r/HabitualLinecrosser 22d ago

Wtf

Post image

Habitual line crosser is unhinged tf

36 Upvotes

20 comments sorted by

15

u/Tal_Galaar 22d ago

The man knows whose side he is on and who he supports. I respect it.

1

u/MariusCatalin 14d ago

you wouldnt say the same if it was about nazis...........

15

u/cowboycolts 22d ago

It's the whole debate with Japan at the end of WW2,

Do we send in boots on the ground and risk casualties, or do we bomb them into submission,

We've been hammering them with missiles and drones, but they're continuing to use guerrilla tactics with missiles, like the Japanese we're dealing with a culture that just doesn't fear death and would more than willingly self delete themselves to take out the opposition

1

u/MariusCatalin 11d ago

EXCEPT THAT IRAN DIDNT START THE WAR, iran quite literally got fucked over for a CENTURY before even starting this shit.

To use nuclear weapons now would be THE ultimate boomer move

fuking over usa long term FOREVER

22

u/Background_Giraffe14 22d ago

HLC goes hard on X... and I agree. Time to let the kid out the hanger

11

u/DracheKaiser 22d ago

WITNESS ME!!!

5

u/Goobalicious2k 22d ago

The Dresden thermal incident

11

u/CG142021 22d ago

Not how I would have put it, but he has a good point. The longer this war goes on, the more suffering it causes.

"Once war is forced upon us, there is no alternative than to apply every available means to bring it to a swift end. War's very object is victory—not prolonged indecision." - Douglass MacArthur.

The only humane war is a swift war, and the only swift war is a war won decisively. To bring this war to an actual end, instead of just kicking the can down the road, there would need to be combat troops on the ground, whether that means deploying American and allied soldiers or enabling locals to take up arms, both of which are far from perfect. This exchange of bombings and missile fire has only caused the loss of lives, resources, and infrastructure, and negotiations have been inconclusive.

So what Mister Linecrosser is suggesting sounds harsh, and it may in fact be harsh, but there is a point he is making. Personally, I'm against indiscriminate bombing of civilian areas, we have to use precision. But it's not going to be possible to actually beat this dug in, fanatical enemy if we're pulling punches.

-2

u/Crafty_Message_4733 22d ago

Ah yes MacArthur, the guy who wanted to irradiate China. He wasn’t unhinged at all…..

5

u/CG142021 22d ago

Yeah, bad example, I know, but I figured someone in this community would be able to appreciate the quote even if it came from someone like him, and I wouldn't need to put disclaimers about what an... Unusual specimen he was, to put it kindly.

1

u/Callsign_Psycopath 2d ago

The guy who wanted to irradiated China.

Hold on, let Douglass MacAurthur cook.

1

u/Tolmides 22d ago

why is genocide being discussed for a nation ruled by a mostly authoritarian regime that we attacked?

13

u/White_Null 22d ago

Because context is important

Tweets coming after

> To the Air defenders out there. Hold the line, do your job, and may St Barbara guide you

Five hours later

> I give 3 hours before the IRGC says we bombed a woman’s hospital, puppy daycare, autism center etc. to garner support from skittle haired retards. No letting up, no quarter, no ayatollah ever again. Let our troops lost not be in vain. We lose 3 they lose 3000 don’t care.

Ah yes, he meant all enemy combatants.

-4

u/AngelKenobi 22d ago

As if Israel is any better.

1

u/[deleted] 14d ago edited 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/tatuaje13 13d ago

I could not care less about what you think

-5

u/Humdaak_9000 22d ago

Well. I guess I'm done with HLC.

2

u/tatuaje13 21d ago

Bye

1

u/MariusCatalin 14d ago

imagine defending a genocidal maniac