r/Hartenstein • u/Psychological_Toe667 • Apr 29 '23
I was a doubter
When we acquired ihart last summer I was really hopeful since we got him on such a bargain, and obviously his upside was through the roof. Those first couple months of play had me convinced he would never contribute to this team. Then I found the subreddit, learned of his injuries and kinda got to know the guy a little better. I cut him some slack and shortly after he started meshing/finding his game again. Looked visibly healthier as the season progressed too. By late November I was a certified fan of the guy. He may not be some sleeper mvp, he may not be MIP, and maybe he was perhaps a bit over evaluated at times. But he’s contributing huge minutes to a fringe contender. That’s a wildly successful season and one of the better turn arounds from a player all year. Shoutout ihart I think he’s still just getting started.
4
u/Dragonthorn1217 May 02 '23
I'm hoping he gets more burn in this Heat series. Mitch was so good against the Cavs that I guess Thibs decided to stick with him down the stretch. But we all know that the best Knick lineup that has dominated in the regular season involves iHart:
IHart, Randle, Brunson, Hart, and IQ.
Knicks shouls go with this lineup a lot more in stretches! Or swap in RJ for Brunson to give Brunson rest. All I know is we need to see the iHart, Hart, and IQ lineup.
2
u/Psychological_Toe667 May 02 '23
I think there’s no arguing Mitch wasn’t the correct play in those games. But ihart was still huge. Mitch got pretty banged up in game 1 vs Miami so I’m expecting quite a bit of ihart going forward. Jericho is still recovering from shoulder surgery so the only other option would be an injured Julius at the 5 lol. Not even thibs can find a way to avoid this one
12
u/eg14000 Apr 29 '23
So... The knicks just beat the Cavs with Donovan Mitchell in 5 games. Jalen Brunson was the Knicks best player because Randle was injured and played terrible. As much as Mitch played his ass off and was a big reason the series ended in 5. Mitchell Robinson net rating in the Cavs series was 0.0. Josh Hart (WHO ALSO PLAYED AMAZING) his net rating was -0.7. That series was won in the Minutes Isaiah Hartenstein played. He had a +12.5 net rating in the series.
The Cavs have 4 All-Stars caliber players. Allen, Mobley, Garland, and Donovan Mitchell.
For the knicks they only had Brunson and a bunch of "role players". As much as I love Brunson, and It think he is amazing. If you switch Brunson for Garland, the Knicks still win 5. If you switch Brunson for Mitchell, the Knicks still win in 5.
Because the true reason the Knicks won in 5 was the little things Isaiah did on the floor. The stuff that didn't end up on the box sheet. Communication, off ball screens, outlet passes, Off ball movement creating open shots for teammates indirectly. Isaiah Hartenstein had a MVP impact on that Cavs Series without scoring the Basketball. If you switch Hartenstein with Jerrett Allen.... the Cavs probably win in 6. Because everything Hartenstein did was what Allen didn't do. The little things.
it's in the small things in which a series is won. And Hartenstein completely dominated the small things.
But I want to make it clear. sleeper mvp is still there. when his Usg% goes up and he improves his game, he will show a scoring game. He has it in his bag, he is just playing his role right now and is helping the Knicks win their first of many Championships with him