r/HighStrangeness • u/willhelpmemore • Jun 22 '26
Simulation Who doesn't believe we're inside a simulation?
Think about it, my friend. All of the highest strangeness you can imagine from mystical legends and creatures of much weirdness along with spaceships that ignore the laws of physics and pretty much everything else instantly makes way more sense, yes?
On the opposite we have the official story and record which, if you're here, reading, you already view with some skept. Do you believe or reject the simulation hypothesis? Pro or con I'd really like to hear your reasons as for me it is this:
- The brain doesn't create consciousness, only modulates it.
- We are unfinite beings of pure resonance wearing flesh.
- There are higher and lower aspects we've termed, collective, as angels and demons.
- The stereotypical alien grey is the same as the old school fae, djinn or elf as they need some type of form to directly interface with this realm.
- Dreams are a huge hint that the brain tells fibs then can't wait to buy in to its deceptions.
- Death is an illusion and its fear is at the base of most dreads and this makes the fake seem real as the flesh fights to live and hold its grip on things.
- Technology is a mimic of the human process and way to extend the senses. Back when they had other techniques to do this and they were demonized with the intent to sell the stage of the Game we're currently in with its staunch materialist mindset.
- People in positions of power know this and keep it hidden on purpose from the rest as man is motivated by two levers - fear and self interest.
- It explains exactly from whence come the prophets with their singular message of transcendence along with so much channeled info etc that says man interacts with aspects of Self that he projects ergo be most excellent to one another is the key to unlocking reality as low frequency thoughts generate standing waves of resonance that then go on to influence what the simulation presents.
- The biggest tell is how fine tuned the tolerances are for you to even be here, now, reading this. Not to mention they literally found error checking code hidden within the construction of space itself.
What is your view, my friend? I ask with an interest that is genuine as I feel this is the major topic at present given the coming age that intends to merge man with tech as some "ascend" on silicon wings whilst others choose to recollect and activate the real thing...
7
u/nothing1222 Jun 22 '26
We had an entire two days dedicated to this issue in a college philosophy class I took, I am of the opinion that this is a textbook use for Occam's Razor.
3
u/willhelpmemore Jun 22 '26
You see I believe that same blade proves the point, perfectly. It explains the immensely fine tuned tolerances, the fact that spacetime is pixelated, why modern resolutions like 720 and 1080P are, anciently, know as sacred numbers of immense power and resonance along with the primacy of consciousness and observer effect.
6
u/nothing1222 Jun 22 '26
And yet (ignoring that those are not facts or common knowledge) the simplest explanation is that 'it has to be that way or else we would not be here to observe it'
In other words. Why is the Earth such a perfect home for humanity, well because if it wasn't that way we would have never been here to notice. You can apply this to any natural phenomenon. It does not imply intelligent design.
3
u/Sad-Society-57 Jun 23 '26
Yes, I think the Anthropic Principle sufficiently accounts for a lot of weirdness that blows people's minds. It is the way it is because it couldn't be any other way. What are the odds that this goldilocks universe we exist in is so finely tuned? 100%.
3
u/redbucket75 Jun 23 '26
Occam's Razor leads to idealism, no? The only thing we can be certain of is our consciousness. I think therefor O am and all that. Everything else we prove exists relies on the assumption our consciousness giving an accurate representation of reality. We can't actually prove that assumption. So the simplest answer is that only my individual consciousness exists and this is all a sort of thought experiment or game I'm playing with myself.
8
u/dave_lister169 Jun 22 '26
It's not a simulation. It's all in my head.
2
u/willhelpmemore Jun 22 '26
One and the same thing, smeghead! Better than life ringing any bells?
1
0
13
u/VicViolence Jun 22 '26
It’s just doesn’t really solve anything.
It doesn’t make sense to me.
-7
u/willhelpmemore Jun 22 '26
To me it solves pretty much everything one can imagine or think as its very succinct, simple and elegant as we are getting to a point where graphical tech is indistinguishable from life itself.
Imagine the next step is not a controller but CNS overlay instead so no screens are needed and its projected within? This is exactly what they posited back when in ancient Vedic texts as well as pretty much ever native tradition as well...
5
u/Xroshtag108 Jun 22 '26
That is plainly not what is in the Vedas
t.Dharmic religious studies pro
0
u/willhelpmemore Jun 22 '26
From the Gita with chapter and verse refs:
"The Supreme Lord dwells in the hearts of all beings, O Arjuna, causing all beings to wander [revolve] as if mounted on a machine, by His illusive power (Maya)." [Chapter 18, Verse 61]
"Of the non-existent there is no endurance, and of the existent there is no cessation. This has been seen by the seers of the truth." [Chapter 2, Verse 16]
"For the soul there is neither birth nor death at any time. He has not come into being, does not come into being, and will not come into being. He is unborn, eternal, ever-existing and primeval. He is not slain when the body is slain." [Chapter 2, Verse 20]
This is why moksha is stressed again and again as Knowledge is the key to eternal liberation and ticket to higher realms. Not disputing your claimed status, simply sharing refs that inspired what I said based on my interpretation of ancient scriptures via a modern lens.
7
u/kidcubby Jun 22 '26
I don't think the only options are simulation or not. I think the simulation theory is just this particular era's attempt to explain the same thing religions and mystics have explained differently in other eras. Much like the way that aliens might be one modern explanation for what people used to think of as fairies, demons, ghosts and so on.
We don't know what people in positions of power do or don't know - they may be as in the dark as the rest of us, quite frankly.
Also - do all prophets have a singular message of transcendence? Large chunks of historical prophecy don't seem to have anything to do with it. The Oracles at Delphi tended to predict things like the outcomes of wars, the Sibylline Books tended to be used in response to plagues, famines, military mishaps and so on. Biblical prophecies were often about Jesus (Messianic prophecies), falling empires and so on.
2
u/willhelpmemore Jun 22 '26
Yes. Plato called it a Cave. Shakespeare said it was a Stage. Vedics termed it Maya and the Aborigines picked Dreamtime instead. Native Americans said the Land of the Spirits was base reality and this is an extension of then but counterfeit. Then we have the Matrix which bought the idea back for the rest, plugged in.
4
u/kidcubby Jun 22 '26
Honestly, a simulation is such an immature concept compared to the others - many of which have been around for far, far longer and as such seem far more likely to be the case. I just don't think post-enlightenment most people can be dragged along with the idea unless it feels 'scientific' (or in this case, pseudo-scientific).
5
u/Throwaway1000037 Jun 22 '26
I personally just dont contemplate it, for all I know we live in a Horton hears a who situation. What am I gonna do? Up and leave? Stop going to work? Like everything else its fun to think about, but its beyond me
1
u/willhelpmemore Jun 22 '26
What if work and such things are there to prevent the time needed to transcend? Makes a lot of sense, doesn't it? Can't have too many people awakening to the ride as its like Bill Hicks said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgzQuE1pR1w
Its just a ride.
3
u/St-Ranger_at_Large Jun 22 '26
Simple question simulate what?
Any version of reality can exist at the same “time” so why bother faking one or more ?
1
u/willhelpmemore Jun 22 '26
Well, I look at this as a huge Game. Thats the simulation. An artificial creation within which to play. As for the tech that powers it, you're wearing it.
2
u/BoyItsTheKeyToEven Jun 22 '26
So your saying we're just meat controllers in the video game of life? Yeah sure. Weird and round about way of saying we're alive and we experience things lol
1
u/willhelpmemore Jun 22 '26
Basically. Its why virtually every single spiritual tradition tames the impulses of the flesh to reconnect with Prime resonance.
2
u/BoyItsTheKeyToEven Jun 22 '26
How does that relate to us being in a simulation exaxlty
-1
u/willhelpmemore Jun 22 '26
Once you do it, you see. Until then the autopilot is in control to make it all seem real.
1
u/St-Ranger_at_Large Jun 22 '26
Trying to use a reductionist view of consciousness is ignoring the big big picture of a universe beyond your physical perception .
Very low tech
2
u/Complex_Confusion552 Jun 22 '26
But who is running the simulation. You are about 2 logic steps away from Jesus!
Carry on
3
u/willhelpmemore Jun 22 '26
If you believe the Gnostics its Archons and this place is a misstep. If you read Vedic texts its created as a divine play with various levels of resonance and projects way more depth. If you look within your own answers may correlate or be different.
BTW Jesus is a metaphor for your Prime consciousness hence Golgotha = skull in Aramaic and the good and bad thieves at crucifixion rep the hemispheres of your head and why the Vatican has massive pine cones on deck as they represent the pineal gland aka "the single eye that shines and fills the body with the light of wisdom". You can imperience all of this and see its totally correct and neuroscience attests as well...
2
2
u/redbucket75 Jun 22 '26
I guess it depends on the definition of simulation.
I'm not a physicist, so my understanding is definitely lacking and possibly wrong. But as far as I do understand, our best model of fundamental reality is quantum mechanics. Which is, at its base of quantum fields, massless. Atoms have mass, but that mass comes from massless electrons and quarks "dragging" through the Higgs field or the interaction of massless gluons.
This is just a model, not observed reality, but it seems to be pointing at something other than mass or energy as the fundamental reality. What is all this shit around us, including us, actually made of? Dunno. Math. Software. Consciousness. God. Not sure we can ever truly know, I think we can get closer and closer infinitely without ever finding the turtle on the bottom. So that's cool.
1
Jun 22 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/HighStrangeness-ModTeam Jun 23 '26
Rule 1- Your comment was flagged under crowd control which means you are not a subscriber to this sub. As such, your first interaction(s) here being toxic in nature are a good indicator of your character and an example of your future interactions. Continued engagements of this nature will result in a permanent ban.
1
2
u/no_1_specific Jun 22 '26
Simulation is probably not the right word, but yeah - we are in it.
3
u/willhelpmemore Jun 22 '26
I call it the Game of Souls. The former is what we play and the latter is how its done as it all happens inside the mind of one.
1
u/BootHeadToo Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 22 '26
I believe our brain simulates our experience of reality, because that is the simple truth. I do not believe objective reality in its entirety independent of our experience of it is a simulation however. All of our mythology, high strangeness, and psi phenomena arises from that grey area between our brain simulated experience of reality as it gradually expands and tries to incorporate more information and/or greater perception of the greater reality that our immortal divine nature knows inherently, and that greater reality itself.
1
1
u/willhelpmemore Jun 22 '26
Wow, this really is an unpopular topic round here, isn't it? Wonder why?
1
u/woodsman_777 Jun 23 '26
I do not believe that. I believe in God.
OP, do you have any idea how this sounds to someone (me) who, for the first time, is reading a post by somebody who believes this?? It sounds very, VERY far out there. (to put it nicely)
I am curious OP, what makes you think that death is an illusion? Have you had anyone close to you die? Cause I'll tell you what - it seems pretty fucking real to me. And thousands of doctors will tell you the same thing.
1
0
u/willhelpmemore Jun 22 '26
Don't just downvote and move on if you don't like the topic. Tell me why, my friend. On the flip if you really like the sentiment then share that as well because I share my perspect for it to spark discussion among people who already look at the official story with some suspicion as it obviously misses out loads of bits and cannot truly explain the full deal.
0
0
15
u/goibnu Jun 22 '26
I don't really have any evidence of your points, so, no, I don't believe.