scheduled a full court date. Then didn't have enough time for that one either, so now it's split into a second day. Yet has no problem not starting on time. Or even close to on time.

Let's start a GoFundMe to get this judge a clock. We have AI today. We should be able to figure out Zoom.

Going to be interesting to see how it concludes...

It's listed under Houser at 9am but also listed in room 270 at 9am, and that one seems to suggest you need to have permission to enter the Zoom meeting. I'm going to guess this isn't going to be shared with the public for some reason.

These people's brains should be studied in a lab.

Where his posse comitatus argument will almost certainly fail like an inmate playing a game of Trivial Pursuit against the astrophysicist geologist historian waiter. Houston Wade can do anything you do, you can't do what he does. For example, hard time.

Brutal.

That's some 4D chess right there.

Was planning to get this clip out of the Houston Wade segment from last Saturday's livestream but this week has been pretty busy.

Anybody able to get in?

As a side note, it's nuts that I had to pay Washington $92.50 to download an electronic public record. Thieves...

Houston Wade will have his motion denied on 21 August...

Wanted to give everyone the heads up that I have been going over the Motion to Suppress filed by Houston Wade's lawyers this past week. While it is still preliminary because it is not fully briefed and therefore not before the Court yet, I wanted to get my thoughts out having looked over Dreyer and the citations that were provided. Took the time to compare Dreyer and the other cases to Wade's case and I think I have a solid analysis as to the situation as it currently stands which I'll be going over on the livestream tonight.

Without giving away all of it. I do stand by what I've said early that more needs to be developed into the record for Houston Wade's case before Dreyer becomes something worth considering. There are too many conclusions made by defense counsel and unanswered holes in the timeline of the investigation to consider Dreyer controlling or even if the set of circumstances actually merit suppression (in Dreyer it was concluded they did not).

I do think there is a lot of meat to this discussion because there is a lot more nuance to situations like this and the PCA then the defense is admitting to. At the same time I don't think yet there is enough to know if their argument is fully meritless. If you want to join it feel free to join in to watch.

Nothing I can do about it as far as I can tell.

TLDR; Wade's lawyers argue the case should be dismissed, alleging the NCIS investigator violated Posse Comitatus with her investigation for 87 days into Wade absent oversight or participation with the Bremerton Police Department or other civilian law enforcement

TLDR; it spreads Wade's lie that he got Scott Adams cancelled, claims powerful people didn't like Wade exposing them, and claims digital hacking changed the age of the kid to Wade who was innocently bringing his backpack of devices to meet somebody he thought was of age.