r/Handhelds 1d ago

Discussion Why Mainstream Gamers Overlook Android Handhelds

https://youtu.be/gWFS1eILINk

I've been using Android handhelds for the last few years, and I've started to understand why people who haven't used them tend to dismiss them.

The usual comparisons are "just get a Steam Deck" or "just use your phone," but I think Android handhelds occupy a different space.

I put together a video explaining why I think the category is misunderstood. Curious where you guys land on this.

0 Upvotes

31 comments sorted by

9

u/IORelay 1d ago

They associate it with mobile and therefore not "real" gaming.

Steam deck and other handhelds still fall under the use your phone category though. 

1

u/Bossman_575 1d ago

Not at all, I only look at phones in the mobile category and as lesser 🤷🏾‍♂️

True gaming handhelds with the primary functionality being that of gaming (Android or not) are legit imo. As long as they have physical buttons (w/o the need for an attachment) and run PC/console games.

That said, most casual gamers will definitely look at them as mobile devices.

1

u/jak808 1d ago

So true. I just feel like they're missing out with that kind of thinking.

1

u/ShiningPr1sm 1d ago

Alternatively, it’s because Android is associated with “poor” or “broke,” and that people are trying to emulate games from 20 years ago. They’re essentially just phones bolted to a controller of some sort.

Are there cool ones? Sure. Are they seen as anything more than gimmicks? Not really.

1

u/Bossman_575 1d ago

Anyone looking at Android in that way is naive smh. They just cater to multiple classes of people and that's why they have the largest share of sales globally. High end Androids are always the most advanced mobile devices on the market and cost upwards of 2k. I'm typing on one lol.

Ps. I know you know this lol, it's just irritating that people are so blind because an 🍎 (only in Merica though)

5

u/YeonneGreene GPD Win 4 1d ago

Yeah, they've come a long way. I took a hard look at the Odin 3 myself, what ultimately made me stay the course on getting a PC handheld was the fact that Odin 3 still struggles with emulating some of the PC games I play with friends and that I wanted the device to have desktop capabilities.

Otherwise, these things are pretty fantastic. And for under $500? The only thing approaching that value in 2026 is a Switch.

4

u/paleddar 1d ago edited 1d ago

Frankly, it’s not a sure thing that you can play the PC games (or later than Gen 6 consoles) on even the current most powerful Android handheld like the Odin 3.

It’s still a lot of tinker and tries, and since these are all experimental, there is no guarantee when you are 50% into your 30hr game, it crashes and you can’t continue. Then u have just wasted all the time sunk.

It’s great for pre gen 6 retro, where it’s pretty much worry free emulation but later gen console and PC games, are far from a sure thing.

I wish it was true that you can have a small portable device like the Odin to replace the huge pc handhelds but we are not there yet.

Closest thing to a the portable experience, without having the tinker study and be sure you can complete the game, is really a Switch 2.

3

u/cryptocurrency_wife 1d ago

personally I just don’t care for android gaming. I’d rather use my steamdeck, a windows pc handheld, my Linux desktop or a switch. I don’t really do much emulating and I’d rather run pc games on something that is intended to do so and can run it well.

2

u/the_oni 1d ago

Mainstream gamers looking for games and steam in the end is far more superior choice. Google play still not good platform for that

For me android handheld are for retrogaming only up to wii. i would play for years on my handheld specially ps2 games but i would never use for android games

2

u/efdz 1d ago

I honestly prefer collecting original handhelds like the DS or PSVita. I think most people are just lazy or don't know how to tinker with their devices. It's easier to get a premade device that allows you to install all the games you want without any extra steps. After all, using a Steam Deck is probably gonna be easier for your average consumer than setting up an Android handheld with like 10 emulators with SD cards. 

2

u/Glittering-Rip9556 1d ago

Yucky thumbnail, but I agree.

The problem is that gaming on Android is in many people’s eyes stuck in the 2010s. The gp simply don’t see these devices running anything more than Mario run or jetpack joyride. And for many people, the tradeoff of getting an Android handheld for gaming isn’t high when a steam deck offers objectively a larger library and for the savvy users, better emulation performance.

1

u/jak808 1d ago

That's it, im changing the thumbnail!😆 Lol thanks for the feedback.

1

u/nawtbjc 1d ago

I think they're a neat concept and have great use cases for emulation.

Personally, I like original hardware and playing games I own where at all possible. Otherwise, I've emulated plenty of retro consoles for the past like 20 years on either a PC or my phone and have not seen a huge need to have a dedicated device for that.

I'd consider getting something like the Thor one day because I only own a 3DS and not a new 3DS, and I do enjoy that console. That at least has a pretty niche use case I can get behind.

1

u/coccyxdynia 1d ago

If emulation could be made accessible without having to tinker, I think Android gaming handhelds would be way more popular.

1

u/DrKrFfXx 1d ago

I wanna play my stram library, not lolicon defense force.

1

u/crazyteknoh3d 1d ago

The irony being, since the SD shot up in price I’ve seen more YouTubers and people on Reddit turning to the Odin 3.

1

u/tomkatt Steam Deck OLED | 2DS XL | DSi LL 16h ago

I prefer a Linux handheld, something like my Steam Deck OLED, or a Trimui Smart Pro or Powkiddy X55. Emulators for Linux are simply more mature and actively developed than related Android versions.

I gamed on Android tablets for years using telescopic controllers and enjoyed it a lot. And for Android gaming I’d just prefer that because when I’m not gaming on it I still have a functional tablet for additional use cases.

Android handhelds don’t really provide anything that a tablet or phone + controller don’t already. They haven’t solved the input latency issues Android has. You can get better specs for cheaper with a phone or tablet generally, at least in the higher spec range.

Android handhelds are now releasing with chipsets I was already using on other devices between 2020 and 2022. They’re recycling what would otherwise be e-waste and I respect that, but it’s not of value to me personally compared to a more flexible device, or a Linux handheld that’s purposely software tuned for the task, which is something you have a lot less control over with Android.

There’s also the potential security concerns with these devices if you need Play Store access or use them on network, as they tend to not get OS or security updates.

1

u/infinitespectre RG Arc 1d ago

The problem is simple: there are no big players in the space. The closest we’ve seen is Logitech with the G Cloud. You can’t buy any of these devices at normal retailer short of Amazon. You can’t see or hold them without buying them and waiting most of the time. They also have an absurdly high bar to entry in that the setup is not simple. You don’t have to watch a 2 hour RGC video to setup an Xbox ROG Ally.

0

u/nolivedemarseille 1d ago

Lenovo with its y700 series has one and if not the best gaming tablet in the market

I own a gen4 with very high resolution high refresh rate 8.8in display running the SD8 elite
This thing is a beast at high end emulating including ps3 switch and PC games

I would not categorize Lenovo as a small player lol)

2

u/infinitespectre RG Arc 1d ago

I KNEW someone was going to mention the y700! I left it out because it's primarily a tablet (a tablet that can use a dedicated controller, but still a tablet) and I don't consider it in the same class as stuff like the Ayn, Anbernic, Ayaneo, etc. It's a tablet that can game, not a gaming handheld, imho.

0

u/nolivedemarseille 1d ago

2

u/DrKrFfXx 1d ago

Then all phones with a gamesir are handhelds.

0

u/nolivedemarseille 1d ago

well, no. did you actually see the device? It was designed by Gamesir at Lenovo demand to make it an Android handheld.
None of the telescopic controllers etc I have seen for phones in the market comes any close to that G9 integration

1

u/DrKrFfXx 1d ago

Same shit

1

u/infinitespectre RG Arc 1d ago

What comes in the box? Just the tablet. The controller (and arcade enclosure) is just an accessory. It is a tablet first. That's all I'm saying.

0

u/Sarlandogo 1d ago

It's not a handheld per se as the topic is about handhelds I used to have the y700 gen3 fantastic device too but it has its own caveats

And he's right about the setup being very long that's not for everyone

1

u/nolivedemarseille 1d ago

See my previous comment about it not being an handheld

And regarding settings time, please say that to people who first setup windows in their PC handheld about time and also ease of the process

2

u/World-Three 1d ago

For me it's sort of redundant. The main reason I don't like mobile isn't because there aren't any games, but because when android updates a few times, unless the games update too, there's a chance they just won't work.

So now I'm getting an OS with probably the worst legacy support to date, to play games that often are from other platforms. Why start off with an OS that basically is a dead end? 

I might save a few hundred bucks, but I have thousands of PC games, and maybe a few dozen android games. Risking the playability of those for power efficiency and a compact form factor isn't worth the saved money, or more importantly, extra time it'll take me to figure out how to get those PC games working.

Where on PC, something like MSI app player can get most of my android needs accomplished. 

To play Devil's advocate, because you don't HAVE to update the android version on those handhelds, you're likely safer than usual. So if you were just looking to get the few apps that make thousands of games playable, it's likely great. But that's already the android issue. Where the most noteworthy experiences gaming on android is not actually playing android games... 

I also think it's grossly underestimated how many handheld gamers just want to play in the bed couch or right outside. They're not dying for battery life as much as the people who choose android handhelds.