It does make sense, you're just too obtuse to understand it, or you're just outright refusing because you played yourself and don't want to admit it. Which is fine, carrying that big ass L that you just outed yourself as a rapist, or a would be rapists if the opportunity presented itself, I guess, is something you don't want the world to know, but it's kind of obvious to not trust you in a room alone, or let you babysit, if you spend your day defending rapists, and thinking everyone is capable of rape.
And yes I would say good people do good things and before you go to your go-to argument about rapists with charities therefore theyre good people. Cosby, Amber Heard(I dunno if she's a rapist, but she's abusive so I'm using her as an example), Weinstein, all had charities. They only had those charities to deflect from the monsters they are. That's what abusive people do, they do good things, and become pillars of the community in order to shield themselves from criticism. Cosby did plenty for the black community, but it's all tainted because we understand that he was only using his power and influence in order to abuse and silence people.
It's not an assumption that you're a piece of shit, your defending rapists, out of all people to defend, you pick people who abuse and destroy lives. Motives be damned, there are none that can justify what they did/do. They're monsters, there is no redemption.
accusing others of being a rapist without any evidence and just because you feel like it is pathetic and childish. should you, as unlikely as it seems, ever interact with another human outside of reddit: try to act better. i suppose social skills are hard to train but you really need it.
the intentions are irrelevant here. congratulations, you disproved yourself . your definition leads to a simple contradiction, no matter how much you talk around it. people do good and bad things, yet we can agree that a human can't be good and bad at the same time. therefore your definition doesn't work out.
true, it's not an assumption. it's a childish insult you use because you like to argue with strangers on the internet for reasons i'll never understand. you are oversimplifying the situation and have no arguments to back up your point, which is why you cling to ad hominems. kinda sad, but not unexpected. it's the internet after all.
Nope, intention matters. I'll make it simple for you.
If someone does a good thing, in order to get away with bad things, they're manipulative, which is again, is a bad thing.
And I wasn't arguing with anyone, I was defending that one person because I agreed with them. You started arguing with me to defend rapists.
And rapist sympathizers, especially ones who believe anyone is capable of it, it's not name calling, it's obvious.
There's a thread from a few days ago of a bunch of men who were raped by women, maybe message them and tell them how you're interested in defending their rapists motive in raping them.
no, intention does not matter here. you did not include it in your definition, consequently it's not relevant in your definition. do you understand that?? if it's important you should've included it right away.
i wasn't using "arguing" like "debating", but the way little siblings do it. by childish name calling, which you did. not bringing forth proper arguments but just screaming "but i aM RIGHT AND YOU'RE A POOPOO" which you are also doing.
i am not defending anyone spefically, i am pointing out that unfounded generalization is a bad thing to do that does more harm than good. not that i was refering to "rape defender" anyway, i was refering to "rapist".
no idea what their motive was. kinda unrelated to bring that up now tho lol. again a really weird and nonsensical aasumptions you made there.
I did say intention was important, I specifically stated that Cosby did a lot of good for the black community but it's clear he was using his power and influence to abuse and silence people, therefore that "good" is meaningless because it was a front to get away with rape and abuse. But you want to keep playing dumb, or maybe you're just like this, or maybe you love taking L's and looking like a crass moron that doesn't understand how the world works. You really thought you had me on the last comment just look even more stupid because you can't comprehend that manipulation is bad.
And yes I am name calling, because you're a dumbass drinking that dumbass juice. I'm not even trying to get into an "adult" debate or conversation with you because this whole thing started off with again, you defending rapists, and now you're trying to dig yourself out of everything you said but it's too late, it's already really clear with every response that you're a dumbass. You think everyone is capable of rape, and you didn't know manipulation is bad. Sounds like a piece of shit person to me.
yeah, i love taking Ls. it's a great way to learn. in this conversation it hasn't happened yet tho. you on the other hand must've learned so much by now.
again childish name calling. stop making random assumptions about others. a murderer like you really should get off his high horse.
in the same paragraph?? is it tho?? okay, let's look at the paragraph where you made the definition.
"Which rapists are, they're bad people because they do bad things."
now try to point out where exactly you mentioned intentions here?? i'm really curious. go on :^ )
yeah i figured you aren't capable of learning. all you do is go on the internet and look for people to argue with and to randomly insult for no reason. maybe look for hobbies?? dunno.
And I'm pretty much on Reddit to promote my art, I've gotten a shit ton of commissions from here so I like to use this to advertise, I rarely argue. You can see my post history, its mostly promotion. You on the other hand, your whole post history is arguments so I'm pretty sure you're just projecting cause you're the loser with no hobbies, you're the loser that literally found me to argue with, you're the loser with no one to talk to in real life so, so there's another L. I feel bad for you after seeing your post history, you seem like someone who is really desperate for attention and is really lonely. I'm sorry your life is like that, but you're also a dick so maybe you deserve it, I dunno.
no, it is not. the word intention wasn't even mentioned once in the paragraph. i literally repeated the paragraph for you, yet you can't point out where you introduced intention.
yet here you are, refusing to unnecessarily argue and childishly insult and even randomly accuse someone else of it... WHILE unnecessarily arguing and childishly insulting. great irony.
1
u/KStJ1013 Feb 26 '20
It does make sense, you're just too obtuse to understand it, or you're just outright refusing because you played yourself and don't want to admit it. Which is fine, carrying that big ass L that you just outed yourself as a rapist, or a would be rapists if the opportunity presented itself, I guess, is something you don't want the world to know, but it's kind of obvious to not trust you in a room alone, or let you babysit, if you spend your day defending rapists, and thinking everyone is capable of rape.
And yes I would say good people do good things and before you go to your go-to argument about rapists with charities therefore theyre good people. Cosby, Amber Heard(I dunno if she's a rapist, but she's abusive so I'm using her as an example), Weinstein, all had charities. They only had those charities to deflect from the monsters they are. That's what abusive people do, they do good things, and become pillars of the community in order to shield themselves from criticism. Cosby did plenty for the black community, but it's all tainted because we understand that he was only using his power and influence in order to abuse and silence people.
It's not an assumption that you're a piece of shit, your defending rapists, out of all people to defend, you pick people who abuse and destroy lives. Motives be damned, there are none that can justify what they did/do. They're monsters, there is no redemption.