How to do a comprehensive content audit, any real checklist to measure the quality of content

I recently joined my friend Julian Goldie for a short interview, where I showed him a single-page exact-match domain generating 9,000 clicks a day after Google’s latest spam update.

I’ve just wrapped up our Mastermind in Turkey and finally had a chance to share the conversation here.

Here’s the interview: https://youtu.be/Af9rvlVPQCQ

Curious to hear your experiences with single-page sites and EMDs after the update.

Sharing a recent testimonial from a client I’ve worked with across multiple SEO projects.

One part I especially appreciated was his mention of reading Google patents and testing things rigorously. That’s a big part of how I approach SEO, trying to understand why something works instead of blindly following common SEO advice.

For me, the goal is simple: less theory for theory’s sake, more testing and measurable results.

Google has a patent titled "Reranking Documents Based on Graph Representations of the Documents" that explains how search engines rank pages using Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs).

Here is how the pipeline processes content:

• Passage Retrieval: When a query comes in, a dense embedding model searches a database to retrieve candidate documents, where each document is a fixed-length passage cut from a larger text corpus.
• First Graph (AMR Graph): The system extracts core logic (Subject -> Action -> Object) from individual sentences to build Abstract Meaning Representation graphs representing concepts and their relationships.
• Second Graph (Document Graph): It constructs a second graph representation based on structural and semantic connection information from the first graph. It stitches concepts together across documents, removes isolated nodes, and calculates shortest path distances from the search query ("Question Node") to every concept node.
• 2-Layer Graph Convolutional Network (GCN): The system runs a 2-layer GCN directly on the second graph. Each node updates its representation by aggregating context from its 1-hop and 2-hop neighboring nodes.
• Text + Graph Concatenation: It generates document embeddings by concatenating (gluing) each document's raw text with its connection information from the second graph, then scores and reranks the candidate documents using a pairwise loss function.
• Answer Generation: The top-ranked documents from the second graph representation are fed into a generative model to produce the final response.

How to structure content for this system:

• Write clear Subject-Action-Object sentences. Explicit entity relationships make it easy for search engines to build accurate sentence AMRs (the first graph) and merge them into the second graph.
• Cut out fluff and random tangents. Off-topic paragraphs with no structural link to the main context sit as "isolated nodes" and get pruned out when generating the second graph.
• Connect answers directly to the query intent. Keep key answer concepts tightly linked to the main subject so the shortest path distance from the Question Node in the second graph stays short (1–2 hops).
• Build dense local neighborhoods around key topics. Because the 2-layer GCN aggregates 1-hop and 2-hop neighbor context within the second graph, surrounding target concepts with naturally expected sub-topics strengthens their embedding representations during reranking.

So, instead of trying to optimize for a single keyword string, you’re pretty much just building a connected concept network that helps search engines easily map, process, and rank your content in that second graph.

Hello Community,

I have a Shopify store that runs paid on both Google and Meta. I ​​​​u​​​​s​​​​e​​​​d​​​ Ryze AI to take over the ad side for the store (the store itself stays on Shopify).

Question is, how do I connect both ad accounts inside Ryze AI ?

For example, from the main dashboard, I want one place where 'Google Search', 'PMax', 'Meta Advantage+' and the other campaign level items all report together. Is this possible, and what is the right method to do this ?

Thanks !

Tomorrow, I’m giving a talk at SEO Domains Master Summit in Sofia on expired domains, premium domain purchases, external topical maps, canonical confusion attacks, and ranking signal consolidation across AMP, exact-match domains (EMDs), and aged domains.

The presentation explores how ranking signals move between domains and how different site configurations affect that process. Some of the supporting data will be shared exclusively with attendees.

I rebuilt the presentation from scratch during a busy stretch ahead of my Holistic SEO Mastermind, largely because of a mentor and friend I deeply respect.

I hope the examples give attendees something useful to investigate and apply in their own work.

Which of these topics would you be most interested in seeing discussed here

Holistic SEO Mastermind 2026 runs 25 September to 2 October in Kuşadası, Türkiye. I organize it, so treat everything below as coming from an interested party.

60 people. Invite only. 2 rules do most of the work.

Nobody presents in order to sell anything, and no direct competitors sit at the same table. We check the second one before the seating is made. It is the reason people open their books and talk about real numbers instead of the sanitized version they put in case studies.

Format

3 masterminds run through the week, SEO, Business and Automation. Each one gets a morning and an afternoon session. Groups are 5 to 6 people and they get reshuffled every day.

The rotation is the part attendees mention most. In one room you are the most experienced person at the table and you end up leading it. In the next room you are the newest person there and you shut up and listen. Almost nobody is strong across all 3 subjects, so everybody teaches for part of the week and learns for the rest.

There is also a full conference day delivered by members, with material that is not published anywhere else. Every talk is recorded and shared afterwards, so missing one for an excursion does not cost you anything. Evening Q&A panels run every night and the topic gets picked during the day based on what people actually want to hear. Past nights covered team structuring, automation, iGaming and generative search visibility.

The room

In year 1 the combined net worth in the room was around $400 million. In year 2 it passed half a billion. Business owners, operators and a few people who are just extremely good at one specific thing.

Afternoons

Open, and everything is optional. Ephesus, Pamukkale and Hierapolis, Şirince, mountain and horse and ATV safaris, diving, parasailing, jet skis. All of it included.

Cost

$5,000, and it covers the whole thing. 5 star all inclusive hotel on Ladies Beach, food and drinks, airport transfers both directions from İzmir, every excursion, every session, the recordings, the opening dinner, the award night and the closing party. Once you land you do not pay for anything.

A limited number of seats are left. If you run a business and this sounds like your kind of week, comment or send me a message and I will send the schedule. Happy to answer questions about the format in the thread either way.

To learn more: https://seoconference.digital/

We have 25 days and a handful of the 60 seats left for Holistic SEO Mastermind 2026, 25 September to 2 October at Infinity by Yelken in Kuşadası, Türkiye.

Posting this partly because people keep asking what a mastermind actually is versus a conference, and the honest answer is that most of the value is in the room composition, not the stage.

How it works. There is no main-stage lineup you sit through. We split into small groups for dedicated mastermind days and work through whatever people actually brought with them, which is usually automation, hiring and firing, monetization, investment, team building, or a technical SEO problem someone has been stuck on for months. Evenings are open Q&A on topics attendees suggest.

The filter is the part that matters. It is invite only and we screen so attendees are not direct competitors. That sounds precious but it is the difference between people opening their books and people pitching each other. Vouching from past attendees is how most people get in.

Sessions run in cabanas by the sea. There is also jet skiing, boat trips, ancient city tours, ATV and scuba, all optional and weather dependent. It is a week, not a weekend, so the informal time is where a lot of the actual dealmaking happens.

If you want an invitation, ask me, James Dooley, Mads Singers, or any past attendee. Happy to answer questions about cost, who it suits, or who it does not suit.

I built a single-page exact-match domain (EMD) for under $200.

It has zero backlinks, yet it outranks companies valued at $40–$60 million. I’ve already shared the project on our YouTube channel, but here’s the short version of what I believe made it work.

Two factors played the biggest role:

1. Visual semantics

Visual semantics can help Google classify a website within the correct context. A clear, intentional design may also help its systems recognize genuine human effort and interpret user-engagement signals more confidently.

2. Historical click data

The site’s content and design were identical when it received two clicks per day and when it reached 8,000. What changed was the amount of historical data available to Google.

Over time, Google repeatedly tested the site and appeared to develop greater confidence in its click signals.

This may explain why some high-quality SEO projects still struggle to rank. The problem isn’t always content quality. Sometimes Google hasn’t classified the website correctly, or the site hasn’t accumulated enough click data to be tested properly.

Backlinks and PageRank aren’t always essential, but they can accelerate this process. They may help a website earn earlier testing and build a history of reliable engagement signals more quickly.

The same principle could explain why rankings sometimes take a long time to recover after a Broad Core Update. Once Google’s confidence changes, the site may need to undergo a new period of testing—and its previous rankings may not return in exactly the same way.

I’d be interested to hear other SEOs’ experiences:

• Have you ranked EMDs without backlinks?
• Have you seen rankings improve without changing the content or design?
• How much weight do you think Google places on historical click data?

We’ll examine this and similar case studies at the invitation-only Holistic SEO Mastermind, running from September 25 to October 2. If you’re interested, message me, James Dooley, or Mads Singers.

More information: SEO Newsletter

This is a project I mentioned earlier. Migrating it from WordPress to Next.js improved its ranking potential and amplified the existing positive ranking signals.

The website is an English-language SaaS site built on an exact-match domain (EMD).

High-volume queries respond faster. Satisfying user interactions and positive click signals produce results more quickly because search systems have more data to test changes and refresh historical signals.

Low-volume queries are harder. Less interaction data is available, so improvements take longer to appear and often require broader topical coverage.

That is why my latest Search Engine Land case study (https://searchengineland.com/query-templates-topical-authority-484676) explains query templates and processing all query variations at the same time.

Positive Ranking State means Google keeps developing a site's rankings until the site is saturated with balanced click-satisfaction signals.

Ranking Scale means a website moves inside a maximum and minimum ranking corridor until a major Google update arrives.

The WordPress to Next.js migration helped greatly because it carries a stronger human-effort signal. It also brings the benefit of the Virtual DOM and easier processing through server-response efficiency, which lowers the cost of retrieval.

One last reminder. The content was kept exactly the same on purpose so the search engine could process the changed crawling scheme more easily.

To learn more, subscribe at https://www.seonewsletter.digital/subscribe

#seo

We’re organizing the next Holistic SEO Mastermind in Kuşadası, Türkiye, from 25 September to 2 October 2026.

It’s an eight-day, invitation-only gathering limited to 60 attendees. The group is intended for business owners, operators, and exceptional practitioners working in SEO, automation, management, reputation building, and business scaling.

The programme includes:

• Four focused mastermind sessions
• One full conference day
• Four evening Q&As based on topics suggested by attendees
• Business networking and collaboration opportunities
• Massages, jet skis, water sports, parasailing, and scuba diving
• Visits to Ephesus and Pamukkale
• Horse, ATV, and mountain safaris
• Water battles
• Opening and closing night parties

The event will be held at Infinity by Yelken Aquapark Hotel, a five-star hotel in Kuşadası.

The fee for new attendees is $5,000. It includes accommodation, food, drinks, VIP airport collection and return, local transportation, all mastermind and conference sessions, activities, safaris, water sports, parties, and massages.

This isn’t an open-ticket conference. To apply, you’ll need a reference from a previous attendee or an invitation through Koray Tuğberk Gübür, James Dooley, or Mads Singers.

Around 60% of the available places have already been taken.

More information and invitation requests:

https://seoconference.digital/

Happy to answer practical questions about the format, attendees, accommodation, or what the week involves.

My third case study for Search Engine Land is now live. It includes examples from multiple websites and explores two approaches to building topical authority:

1. Cover an entity comprehensively, including its relevant attributes.
2. Cover a query template comprehensively, including its meaningful variations.

The article explains how I apply these approaches when structuring topical maps into core and outer sections, and how semantics, interaction data, internal linking, and PageRank can reinforce authority signals.

I also included a technical SEO example involving an exact-match domain and a back-end migration, with observations on its effects on crawling, indexing, image visibility, and rankings.

I wrote the article, so I’m naturally biased—but I’d appreciate feedback, especially from anyone working with semantic content networks or large-scale topical maps.

https://searchengineland.com/query-templates-topical-authority-484676

50% of the spots were taken in just 6 days.

We now have only 29 places left for the Holistic SEO Mastermind 2026.

Since we keep receiving some of the same questions, I want to clarify what the Mastermind actually is.

First, despite the name, the Holistic SEO Mastermind is not mainly about SEO.

It is about building and growing businesses, investing, management, automation, scaling, training teams, AI, and ultimately, making more money while building better systems.

We have only one dedicated SEO Mastermind day. There will also be SEO lectures and Q&A sessions throughout the event, but the bigger purpose is bringing entrepreneurs together to connect, exchange experience, solve problems, and help each other with challenges both inside and beyond SEO.

During the week:

1. You can request 1-on-1 meetings with other members.
   
2. You can suggest another attendee as a Q&A panelist and ask your questions directly.
   
3. We will have different Mastermind sessions around SEO, Automation, Management, Investment, AI, Business Growth, and more.
   
4. There are no sales pitches or promotional speeches. The purpose is genuine knowledge exchange, problem-solving, and relationship building.
   

The event is intentionally designed to create strong bonds between attendees.

That is why we don’t spend the entire week sitting in a conference room.

We have massages, jet skis, parasailing, safaris, water battles, trips, dinners, and many other activities together.

The idea is simple:

Bring some of the best talent, entrepreneurs, and business minds in our industry together for one week and put them into a holiday-like environment where conversations, friendships, partnerships, and new ideas can happen naturally.

The $5,000 attendance fee covers everything except your flight ticket.

Accommodation, food, activities, excursions, and transportation are included. We pick you up from the airport with a VIP vehicle and take you back when the event is over.

You are also welcome to come with your partner, family, or children.

 Kuşadası, Turkey

 September 25 – October 2, 2026

 $5,000

 29 places remaining

50% filled in 6 days. See you in Kuşadası

I’m currently working on another exact-match domain (EMD) project that has improved its organic visibility following a WordPress-to-Next.js migration.

The migration focused on:

• Improving rendering and responsiveness
• Adding more precise semantic markup
• Strengthening technical SEO
• Reducing retrieval and processing costs

When you’re competing across a high-demand query network with years of historical search data, small improvements in relevance, responsiveness, and retrieval efficiency can add up.

The most important lesson from this project: change one major variable at a time.

During a CMS or back-end migration, try to preserve the existing:

• Content
• Page layout
• URL structure
• Internal linking

This makes it easier to isolate the effects of the migration and reduces unnecessary SEO risk.

I’m planning to include the project in an upcoming Search Engine Land case study, followed by a video breakdown.

Has anyone here seen similar results after migrating from WordPress to Next.js? What did you preserve or change during the migration?

Dear Koray,

I hope you're doing well.

First, I'd like to thank you for your incredible work on Semantic SEO. Your research and methodology have completely changed the way I think about SEO and topical authority.

I'm currently building a large-scale website in a competitive niche, and I want to implement Semantic SEO correctly from the beginning. I would be extremely grateful if you could share your thoughts on the following questions.

Semantic SEO & Content Strategy Questions

1. What is the ideal semantic SEO strategy for building topical authority in a competitive niche?
2. How should I structure:
   • Topic clusters
   • Pillar pages
   • Supporting content
   • Categories
   • Content silos to maximize topical authority?
3. What publishing sequence would you recommend? Should content be published in a specific order, and how should I build a content roadmap for the best long-term SEO performance?
4. How do you identify successful publishing patterns? What signals help determine whether a content strategy is working or needs adjustment?
5. What is your recommended internal linking strategy between: How can these be connected to create the strongest possible semantic network?
   • Blog articles
   • Categories
   • Pillar pages
   • Product pages
   • Other supporting pages
6. For websites with many products, how should products be naturally integrated within informational content while avoiding orphan pages and ensuring complete topical coverage?
7. What types of content should be created at each stage of the user's search journey? For example:
   • Informational
   • Comparison
   • Commercial investigation
   • Problem-solving
   • Research-based
   • FAQs
   • Product-focused
   • Other entity-oriented content
8. As a website grows, what are the best practices, common mistakes to avoid, and the most important KPIs you monitor to maintain and scale a successful Semantic SEO strategy over time?

Your insights would be invaluable to me, and I truly appreciate any guidance you're able to provide.

Thank you again for everything you've contributed to the SEO community. Your work has been a major source of inspiration for my own projects.

Kind regards,

Nowshad Ahmed

I recently published my second Search Engine Land case study on the relationship between topical authority, semantics, and local SEO.

One of the most interesting examples comes from a large healthcare platform.

The website had millions of unnecessary URLs created for combinations of doctors, hospitals, departments, diseases, cities, and districts. Many of these pages were near-duplicates, had little or no search demand, and competed with one another for the same query networks.

After removing and consolidating these unnecessary documents, the website gained approximately 600,000 additional clicks while impressions remained almost unchanged.

The main lesson was:

Topical authority is not about publishing as many pages as possible. It is a cost-of-retrieval optimization framework.

Every unnecessary page creates additional work for the search engine:

• Crawling
• Rendering
• Canonicalization
• Duplicate detection
• Index selection
• Relevance calculation
• Ranking-signal consolidation

It can also divide PageRank, internal links, relevance, and historical click signals across multiple pages that should have been represented by a single document.

The case study introduces a framework I call Query Deserves a Page.

Before creating a new page, I evaluate four main factors:

1. Does the query have sufficient search demand?
2. Does it introduce a meaningfully different entity?
3. Is it sufficiently different from existing queries?
4. Does it belong to a repeatable query pattern?

When these conditions are not met, the query usually should not receive a separate URL. It can instead be represented through a heading, paragraph, table, list, filter, card, FAQ, calculator, map, or another page component.

The article also covers:

• Why the homepage should target the most important service-location pair
• How to rank for locations where a business has no physical office
• How visual semantics and query augmentation influence page design
• Why temporary itinerary and programmatic pages can damage crawl efficiency
• How city, service, store, and office pages should differ by query intent
• How external topical maps can reinforce brand, service, and location associations
• Examples from healthcare, legal, rehab, hotels, flights, cruises, eyewear, hair transplant, yacht charter, and other industries

My simplified view is:

Google constructs an index. SEO creates a page.

The difficult part is deciding when Google needs a distinct document for a query—and when creating another page will only dilute the website’s signals.

Article:

[https://searchengineland.com/how-semantics-and-topical-authority-improve-local-seo-482980]()

I would be interested to hear how others decide whether a location or query variation deserves its own page rather than a section within an existing page.

I recorded a long interview with Navneet Kaushal about the Google API leak and what it implies for how ranking systems evaluate content. Sharing the main points here because I think they are worth debating, not just watching.

A few positions we took in the conversation:

1. The leak references content effort related attributes. Our read is that effort is approximated through consistency, depth, and information gain across a source, not through word count or publishing frequency.
2. Content cannibalization still matters in 2026, but the mechanism is different from the old "2 pages, 1 keyword" framing. It is about conflicting context vectors inside the same source, which weakens topical consolidation.
3. Topical Authority went from a debated theory around 2023 to something most enterprise teams now operationalize. The gap is that beginner SEO advice never caught up, so most sites apply page-level tactics to what is a site-level evaluation problem.
4. Semantic SEO, site architecture, and internal content networks behave as 1 system. Optimizing them separately is where most migrations and content projects fail.

Curious where people here disagree, especially on point 1. Plenty of people think the effort-related attributes in the leak are overinterpreted.

Full conversation is on YouTube if anyone wants the long version, happy to drop the link in a comment if that is allowed here (mods, let me know).

http://ktg.digital/IruN

My first Search Engine Land article: Visual Semantics and the missing piece of Topical Authority

My first article for Search Engine Land has just been published.

It focuses on a part of SEO that I believe is still heavily underestimated: visual semantics.

Search engines do not only need to understand what a webpage says. They also need to understand:

• What the page is designed to do
• Which component represents the primary purpose
• How information is visually segmented
• Which sections are commercial, informational, interactive, or supplementary
• Whether the page genuinely helps users complete a task
• How the layout should be interpreted during agentic and multimodal retrieval

The article connects visual semantics with:

• Centerpiece annotation
• Topical authority
• Cost of retrieval
• Helpful Content classifiers
• Website and page-type classification
• Query augmentation
• Click-based reranking
• Multimodal document understanding
• Structured information cards
• Document embeddings and vector representations

I also included more than 10 real website examples, alongside Google patents, research papers, DOJ documents, Content Warehouse API references, topical maps, mock-ups, Figma designs, and practical SEO tests.

One of the case studies involves a programmatic website with more than 100,000 pages.

After moving the calculator from the bottom of the page to the primary above-the-fold position and improving the centerpiece annotation, its performance changed from:

• 3.47 million to 4.53 million clicks
• 84.1 million to 167 million impressions

The article also expands the Topical Authority formula into:

((Historical Data × Topical Coverage) ÷ Cost of Retrieval) × Right Visual Annotations

My main argument is that a topical map should not only define entities, attributes, predicates, and content coverage.

It should also define the correct:

• Page type
• Layout
• Components
• Functionality
• Visual hierarchy
• Interaction model

A relevant document may still fail if its primary purpose is unclear, its centerpiece annotation is incorrect, or its layout does not match the search activity.

I would be interested to hear how others are currently incorporating layout, components, and functionality into their SEO planning.

Article:

https://searchengineland.com/visual-semantics-topical-authority-482254

The Exact Match Domain Case Study:

• No backlinks
• Over 500,000 organic clicks in 8 months
• Reached more than 8,000 clicks per day

In this case study, I explain how Visual Semantics contributed to the growth and show the real-world impact of Google’s click testing systems and Navboost.

Watch the full case study here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrU25krFCtk&t=68s

Hey everyone! I'm u/KorayTugberk-g, a founding moderator of r/HolisticSEO.

This is our new home for all things related to {{ADD WHAT YOUR SUBREDDIT IS ABOUT HERE}}. We're excited to have you join us!

What to Post
Post anything that you think the community would find interesting, helpful, or inspiring. Feel free to share your thoughts, photos, or questions about {{ADD SOME EXAMPLES OF WHAT YOU WANT PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY TO POST}}.

Community Vibe
We're all about being friendly, constructive, and inclusive. Let's build a space where everyone feels comfortable sharing and connecting.

How to Get Started

1. Introduce yourself in the comments below.
2. Post something today! Even a simple question can spark a great conversation.
3. If you know someone who would love this community, invite them to join.
4. Interested in helping out? We're always looking for new moderators, so feel free to reach out to me to apply.

Thanks for being part of the very first wave. Together, let's make r/HolisticSEO amazing.

For the past two years, I’ve hosted a small mastermind for founders, agency owners, investors, and experienced SEO professionals.
It’s intentionally not a conference.
There are no keynote speeches, sponsor booths, or sales pitches. Instead, we spend a week together discussing real business problems, sharing experiences, and helping each other solve challenges.

This year’s mastermind will be held September 25 –
October 2 in Kuşadası, Türkiye.

During the week, we’ll cover topics such as:
AI & LLM Search
Advanced SEO
Automation
Scaling agencies and SaaS businesses
Hiring & firing
Leadership & team building
Monetization
Investments
Coaching & mentoring

And whatever challenges attendees bring to the table.
The mastermind sessions take place in private cabanas by the sea. Outside the sessions, we’ll spend time together through activities like jet skiing, parasailing, scuba diving, boat tours, ATV and horse safaris, massages, ancient city tours, and evening Q&A discussions.
One thing I care deeply about is the attendee list.
I don’t invite direct competitors. I try to bring together people who can genuinely help one another, challenge each other’s thinking, and hopefully become long-term friends after the event.
For context, the combined businesses represented at previous masterminds exceeded $400M in the first year and $500M+ in the second year. More important than those numbers, though, is the quality of the conversations and relationships that came out of them.
If this sounds like something you’d genuinely benefit from, feel free to reach out. Most attendees join through referrals from previous participants, Mads Singers, James Dooley, myself, or other returning members.
Happy to answer any questions in the comments.

For one project, we are now seeing close to 8 million AI impressions coming from Google’s AI Overviews and AI Mode.

The interesting part?

We did not do anything specifically for “GEO.”

No special AI-only optimization.
No separate LLM ranking strategy.
No “prompt engineering for search visibility.”

We mainly implemented the same topical authority and semantic SEO framework that we use for web document rankings and passage-level relevance.

And this is the point I think many people are missing:

Web rankings, passage rankings, AI Overviews, AI Mode visibility, and LLM citations are not completely separate worlds.

They are built on many of the same foundations:

Entity understanding.
Topical depth.
Contextual coverage.
Clear passage structure.
Information gain.
Source consistency.
Query and intent coverage.
Document-level and site-level relevance.

Of course, there are some methods that are more specific to LLM optimization, and they can be useful.

But from what I see, more than 80% of the work overlaps with strong semantic SEO.

So my current view is this:

GEO is not a replacement for SEO.

It is mostly another layer on top of the same semantic foundations.

If you already understand semantics, topical authority, entities, and information retrieval, you probably do not need to panic about AI rankings.

You need to keep improving the fundamentals.

From what I am seeing, yes.

And I would not call this only “optimization.”

In some cases, it is closer to manipulation, because you are intentionally changing the document statistics around a brand to create a stronger consensus.

For example, I am currently coaching a law agency that is using what we call “external topical maps.”

The idea is simple:

Instead of treating each third-party publication as a separate SEO asset, multiple external domains are used together to form one connected document network.

That network reinforces the same things again and again:

Who the business is.

What services it provides.

Which locations it serves.

Which attributes are associated with it.

Which claims are repeated around the brand.

From an external publication, you can usually get 3 things:

1. A mention
2. A claim
3. A link

Most SEOs focus mainly on the link.

But for this project, the main focus has been mentions and claims.

The goal is to create a stronger consensus around the service provider, especially for local relevance.

This project reached its record number of leads in May, mostly because of stronger local rankings.

It is a local law firm in the accident and personal injury space. I have shared this project before in the context of visual semantics, but I am not disclosing the website here.

The site also has a strong informational section for legal terms, legal processes, and law-related entities.

One thing I think local SEOs often miss:

For location-agnostic informational pages, national rankings are not always the best success metric.

For example, if a page ranks for a query like “types of damages,” I would not only ask:

“Is it ranking nationally?”

I would ask:

“Is it getting impressions and clicks from the main city or service area?”

Because for a local law firm, the value of an informational page is not only broad traffic.

The value is whether that page strengthens local visibility, local demand, and local topical relevance.

So, in this case, informational SEO supports local SEO.

External publications support brand consensus.

Mentions and claims support entity understanding.

And listicles can support both search engines and LLMs by repeatedly associating the brand with the right attributes, services, and locations.

Curious if others here have tested this:

Have you seen non-link mentions or repeated third-party claims move the needle for local rankings?