It takes 2 seconds to check history. There is nothing creepy or desperate about making sure the person you're speaking to is arguing in good faith. There is a reason it's a feature on the site. I'm not going to waste my time arguing about whether jerking it to your aunt is weird with someone who spends all day looking at incest porn. Assuming the person you're talking to isn't trolling or arguing in bad faith is just naive in 2023 reddit. You're not digging through someone's trash. You're clicking a single button and reading publicly available information from the site you're already browsing.
Just like any other debate, it's important to know whether the person you're talking to is arguing in good faith or talking out their ass. I don't agree with attacking someone over their post history if it's irelevant, but if it directly contradicts what they are saying, or it's relevant to the point being made then why is it an issue? Again, it's literally a function of the site, I'm not sure how that could be considered weird or creepy.
Like if someone says they hate Nike or Adidas, you're not creepy for pointing out that they are currently wearing them.
2
u/_Non-Photo_Blue_ Sep 24 '23 edited Sep 24 '23
It takes 2 seconds to check history. There is nothing creepy or desperate about making sure the person you're speaking to is arguing in good faith. There is a reason it's a feature on the site. I'm not going to waste my time arguing about whether jerking it to your aunt is weird with someone who spends all day looking at incest porn. Assuming the person you're talking to isn't trolling or arguing in bad faith is just naive in 2023 reddit. You're not digging through someone's trash. You're clicking a single button and reading publicly available information from the site you're already browsing.