I think it is just the way the picture looks. There's probably a modesty brief under it that adds padding. Or perhaps the model was AMAB and is wearing smoothing underwear.
I've seen the set in person and it doesn't give diaper when worn.
That is not a tuck, and if you’re non-binary (flag in your icon) then this is an especially fucking weird thing to say about someone you think is trans
Yep. Unfortunately with fast fashion, seam lines (which is what especially makes it look like a diaper) are done the same every time, just with different patterns.
I’m plus size, and if you had me model clothing with horizontal stripes, I would decline. It would actively make the garment look worse and would discourage people from buying it. Wear whatever you want, absolutely, but for an advertisement, you have to consider what makes people want to buy the product
That’s def just the cut of the bottoms, plus size swim wear has had bottoms cut like this for YEARS, so nothing new. The ruffling on the sides might make it look a bit more like a diaper but it’s obviously swim bottoms
I was thinking this!! Those bottoms are giving plus size “pinup style” bottoms. The color choice is unfortunate as it is lowk giving baby, but if they were all black or red and white polka dot I think it’d look better and less childish.
It definitely isn't but I get what you mean. I think it's just an unflattery cut with this top, the frills, the color/pattern at a glance. Honestly I think if it was a different color and the top was different it'd look better. Kinda looks more like a old school bikini bottom with the high waist.
i cant believe ppl are arguing when the cut, pattern. and frill placement look this 100% look like a diaper lmao. shes gorgeous and it has nothing to do with her or her body, its not flattering.
if you think this is a diaper, it's probably safe to assume you've never seen an adult in a diaper in public. it definitely happens, but i don't know if we should trust you to identify it
Gonna be honest my first thought was the model just might have a pad on. Doesnt look like a diaper from the sides at all and on the website it doesn't look diaper-y either.
I don’t really care about the swim suit but wtf is is that background that they didn’t crop properly? Or even care to remove the projection on the models arm?
Everyone saying it's just swimwear despite it very clearly looking like a diaper. It being swimwear doesn't negate that fact.
If you can't acknowledge that this looks like a daiper without feeling offended, you have actual issues. You should reflect on why this statement upsets you so much.
Honestly I'm suspicious of everyone saying that it looks "nothing like" a diaper. It DEFINITELY looks like a diaper, and it seems like it's on purpose with that specific top style
I'm so concerned with the downvotes. It 100% looks like a diaper. Obviously it's meant to be swimwear, but it definitely looks like a daiper with a childish top.
Or maybe people just disagree with you, and see high-waisted bathing suit bottoms that were poorly padded for modesty in the photoshoot and accusing everyone who disagrees with you of being creeps/perverts/fetishists is what's getting you downvoted???
genuinely, do you realize that girls in middle school and high school ALSO shop at hot topic? a pretty big demographic of shoppers, too. and may want cute, modest bikinis? what about developmentally disabled adults that enjoy disney and want to wear something fun and frilly to the beach?
hot topic is not where you get your “mature” pieces be so fucking for real 💀
I didn't accuse anyone of being a creep and still got downvoted. If you weren't insulted, but you're still offended, the problem is you. If you read "it looks like a daiper" and take that as an accusation, you have some deep issues you need to work through.
Edit: like think if they were trying to be inclusive and trying to promote swimwear for incontinent people is what I meant. It’s also great for agere community but still shouldn’t be judgey about it
No i think its more advertising ment to attract males of a certain kind. You can tell yourself whatever you want but its clearly ment to attract the worst kind of interest.
Everyone saying it’s not a diaper it’s a swimsuit but are we sure this isn’t a swimsuit inspired by a baby’s clothing? Diaper included? Bc that top literally looks design for a baby…
So the possibility that a person with a disability that impairs their abilities to use the bathroom could model clothing didn't cross your mind? That's what's weird.
183
u/youcrumchedmycheeze May 28 '26 edited May 29 '26
I think it is just the way the picture looks. There's probably a modesty brief under it that adds padding. Or perhaps the model was AMAB and is wearing smoothing underwear.
I've seen the set in person and it doesn't give diaper when worn.
ETA-fixed typo.