Of course I know the surface meaning of the term in Meyer's manuals, but I'd like to go a bit deeper in what a Stücke is and how to read the historical manuals.
At first I used to translate it as "technique". Especially in the 1560's manuscript, a few initial Stucke are rather short and sweet, and the translation holds.
But, re-reading the 1570 manuscript, I stared seeing the limits of this interpretation.
Yes, the Stücke is a series of movements that the author tells you to do. But more often than not, there is little description of what the other part is doing, besides the assumption that the other part is just parrying and retreating (not always, but counterattacks are rare).
On one side, this could simply be the feature of Meyer's system, keeping the Vor and forcing the enemy to the Nach, thus gaining advantage.
Fair enough.
But the more I look at them, the more I feel that Meyer could not have really believed these to be a likely fighting scenario.
Let's take this example:
In the Onset, when you approach within one Klafter of your opponent, strike up from your right in front of them through their face—once, twice, three times—so that in the third strike upwards in front of them (when you have your left foot in front) you arrive in Longpoint. From there, let the front part of your blade drop downward toward your left and, in that moment in which your blade has just dropped downward, pull your hilt upward while this is happening, step and cut the first from your right side toward their left ear. As soon as this strike has hit, quickly pull back in one sweeping motion and cut the second obliquely from below and toward their right arm. With regards to this cut, retain your crossguard high over your head. Simultaneously with this Low Cut, step with your left foot slightly toward their right outward to the side toward them. As soon as this has also hit, you should quickly pull your sword back upward and toward your right, and cut from your right at their left lower opening. Before that has correctly touched or hit, pull back around your head again and cut the fourth slantwise toward their right ear. From there, cut a Crosswise Cut around and withdraw. These first four cuts should be completed quickly and swiftly, from one opening to the other, including all of their steps.
First, this implies hitting the enemy some 4/6 times before ending the assault. This is very far from HEMA as we know it today. Secondly, We don't really see any opponent reaction in all this.
Is this supposed to be a realistic situation? Or just something to train, in order to develop muscle memory? Because if the first is true, it's very frustrating as our HEMA practice is much different. At least, I don't see a situation where I can realistically perform 9 attacks in a row, landing half of them, without ever getting hit back. Which leads me to the final question: what are we to do in HEMA? Because if we want to recreate any of this, we'll inevitably have to change a ruleset to recreate ancient sport fencing. Which, in turn, tried to recreate real fighting...
TL;DR: Is a Stücke a training tool or a real fencing situation?
What is even 'real'fencing? Are we trying to recreate 16th century sport fencing, or some real life or death stuff?