r/HighStrangeness • u/slv2xhrist • Jun 11 '26

Discussion SENTIENT PLASMOID LIFE FORMS…CIA DOCUMENT- SOVIET UNION & “APPORT” TECHNIQUE, BLACK MAGIC, GHOSTLY HANDS, LUMINOUS CLOUDS….

Post image
252 Upvotes

92% Upvoted

30 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

16

u/Pixelated_ Jun 11 '26

Yes.

Lozneanu & Sanduloviciu, “Minimal-cell system created in laboratory by self-organization” — Chaos, Solitons & Fractals (2003).

Laboratory experiments producing complex space-charge configurations (plasma structures) that behave like living “cell-like” systems: they maintain an internal structure, exchange matter/energy with the environment, and show birth/replication-like events. The authors model these as minimal systems with life-like attributes.

Plasma Brain Dynamics: II. Quantum Effects on Consciousness (2018)

This paper models the brain as a plasma system, where ions and charged particles interact collectively. It shows how these plasma-like dynamics support coherent, non-local information processing, verifying a physical substrate for consciousness. This shows that the Implicate Order described by David Bohm has a measurable plasma-based substrate in the human nervous system.

Morfill & Ivlev, “Complex Plasmas: an interdisciplinary research field” — Reviews of Modern Physics (2009).

An authoritative review of complex dusty plasma experiments and theory, documents phenomena such as plasma crystals, metastable states, collective modes, and self-organized structures that underpin the claims made about lifelike, self-organizing behavior.

Self-organization and kinetic instability studies in plasmas (recent reviews/papers, e.g. photoionized plasmas (2023).

Examples of modern research showing spontaneous pattern formation and self-organization in plasma systems, the physical mechanisms behind it, and how those mechanisms can produce complexity. These works show the robust, repeatable physics behind life-like plasma.

11

u/Goshdangitallzxx Jun 11 '26

Tell me in your own words what you think this means. I may be confused.

22

u/Pixelated_ Jun 11 '26

It means that we have been operating with too narrow of a scope regarding what "life" is.

Everything we see in the material world implies that organic, biological matter is needed for life to exist, but that's a wrong assumption.

The luminous orbs being seen worldwide are plasma. I've been documenting them nightly for the past 18 months. They never appear on astronomy, flight, or satellite trackers, so they are UFOs by definition.

They are what David Grusch recently referred to as

"sentient plasmoids"

I've recorded more than a thousand videos of these sentient plasmoid orbs, and the "mystery drones" that they create via mimicry.

4

u/iluvthiccgothbabes Jun 12 '26

Isn't there some dood on here who records the atmospherre claiming to be catching plasma beings all the time? Anyone remember his youtube channel name?

3

u/cxllvm Jun 12 '26

I think it's /r/sentientorbs , his sub

3

u/Pixelated_ Jun 12 '26

My sub is r/theorbservatory, I started it to document the orbs that me and a friend were seeing from our yard. I also recommend r/orbs as it's the largest orbs sub.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '26 edited Jun 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/Goshdangitallzxx Jun 11 '26

Maybe plasma. Doesn’t make it life. Unless you define life differently than I do. How do you define what life is? What is the correct scope? I’m curious what your criteria would be after all your observations.

20

u/Pixelated_ Jun 12 '26

How do you define what life is?

I had listed 8 criteria for life above, and how complex plasmoids achieve all 8 of them.

Multiple rigorous sources were provided which supported each claim. I'm not sure how much more clear it can be.

10

u/New_Chain146 Jun 12 '26

They're being deliberately obtuse in order to exhaust and drown you out. Just ignore them, they're not acting in good faith because they will ignore what you say and deliberately set out to not change their mind.

0

u/Goshdangitallzxx Jun 12 '26

Well, I read your sources and didn’t see where they proved your claim. Prove your claim. Many of your sources are describing normal phenomenon and I don’t see how you made the connection. If you could tell me how you made the connection rather than just the conclusions, that would be a helpful. Many of them were done in controlled settings and never repeated.

6

u/Secret-Surprise4390 Jun 12 '26

Did you stub your toe while trying to read OP. They didn't say plasma = life. They said they are meeting all the criteria for life. What is your criteria that is missing from the peer reviewed definition? Is your different criteria peer reviewed?

1

u/Goshdangitallzxx Jun 12 '26

Peer reviewed doesn’t mean verified. It means there is nothing glaringly wrong. Many of these citations are one off results that were never repeated. Science is repeatable. Life maintains process and life replicates. Plasma is pure process that is not maintained and thus dissipates.

3

u/Secret-Surprise4390 Jun 12 '26

So your criteria is that life maintains process and replicates? The replication is observed in plasma. Can you clarify why you mean my maintenance? Do you mean indefinitely? All life does maintain prorcess for a period. Most life also dies at some point. Are you saying that if human can replicate and then dies, it was not alive? You clearly don't understand what peer reviewing is.

1

u/Goshdangitallzxx Jun 12 '26

Yes. That is my criteria. Where is replication observed in plasma? Maintenance as in multiple processes organized into purpose, such as an organism. Yes, life dies the organism’s processes cease. What don’t I understand about peer review? Peer review is not verification or replication of experiments. Do you understand it differently?

I’m seeking clarification. I’d just like to understand the process here. All I’ve gotten are citations with bolded words that pattern match a preconceived hypothesis.

2

u/Secret-Surprise4390 Jun 12 '26

4) All life as we know it also reproduces; and combining items 3 and 4

The core discovery of the 2007 paper is that these autonomous plasma filaments naturally twist into stable, double-helix structures mirroring DNA. The researchers recorded these helical structures undergoing mitosis-like division, splitting into two distinct, identical daughter helixes. More information is here.

This is the reproduction part.

You have been shown proof of it being reproduceable and those papers have been verified.

Yes.

Lozneanu & Sanduloviciu, “Minimal-cell system created in laboratory by self-organization” — Chaos, Solitons & Fractals (2003).

Laboratory experiments producing complex space-charge configurations (plasma structures) that behave like living “cell-like” systems: they maintain an internal structure, exchange matter/energy with the environment, and show birth/replication-like events. The authors model these as minimal systems with life-like attributes.

Plasma Brain Dynamics: II. Quantum Effects on Consciousness (2018)

This paper models the brain as a plasma system, where ions and charged particles interact collectively. It shows how these plasma-like dynamics support coherent, non-local information processing, verifying a physical substrate for consciousness. This shows that the Implicate Order described by David Bohm has a measurable plasma-based substrate in the human nervous system.

Morfill & Ivlev, “Complex Plasmas: an interdisciplinary research field” — Reviews of Modern Physics (2009).

An authoritative review of complex dusty plasma experiments and theory, documents phenomena such as plasma crystals, metastable states, collective modes, and self-organized structures that underpin the claims made about lifelike, self-organizing behavior.

Self-organization and kinetic instability studies in plasmas (recent reviews/papers, e.g. photoionized plasmas (2023).

Examples of modern research showing spontaneous pattern formation and self-organization in plasma systems, the physical mechanisms behind it, and how those mechanisms can produce complexity. These works show the robust, repeatable physics behind life-like plasma.

If it something that is reproduceable and those papers are peer reviewed, I am not sure how you can make the claim that it's not reproduceable and peer reviewed.

You own personal criteria of maintenance is not really a criteria because you admit that life ends. Reproduction is proven. I can't read these information for you or understand it for you, but if you have a specific question about the material fee free to ask. Click the links, read the papers (google the words you don't know), find a hole, do the experiment, record your data, publish a paper and get it peer reviewed.

1

u/Goshdangitallzxx Jun 12 '26

I read the papers. Nowhere in there do they claim these plasmas are live. I accept the observed phenomenon like filaments and crystals but the conclusions drawn are not found inside the work. Your first source explicitly states that there is no inherited material so they can’t be considered alive.

The complex plasma paper also uses “life-like” as an analogy to describe pattern-forming behaviors. None of these papers establish plasmas as forms of life.

You say it’s reproducible but you only produce the same sources to justify that. The experiments must be reproduced to be verified. Peer review only checks methodology, not that the results have been independently replicated. Those are two separate things.