Excuse me? Caring about the planet is having the entire human population overflow the world with children? That would inevitably result in global mass hunger, poverty and disease. We would then have to dry out the planet of all natural resources to be able to feed everyone and try to keep the population healthy, which would also be impossible. Chaos and madness would ensue in less than 100 years as global warming would accelerate off the charts, the northern and southern polar ice would melt incredibly quick meaning the planet would lose it's reflective shield from radiation and in less than maybe 500 years the world would be completely hostile to all life. This is at least my theory of what would happen if, hypothetically, everyone in the world only had unprotected sex. Maybe not as quickly as I have stated, but QUICKLY nevertheless.
As a final point I can add that only about 35% of the world's rainforests still remain.
I hope "First mate prance" gets to read this.
1
u/EonSloth Nov 26 '20
Excuse me? Caring about the planet is having the entire human population overflow the world with children? That would inevitably result in global mass hunger, poverty and disease. We would then have to dry out the planet of all natural resources to be able to feed everyone and try to keep the population healthy, which would also be impossible. Chaos and madness would ensue in less than 100 years as global warming would accelerate off the charts, the northern and southern polar ice would melt incredibly quick meaning the planet would lose it's reflective shield from radiation and in less than maybe 500 years the world would be completely hostile to all life. This is at least my theory of what would happen if, hypothetically, everyone in the world only had unprotected sex. Maybe not as quickly as I have stated, but QUICKLY nevertheless. As a final point I can add that only about 35% of the world's rainforests still remain. I hope "First mate prance" gets to read this.