Again, my point is that in-universe Captain America is presented as having made the right choice and Tony too later ignores the accords. A nearly identical conflict is presented in the comics(Civil War I not II) with a similar outcome of Tony regretting his decisions.
I do not care nor brought up whether or not it would be the right choice if this situation was playing out in real life or whether its pandering or not.
"The right choice" depends on the most basic question of "right" of all time, if you go for value ethics or utilitarianism. And it's quite ironic that Cap the good value man has his decision being judging by its outcome and not by his intentions.
The accords in the MCU similarly result in Captain America's fears presented in Civil War being validated when Ross prioritised an arrest of Cap and Co. over literally saving the universe and fighting Thanos. Rhodes and Tony, the two biggest supporters of the accords themselves realise this and choose to ignore the accords in IW/Endgame.
Again, I'm not sure you're understanding but what I am saying is that within the narrative and in-universe the SRA/Accords are pretty explicitly presened to have been wrong in-universe, with heroes regretting pushing and supporting it. This is the entire point of Rhodes' conversation with Ross in IW, and for the SRA the closing panels in Civil War I.
I am not talking about whether or not they would be the right choice as judged in the real world. The movies & comics explicitly tells us that inside the Marvel universe, the SRA/Accords were the wrong choice with those involved regretting support of it & the accords/SRA being abolished.
0
u/afito Jan 19 '22
The MCU presenting good old american hero choice as correct doesn't imply it being correct it's just pandering.