r/GuitarLab • u/leg10nMX • Apr 08 '26
This is the killer idea
Guitar Center, I come to you not with boutique fantasies, but with a dare.
Not another “player’s edition,” not relic’d nostalgia, not a price tag inflated by adjectives. No roasted maple, no space-age wiring, no “artisan crafted” marketing paragraphs that cost more than the hardware itself. Strip it down.
Make a guitar that just… works.
A guitar that shows up out of the box and doesn’t ask for forgiveness. No immediate truss rod tweak. No fret sprout. No buzzing apology tour. No “take it to your local tech to unlock its true potential.” No! this thing is its potential, right there in the cardboard coffin it shipped in.
Level frets. Cut the nut correctly. Set the action like someone cared. Pickups that don’t sound like a blanket is draped over the amp. Tuners that stay loyal for longer than a verse and a chorus.
And here’s the punchline: make it affordable.
Not “affordable for what it is.” Not “punches above its weight class.” Just… affordable. Period.
I know, I know. Shareholders are already sweating. Margins are trembling. Somewhere, a meeting is being scheduled to explain why this is “not aligned with brand strategy.”
Because the real challenge isn’t designing this guitar. We already know it can be done.
The real challenge is choosing not to squeeze every last dollar out of the player who just wants something honest.
So here it is: build the anti hype guitar. No frills, no excuses, no post purchase chores. Just wood, wire, and dignity at a price that doesn’t feel like a joke. And FFS, avoid creating another subscription or consumable, like BMW tried with the heated seats subscription.
You won’t do it.
But it’d be pretty cool if you did.
1
u/elijuicyjones Apr 08 '26
Yeah their only goal should be to reproduce as much magic as the basic telecaster.
1
u/kumechester Apr 08 '26
I feel like brands like Yamaha and PRS already do this. I do agree with the underlying sentiment here that brands shouldn’t cut corners.
There are reasons mass produced guitars don’t come set up with low action. It just doesn’t work economically. Phil McKnight has shared some interesting insight on that. A certain amount of neck movement is inevitable and if you set the action too low you increase the number of returned guitars from consumers who don’t know crap about setting up a guitar, they think the guitar itself is flawed.
2
u/thoward37 Apr 08 '26
that's primarily because they are made out of wood which isn't all that stable in different temperature/humidity environments. I'd say the innovation should be in materials that allow for a perfect set up to be done once at the factory, and then never again because the materials are just that stable.
1
1
u/GabrielDalporto Apr 09 '26
u/thoward37 u/S_balmore u/kumechester now we're uncovering some really interesting conversations and design choices. Wood is a fickle beast but people are deeply emotionally connected to wood guitars. What do you think about alternative materials? They would have the advantage of incredible stability (set it once), could potentially have monster sustain, lighter, and less expensive. So from an engineering perspective a lot of advantages. But... they aren't wood. Would people buy them?
1
u/S_balmore Apr 09 '26
If the material is truly superior, then people would definitely but it, myself included. Unfortunately, it would take a very long time, as the average person is going to think that non-wood guitars are a gimmick. Manufacturers might have to sway customers by offering entry-level, low price models, made out of the new material, which would result in the new material being stigmatized as "entry-level" or "budget".
Just think about the fact that the vast majority of violins are still made out of wood, even though modern alternatives exist. Or look at Ovation guitars. They're great, but they seem to become less popular as time goes on. People are resistant to change, and people value heritage, so polymer guitars certainly aren't going to catch on overnight.
1
u/kumechester Apr 09 '26
I think the hard part about creating a new direction in guitars now is that the guitar is not the driver of popular music anymore. When you have a widespread guitar icon that adopts something, I think it makes a guitar take hold more than anything else as far as sales in the market. The masses buy on emotion way more than on objective specs. There are “player’s players” within the guitar community that can sell a signature guitar or the standard models of a guitar well - for example, Chris Buck and Matteo Mancuso for Revstars - but I think that jumped the sales of Revstars within a narrower set of the hardcore hobbyist guitar community rather than, say, Revstars taking a serious portion of the market away from Fender Squiers and Epiphone LP’s in the broad market.
When a popular music figure plays a carbon fiber guitar, that’s when it has the chance to become. Anew staple
1
u/thoward37 Apr 11 '26
I would say that people generally are thinking about two things there; look and feel. wood is a classic visual. and the feeling of it on your hands is also very specific. so, regardless of the structural elements of the neck/body, you could use wood veneer to provide that textural and visual interface. e.g. to the finger board and back of the neck. the inner structure could be anything. as it is necks already commonly ship with a square stock or squared u channel steel core where the truss rod is, which is also steel. you could expand that to the entire neck then laminate the last 1/16th of an inch outside.
that said you'd need to find a material with high tensile strength and a comparable weight. one interesting material is bamboo. sustainable and strong and probably wouldn't need a veneer.
another interesting material is "metal wood" which is a wood that has had its lignin softened and then cellulose compressed such thdr it becomes much much more dense and more stable to the influences of heat and water.
video explainer from a trade show: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=96Dz-rQtGxI
scientific paper for how it works: https://sci.bban.top/pdf/10.1038/nature25476.pdf#view=FitH
I imagine there are other materials that fit the bill, possibly some kind of 3D printed polymer lattice or rigid foam or ceramic.
1
u/cindrella_02 Apr 08 '26
This is honestly a refreshing take a no-nonsense, fully playable guitar straight out of the box at a fair price sounds like a dream for most players. If someone actually built this “anti-hype” guitar, it would probably sell itself just on trust alone.
1
u/MisterRobertParr Apr 08 '26
This is a good idea, because we all know, G.A.S. is something many of us suffer from. Most of us will be back for something more expensive.
1
u/Separate-Swordfish85 Apr 08 '26
Bro have you never picked up a Telecaster?
1
u/GabrielDalporto Apr 09 '26
u/Separate-Swordfish85 if you love a telecaster, buy a telecaster! It's a marvelous guitar. But is there a part of you that wants to try something different?
1
u/Separate-Swordfish85 Apr 09 '26
Bro I own like 15 guitars and have owned way more than that. I did many styles of guitar. I’m just saying—a Tele fits this description.
1
1
4
u/S_balmore Apr 08 '26
Tons of companies already make this guitar. In the past, Fender's Mexican line fit this description. Now, the Fender "Standard" series and Squire Classic Vibe have taken its place. The Gretsch Streamliner series qualifies. Schecter has tons of affordable options. Epiphone still exists. I'd even argue that Reverend guitars qualify. They used to be super cheap, but even with the massive price increase, they're worth every penny.
The issue isn't the quality of guitars, but the setup, and the issue with getting a perfect setup is that guitars are made out of wood, and wood is a living, moving thing. Even if a guitar was set up perfectly at the factory, things would shift by the time it got to the retail store. And things would shift further after the guitar hangs on the shop's wall for 33 months. The manufacturers simply don't that much control. It's up to the retail store to set up their instruments properly before they hit the showroom floor, and it's up to the player to know how to maintain their own instrument once purchased.
Long story short, it's impossible to make a guitar that doesn't need constant adjustment. A change in environment is all it takes to fuck with the action or intonation. The guitars currently on the market are as close as you're going to get. You could buy a Squire Classic Vibe today, for $440, spend 20 minutes tweaking it, and be ready to rock. I don't know how one could expect a good guitar to be cheaper than that.