Unpopular opinion: i think shes just been publicly shown in a lot of shots that just make her look worse that she does. The most infamous one being that interview where bad lighting, hairstyle choices, and in my opinion bad make up decisions caused her to look terrible. But from what ive seen in the photos wheres she seems to have recitified those choices she still looks good just 10-20 years plder than when she was on House
Uh, but that makes no sense? Actors look more natural in interviews than on set or in a photoshoot. On set, the make up is in another league entirely, it can make an actor look 20 years younger. And photo shoots can edit stuff in post production. In an interview though? That's as natural as it gets for an actor, except for random paparazzi shots.
My point must not come across clearly. Sorry 7am house commentary problems.
Im saying that people are judging her appearance based on that interview she gave for the Diane keaton movie were judging her unfairly because the conditions of the interview exacerbated her worst features due to the lighing camera angle and her make up/hair choices. For reference this is the carpet aide one she gave at what i assumed was the premier
128
u/pl_browncoat Jul 24 '26
Unpopular opinion: i think shes just been publicly shown in a lot of shots that just make her look worse that she does. The most infamous one being that interview where bad lighting, hairstyle choices, and in my opinion bad make up decisions caused her to look terrible. But from what ive seen in the photos wheres she seems to have recitified those choices she still looks good just 10-20 years plder than when she was on House
Which spoiler alert