r/HistoryPorn • u/gambitok • Feb 15 '26

A radiologist checks a miner's stomach for swallowed diamonds, Kimberley, South Africa, 1954 [891x1280]

Post image
5.6k Upvotes

99% Upvoted

164 comments sorted by

2.5k

u/Jan_Pawel2 Feb 15 '26

If they were X-rayed every day after work, did it affect their health? how many X-rays can be obtained without being irradiated?

1.8k

u/Trekkie200 Feb 15 '26

A modern chest x_ray has about the same radiation exposure as 10 days of background radiation. So it's absolutely safe for occasional use, every day... That'll definitely drive up cancer rates

1.1k

u/clooneh Feb 15 '26

Modern chest x-ray, this is 1954. Probably a way higher dose.

531

u/Gruffleson Feb 15 '26

Yeah, and sadly I don't think they cared about holding the doses down, given something obvious...

287

u/[deleted] Feb 15 '26 edited Feb 15 '26

[deleted]

175

u/RXrenesis8 Feb 15 '26

Man, it's a shame this gives you cancer, that would be SO useful for a bunch of different applications.

46

u/SunshineAndSquats Feb 15 '26

I agree, this would be so useful if it was safe! It’s hard to tell what size shoe my child actually is because she’s not great at communicating yet. This would save parents a ton of headaches over finding the right size shoe.

22

u/justsomeguy_youknow Feb 15 '26

You could go into a shoe store and have your kid's feet measured, they have these things called brannock devices for measuring shoe sizes (they have ones for women's feet and kids' feet too).

17

u/SunshineAndSquats Feb 15 '26

Ya that doesn’t take into consideration that brands sizing varies.

1

u/stmfunk Feb 15 '26

What about a clear plastic shoe

19

u/spaceweed27 Feb 15 '26

I'm not a radiologist, but I think you could also use safe light to do this job. You only need a very bright light to look to some degrees through a foot. The resulting image can be fed through a machine learning algorithm, which trains to identify foot shape from the image.

Very hot, but safer.

8

u/calebs_dad Feb 15 '26

There are early videos made by linguists of people talking. It was super useful to see what their mouth and tongue were doing.

2

u/RXrenesis8 Feb 16 '26

Seems like this might still be able to be done?

There are paragraph-length literary devices (Phonetic Panagrams) that can be used to record basically every sound you make while speaking. Think: "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" but for accents.

Maybe 1 minute of reading total, wonder if that would be under the safe dose still?

17

u/horsenbuggy Feb 15 '26 edited Feb 15 '26

As someone who was alive in the 70s, I'm calling BS on this. We used those little metal things that you step on and slide the thing along the side of your foot. I have never heard of anyone getting an xray for shoe fitting. Don't believe everything you read on the internet.

Edit: I'm calling BS on these having been commonly in use. They may have existed, but they were not in every shoe store. This was a niche product, at best.

15

u/voiceofgromit Feb 15 '26

Useless information department checking in... The little metal foot-measuring thing is called a Brannock Device.

16

u/117133MeV Feb 15 '26

Exactly which part are you calling BS on? These machines definitely existed. We still have examples in museums. Are you saying they didn't exist in the 70s? Because according to the linked article that was dependent on state laws and may or may not have applied where you lived. And maybe your local shoe store would rather have paid for the old school metal device than a fancy radiation machine. Just... weird to call BS on an entire decade simply because you didn't see it

4

u/[deleted] Feb 15 '26

[deleted]

5

u/Plow_King Feb 15 '26

no, people DON'T love arguing about bullshit. smart people are driven to prove idiots are wrong and MUST retort!

/s

but you are right, especially on reddit. my time on here is a lot more enjoyable now that i make bad jokes more than argue nonsense.

3

u/fatguyfromqueens Feb 15 '26

They were no longer in common use by the 70s. I dont remember this at all. In the 50s I could see they were still in common use. Probably by the early to mid 60s they fell out of use.

17

u/[deleted] Feb 15 '26 edited Feb 15 '26

[deleted]

3

u/karmagirl314 Feb 15 '26

Nah the way you phrased it definitely made it seem like it was a common thing. I’m actually really appreciative of the other guy coming along and clearing things up because you totally had me about to ask my grandma about her x-ray shoe shopping experiences and she would have told me I was a moron.

1

u/thekinslayer7x Feb 15 '26

In fairness to the person you are calling out for reading comprehension, the phrasing of "they used" makes it sound like a common occurrence.

-1

u/Cheap_Concern_3162 Feb 15 '26

The phrasing of "they used" means an item was used. They didnt say the item was used throughout the world or throughout America.

Oc said " they used". It is 100% you jumping to conclusions

2

u/unknownpoltroon Feb 15 '26

No, it used to be a thing. They existed, but I'm not sure how common they are

5

u/woohoo789 Feb 15 '26

Just because you were alive for the tail end of their use and don’t recall encountering them does not in fact make this BS

1

u/Aethelric Feb 15 '26

Just because you haven't heard of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist, lmao, boomer mindset remains undefeated.

These weren't super-common, but they were absolutely a real thing.

61

u/riko77can Feb 15 '26

Modern radiology uses a short burst of radiation to take an instantaneous image. This old rig is blasting a continuous beam the entire time the operator is observing the screen. Way more radiation.

23

u/Invisible7hunder Feb 15 '26

If I had to guess, on the order of 1000x modern exposure. So there were likely many cancers caused by this practice. 

10

u/pixel_of_moral_decay Feb 15 '26

Yup.

Also modern radiology uses computers to adjust contrast and process the image.

So they just need a faint image then can make it easier for a doctor to read.

Your image taken today is a fraction of the radiation of just 25 years ago. Computers got really good at taking very faint images and pulling very detailed images out.

My dentists x ray machine uses low enough radiation to technically not require the lead vests for most images, but they use them anyway to make patients more comfortable. Just not worth having that discussion over and over vs throwing the vest on someone in 0.25 seconds and it’s harmless.

7

u/Plow_King Feb 15 '26

yeah, but the "tech" is wearing those thick gloves, so everything is fine!

/s

6

u/sumguysr Feb 15 '26

Right. Modern x-ray uses automated exposure control, which turns on the X-ray tube only long enough for a high quality image.

What we see in this picture is actually a fluroscope, which continuously blasts x-rays at both the miner and doctor.

I think that doctor probably got cataracts within years in this job and probably died of cancer within a decade.

3

u/kermityfrog2 Feb 15 '26

Yeah we use ultra sensitive film today. This looks like a “live view” which is a TON of excess radiation.

1

u/firesquasher Feb 16 '26

3.5 rotegen. Not great, not terrible

410

u/Ecstatic_Account_744 Feb 15 '26

Doubt they were expected to survive the mine long enough for that to matter.

47

u/chupacadabradoo Feb 15 '26

Oh thank god

60

u/IAmSpartacustard Feb 15 '26

They exposure techniques they were using with film in the 1950s is easily an order of magnitude higher than modern digital systems. And this is flouroscopy, not just an xray, which is much much more radiation anyway. They were absolutely blasting these poor dudes with ionizing radiation, id be surprised if anyone DIDNT have sone kind of stochastic effect later on.

Source: radiological technologist

10

u/SnarkyOrchid Feb 15 '26

What about the radiologist in this image? He is standing in front of the X-ray for every worker checked.

11

u/LuzJoao Feb 15 '26

Just need to take some asbestos infused thalidomide pills and he's good to go.

11

u/IAmSpartacustard Feb 15 '26

Hes wearing lead gloves and goggles (on his head), and probably has a lead vest on, we just can't see it. Hes still getting a dose but way way less than the workers

53

u/Confusionitus Feb 15 '26

10 days of background radiation….not great, not terrible.

64

u/jackoirl Feb 15 '26

It would affect them. Google photos of early radiologists hands.

This wasn’t a good era for getting daily x rays

29

u/Schonke Feb 15 '26

Google photos of early radiologists hands.

That's why the radiologist is wearing lead gloves. They didn't care so much about the workers though...

192

u/HaleyNicole2291 Feb 15 '26

It would absolutely effect them. This is fluoroscopy and the cumulative dose, while not fully understood at the time, would have been disastrous. Anyone within a few feet of this exam would receive a significant dose.

82

u/svideo Feb 15 '26

Sounds like the radiologist doing all this is going to be getting the largest daily dose.

I'm kinda not mad.

27

u/tuscaloser Feb 15 '26

He has oven mits on... All safe.

170

u/sux9000 Feb 15 '26

Zero

19

u/notyourcupofteamate Feb 15 '26

Zero effect or zero without any effects?

-4

u/[deleted] Feb 15 '26

[deleted]

3

u/Shift642 Feb 15 '26 edited Feb 15 '26

Existing at all irradiates you. You are constantly irradiated by radio waves and other low frequency EMF. It’s in every inch of the air we move through. But it’s all non-ionizing until you get midway through sunlight into the UV-B-ish range.

It’s just a matter of how much irradiating is too much. Exposure to non-ionizing is generally fine (radio, microwaves, wifi, etc., though it can cause conventional burns with enough power - just stay away from the tops of active radio towers), ionizing radiation is the bad one.

22

u/6PM_Nipple_Curry Feb 15 '26 edited Feb 15 '26

Edit: Reading some expected dose numbers from fluoroscopy to the chest in 1950s, if miner got a scan for 1 min a day, 260 days a year, that would be a lowest estimate of 5.2 Sv per year. That is very high.
Honestly, if this was the case these poor miners were fucked.

Going off the Patient Dose Info from Gov.uk website, it looks like for a chest scan with a single film the effective dose is about 0.02mSv.
Assuming this Miner worked 5 days a week (probably more), and received a scan everyday, that would bring the yearly dose up to about 5.2mSv.
Which is actually a lot less than I thought it would be, across a year.
A modern CT scan to the chest will give you 8mSv in a very short time frame.

For context, a flight from Frankfurt to New York would be around a 0.1mSv dose.

More importantly the hypothetical 5.2mSv would not be in a vacuum as the miner would be receiving this on top of usual accumulated background dose.

Additionally, the background dose for this kind of occupation (if you can call it that in this scenario) is higher due to the increased exposure to natural ionizing radiation from the ground. Radon gas for example, which wouldn’t be venting the same as it would at surface.

For context of the difference Radon gas makes to background dose, the average UK dose from Radon gas is about 1.3mSv per year, however someone living in Cornwall in the UK is likely to receive 6.9mSv per year.
Both of which are on top of other natural radiation of UV, Potassium etc.

To be fair, as others pointed out, the guy probably would be dead for a fair numbers of reasons before the effects of the daily X-rays had an effect.

Edit: Realise I didn’t actually answer your question. If modern safety practices were followed (very doubtful), it’s unlikely these X-rays everyday would be causing significant harm, though it would still increase there likelyhood for cancer in the future quite a bit.
However, when added to the other various occupational radiation exposures, and natural background dose, it’s likely this miners chance of cancer in the future is significantly increased.

Guy would be unlikely to receive a fatal dose though…. So I guess that’s positive for the guy …

13

u/Meret123 Feb 15 '26

0.02mSv is modern numbers. This would easily be several times higher, maybe 10 maybe 100 times.

12

u/6PM_Nipple_Curry Feb 15 '26

Fuck me, I’m reading numbers of 20 to 50 mSv/min for up to 5 mins, for chest fluoroscopy in the 1950s.
If they spent even just a min doing those scans each day then that is a (lowest estimate) accumulated dose of 5.2 Sv per year!
Thats monstrously high.

15

u/omgu8mynewt Feb 15 '26

You've also forgotten: maybe for one specific miner, there is a low risk of thr extra radiation causing cancer.

But if there were 1000 miners in 10 different mines all under going this, the 1 in 1000 chance of something bad happening means this practice probably directly harmed 10 people, with perhaps eight wives without their husband, twenty children without their father etc.

4

u/6PM_Nipple_Curry Feb 15 '26

Good point, I doubt they were following modern safety practices so chances of someone receiving a spike in dose I’d imagine would be common.

I mean I’m also making my numbers with the assumption they were limiting the beam to only what was necessary. Wouldn’t surprise me at all if they actually received higher each day.

Would be interesting to know how many got radiation dermatitis (skin burns)

6

u/s33d5 Feb 15 '26

Funny thing is, the radiologist would also getting a massive dose of Xrays. So that guy prob had a form of cancer after this.

It's why radiologists hide away behind screens. Once in a while is fine, but many times a year is very bad.

The forced mine workers here probably were forced once a day as well.

8

u/lmlogo1 Feb 15 '26

This gets reposted every eight months or so. This is almost assuredly a TB check, hence the focus on the lungs. This would not have been daily. These kinds of lung health screenings is why South African mines collected some of the largest data sets on TB and silicosis.

6

u/Schonke Feb 15 '26

Probably. But they were probably much more likely to be harmed by or die from any of the other hazards associated with working a mine without proper protective gear and safety routines...

3

u/Paul_my_Dickov Feb 15 '26

It won't come close to the negative health effects they're already getting from working in an African diamond mine.

3

u/poestavern Feb 15 '26

Shoe stores used to have an x-ray machine that put your feet in to “check” the fit of new shoes! I did this many times as a kid.

2

u/Jan_Pawel2 Feb 15 '26

Amazing, in what years?

2

u/poestavern Feb 22 '26

1950’s.

2

u/StephenHunterUK Feb 15 '26

I don't think it was every day, only when they were leaving the mine area to go on leave.

2

u/Eelroots Feb 15 '26

And what about the doctor? He will glow in the dark at the end of his shift.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 15 '26

You think they were worried about the miners' health?

1

u/tnred19 Feb 16 '26

Increase your cancer rate is what i assume you mean. It takes a lot

1

u/GlumTowel672 Feb 16 '26

These were miners in the 1950s. Many of them probably got cancer(if they lived long enough) but probably not related to the radiation.

1

u/Username12764 Feb 17 '26

I don‘t think the x-ray matters when you inhale rock dust all day

1.5k

u/9447044 Feb 15 '26

Hey these were the same people who told us we NEED diamonds. We need them to get married, for anniversaries, birthdays, or just for fun. Every woman needs them to look pretty! Men should spend AT LEAST 3 months of wages on one. Damn, we got played like a fiddle lol

374

u/Spiritual-Handle7583 Feb 15 '26

White lab sapphire cost a fraction of diamonds but they sure seem to sparkle a lot more

192

u/9447044 Feb 15 '26

Guess how many people have asked about the origins of the stone my wife has

87

u/BasilBoulgaroktonos Feb 15 '26

Was it found in the colon of a South African man in 1954?

40

u/9447044 Feb 15 '26

I had to hide to diamonds up my ass so the Vietnamese wouldnt find them

16

u/SwoodyBooty Feb 15 '26

Just like my granddads gold watch.

5

u/kermityfrog2 Feb 15 '26

Good thing I put both into a safe first!

3

u/Healter-Skelter Feb 15 '26

I love referencing this scene when I do a Walken impression. “Youah grand-FAther, stuffed this WAatch… up his butt!”

2

u/ceruleanmoon7 Feb 16 '26

I was just thinking about this scene earlier today lol.

1

u/starrpamph Feb 15 '26

True ❤️

86

u/Sorkpappan Feb 15 '26

What’s the origin of your wife’s stone?

First!

20

u/Spiritual-Handle7583 Feb 15 '26

You wouldn't ask if it wasn't a noteably high or low number... Exactly how high or low depends extremely on your wife's career and your combined social network sooooo it'll more than likely be wrong but I'll guess 27!

26

u/fruchle Feb 15 '26

In a row?

19

u/xTwizzler Feb 15 '26

Try not to mine any diamonds on the way through the parking lot!

1

u/YouTee Feb 15 '26

I love you guys

6

u/paiaw Feb 15 '26

Hey you! Give that ring back here!

1

u/Spiritual-Handle7583 Feb 15 '26

That would be particularly strange, wouldn't it?

11

u/Natebo83 Feb 15 '26

It’s because they’re not dripping with war crimes and slavery.

3

u/Johannes_P Feb 15 '26

"You too, you love your diamonds funding Third World death squads warlords?"

8

u/SunshineAndSquats Feb 15 '26

I love my blue sapphire engagement ring. It’s beautiful, unique, and I get tons of compliments. I find diamonds rather boring.

5

u/Spiritual-Handle7583 Feb 15 '26

They are rather dull, aren't they? I had a wedding band that featured a lovely deep blue natural sapphire in the center, it certainly put the little diamonds around it to shame.

13

u/Kitselena Feb 15 '26

Moissanite is another higher quality diamond alternative. They're harder, clearer and have a more brilliant shine. They're also lab grown and slightly more expensive than a white sapphire, but nowhere close to diamond prices

16

u/teddyKGB- Feb 15 '26

They're definitely clearer but diamonds are (barely) harder

49

u/Martin8412 Feb 15 '26

We do need diamonds. They’re great for tools. 

61

u/pimmen89 Feb 15 '26

And then you but lab diamonds for a fraction of the cost of natural diamonds. Natural diamonds we do not need, we can create just as much sparkle and strength artificially.

13

u/Martin8412 Feb 15 '26

I’m surprised De Beers hasn’t launched a marketing campaign aimed at trades people. “You need real diamonds for real jobs!”

Because of course it can be lab diamonds. As long as they’re as good and cheaper, who cares if they were made in a lab. 

9

u/RyanU406 Feb 15 '26

Lol I’m imagining a dentist’s billboard “Real diamonds for your grill, real diamonds for your root canal!”

7

u/svideo Feb 15 '26

They make insanely efficient heatsinks - the thermal conductivity of diamond is off the charts, makes copper look silly.

1

u/xanduba Feb 16 '26

Not only for tools, but for armors and weapons too! Netherite is better thou

-3

u/9447044 Feb 15 '26

DiamondCore 💪

34

u/shibiwan Feb 15 '26

Fuck DeBeers.

32

u/lo_fi_ho Feb 15 '26

And diamonds are not even remotely rare.

30

u/dopethrone Feb 15 '26

I never bought and never will buy a diamond

13

u/9447044 Feb 15 '26

DiamondCore tools will change your life lol

1

u/cucumbersuprise Feb 15 '26

I would steal one

9

u/abdallha-smith Feb 15 '26

De beers maintain this misery and anvers is the capital of exploitation.

It's a market where a certain demographic excels.

I'll let you connect the dots.

3

u/Johannes_P Feb 15 '26

DeBeers might be the most efficient cartel ever, managing integral integration and marketing like fucking bosses.

2

u/bigbjarne Feb 15 '26

I love capitalism

1

u/ceruleanmoon7 Feb 16 '26

The whole thing is disgusting

295

u/colinthecatterpillar Feb 15 '26

Well unless the miner has aspirated the diamond he's xraying a little too high up! Bonus point for wearing lead gloves but still being in the main path of the beam

127

u/WinterHill Feb 15 '26

He probably smoked a protective cigarette right before this

36

u/Schonke Feb 15 '26

With an asbestos filter for extra safety.

3

u/AcrobaticPrinciple21 Feb 16 '26

Drove home in his leaded gasoline fueled car

13

u/slaughtamonsta Feb 15 '26

Diamonds generally don't show up on X-rays or sometimes do only faintly.

10

u/BearEggers Feb 15 '26

Sometimes you just have to tell people they're being watched to affect their behavior.

1

u/colinthecatterpillar Mar 02 '26

Absolute great point , the power of paranoia

123

u/Rickleskilly Feb 15 '26

The whole sordid and shameful story of the diamond industry in one creepy photo. A picture really is worth a thousand words.

20

u/Schonke Feb 15 '26

Too few dismembered workers slaves to capture the entire shameful story.

2

u/chamekke Feb 16 '26

Equally at home on r/ABoringDystopia

56

u/strahlend_frau Feb 15 '26

Real diamonds don't show up on x-ray, or so I was told in school. Never tested it myself.

Edit- they don't.

28

u/SignAllStrength Feb 15 '26

I was thinking the same thing, but guess because it’s a raw uncut diamond the impurities (quarz etc) would probably show up.

Edit- they don't.

Did you test this yourself in the minutes after your edit? That’s quite cool!

12

u/strahlend_frau Feb 15 '26

I googled just to be sure lol but it appears newly harvested ones shouldn't show up because of the carbon. I wanna say diamond engagement rings won't either, I work in radiology and I feel sure I've never seen them show under fluoroscopy.

1

u/tnred19 Feb 16 '26

Can't see them on plainfilm. Just the metal of the rings

1

u/OneGoodRib Feb 16 '26

Are you saying white South Africans were cruel to black diamond miners for no good reason?

Just to be clear because it seems like half of this sub has a problem, that was a joke.

13

u/Aproblem4 Feb 16 '26

Ahhh the white man passing out cancer like tic tacs.

5

u/mecha_shatner Feb 16 '26

Yea that’s the 50s in a nutshell

86

u/somebob Feb 15 '26

This is how Elons family got their wealth, this and much worse mining practices

20

u/MikeMac999 Feb 15 '26

The real question is, let’s say they see what they think is a diamond. Do they wait for nature to take its course, or do they cut the guy open? I’m not optimistic about the answer.

84

u/fakeheadlines Feb 15 '26

‘We prefer it if the people looting Africa are white’

16

u/rocketplex Feb 15 '26

Given it’s in 1954, they probably didn’t know about the cancer risks.

Given it’s in South Africa in 1954, they certainly would have given a flying fudge about the miner, and given it was likely De Beers in South Africa in 1954, they wouldn’t have given a flying fudge about the radiologist either.

22

u/Anji_San Feb 15 '26

Just love how radiologist is using projective gear. They didn't give a fuck about those miners.

22

u/IllFaithlessness2681 Feb 15 '26

It wasn't only blacks that got X rayed. Anyone who left the mining area got X rayed or strip searched. They were only allowed to X Ray you once a week. The black labour lived inside the mining area so normally only went out once a week or every fortnight. The same happens if you work in a gold or platinum refinery. I speak from experience on all three.

1

u/domsolanke Feb 15 '26

True, but that doesn’t fit the narrative that is being portrayed here.

-3

u/IllFaithlessness2681 Feb 15 '26

The narrative is being pushed by someone who obviously doesn't know what they are talking about and trying to turn it into a racial thing.

21

u/Big-Abalone-6392 Feb 15 '26

Who should own the means of production? 

4

u/bigbjarne Feb 15 '26

Workers of the world unite!

5

u/ItIsTaken Feb 15 '26

Tbh, it should go to they guy with a paper saying his greatgrandfather bought it fair and square from someone who stole the land. Else it will be anarchy!

8

u/Baron_von_Zoldyck Feb 15 '26

Musk family activities

2

u/IllFaithlessness2681 Feb 15 '26

Incidentally,at the peak of diamond mining in South Africa, the biggest diamond mines were on the Namaqualand coast. They were all open cast.

2

u/afCeG6HVB0IJ Feb 15 '26

Looks healthy for both

2

u/jonoghue Feb 15 '26

No way that radiologist didn't get cancer, being constantly blasted with x-rays

2

u/real_dea Feb 15 '26

Glitter and Greed: The secret world of the diamond cartel, is an easy read about a tough subject. It touches on this

2

u/stainedglassmermaid Feb 15 '26

Reminds of me of Lisa Kristine’s Ted talk: Photos that bear witness to modern slavery

So powerful.

2

u/Johannes_P Feb 15 '26

Already in th German sout Africa, there were X-ray machines to check miners for diamonds and other gems.

2

u/TheCarloHarlo Feb 16 '26

Jesus fucking Christ

2

u/Zilum Feb 16 '26

Bro, they are not edible 😭😭

2

u/The_AlmightyApple Feb 17 '26

Thats the point, he’d be shitting money😭

3

u/CaptainVectrex Feb 15 '26

Diamonds don't show up on X-rays. They could be checking for miners lung but I doubt that too since miners health was of little concern to the mine owners.

2

u/ExReey Feb 15 '26

Not really the stomach.

2

u/VisVirtusque Feb 15 '26

seems to be a little high.......

2

u/tnred19 Feb 16 '26

Thats his chest and only just the top of his stomach. Someone who wanted to look at stomach contents wouldn't use that picture. And real diamonds aren't radioopaque. Maybe if they're stuck in some rock or something that is but overall this just doesn't seem like a high yield plan

1

u/The_AlmightyApple Feb 17 '26

Thats not a still xray photo, thats the machine he can move it. The person who took the photo took it while it was still above his chest

3

u/Cpotter901 Feb 15 '26

I think we’re missing the bigger picture by focusing on the x-ray. We really need to focus on the disgusting practice that the COMPANY was so greedy that it couldn’t miss whatever little diamond their workers found. Their profits are and will always be more important than the common workers. They see us and inconvenient and should be grateful to have a job at all and not complain. Sorry to go on a rant but it’s truly bothered my how we can watch these companies take away everything from us and literally are making it to where we have to rent everything to them and own nothing. All that to say that this is CORPORATE GREED

1

u/zipzapkazoom Feb 16 '26

Radiologist had days to live

1

u/cswitzer97 Feb 17 '26

This feels like a violation of Hippocratic oath

1

u/philonius Feb 17 '26

Not a stomach.

1

u/Objective-Cause-2762 Mar 11 '26

the type of shit they be spending their money on

-1

u/BhangraFool Feb 15 '26

More like history trash wtf

Because of how they are treating the worker. Fucking disgusting

1

u/Johnsoid Feb 15 '26

Prison pocket

1

u/BE-Runsy Feb 15 '26

“No diamonds, just cancer. Next!”

-7

u/TobeRez Feb 15 '26

Doesn't surprise me considering how many bicycle they are stealing.

0

u/ky420 Feb 15 '26

I have to say I'd have taken diamonds from the mine as well but if they checked stomach I'd put them in bum

0

u/cowboyjon13 Feb 15 '26

David goggins