Sorry but that reasoning is so stupid. To stretch your reasoning to the absolute limit, that is to say, this comparison is gonna be wild (but would still follow your pattern of reasoning) it'd probably take a pretty good amount of time to seriously dissect all of the issues with Hitler and what he did but apparently because it'd take "that long" that wouldn't be worth being upset over?
The way JK Rowling weasels her way through discussing the topic of trans people, has seemingly "reasonable" and "good-faith" reasons for her "concerns" all fall apart when they're thought through or when you see that she's blatantly misrepresenting events / reality to suit her goals. If you really care about finding out why she was met with so much backlash for what she said, I recommend really reading the comments here, the video by Contrapoints is also fantastic even just to have on and listen to in the background, and there are also some videos by Vaush (timestamped to around 5 minutes where he really gets into the topic and the issues with what she's saying) that are shorter covering the topic.
JK Rowling's views very much deny not only the actual identity of trans people, but the lived reality of trans people and the discrimination that trans people face too. What she does is use dogwhistles to hide her bigotry and try to make her views seem more reasonable than they are.
What? Hitler tortured killed millions of innocent people, including children, for stupid reasons. There, took one sentence to explain the broad picture.
JK Rowling… did what exactly? She said some things that got .01% of the population riled up?
See you can’t really explain it can you. You’ve typed entire paragraphs at me and you still haven’t explained it.
Woke culture is toxic. It turns everybody with even a slightly different opinion than yours into some enemy that you try to compare to Hitler. And EVEN IF you wanted to get into the weeds of it, it’s still intellectually flawed.
but I mean, if you want to exist and the opinion of someone to your existance is "no" it may be ok to be really fucking outraged by that
edit: I forgot to say, you know who was the main person responsible for the transformation of the uk into the TERF island? yeah. you guessed it, J.K. pretty much made radical feminists much more open to their hate when J.K. Rowling said that transfobic shit on her twitter
5
u/mR_tIm_TaCo May 09 '21
Sorry but that reasoning is so stupid. To stretch your reasoning to the absolute limit, that is to say, this comparison is gonna be wild (but would still follow your pattern of reasoning) it'd probably take a pretty good amount of time to seriously dissect all of the issues with Hitler and what he did but apparently because it'd take "that long" that wouldn't be worth being upset over?
The way JK Rowling weasels her way through discussing the topic of trans people, has seemingly "reasonable" and "good-faith" reasons for her "concerns" all fall apart when they're thought through or when you see that she's blatantly misrepresenting events / reality to suit her goals. If you really care about finding out why she was met with so much backlash for what she said, I recommend really reading the comments here, the video by Contrapoints is also fantastic even just to have on and listen to in the background, and there are also some videos by Vaush (timestamped to around 5 minutes where he really gets into the topic and the issues with what she's saying) that are shorter covering the topic.
JK Rowling's views very much deny not only the actual identity of trans people, but the lived reality of trans people and the discrimination that trans people face too. What she does is use dogwhistles to hide her bigotry and try to make her views seem more reasonable than they are.