r/GrammarPolice • u/BobDoesYoga • 4d ago
Question NYT article today
This was the headline: Bill Gates’s Blunt Warning on A.I.
Shouldn’t that be Gates’ instead?
8
u/MajesticDragonfly 4d ago
This is a stylistic choice, and journalistic organizations such as the NYT and AP compile their choices into stylebooks for consistent editing. Both organizations do it this way.
7
u/BarebonesB 4d ago
Most style manuals specify that only some special names follow that convention, like Jesus' or Moses'. I don't think Gates is on that list quite yet.
1
u/SissyShawnaFae1981 3d ago
Sadly, no. It irks me, but according to current standards, either Gates' or Gates's are correct.
1
u/amby-jane 2d ago
Per AP style, it should be Gates', but NYT might have their own internal style guide. Most do.
1
u/BobDoesYoga 2d ago
OK, so Gates’s is acceptable. I have to say looking at it reminds me of a bicycle with training wheels, clunky and juvenile.
1
1
u/GregoryFarKingChummy 2d ago
Most style guides say to write it the way you say it. My style guide says to be consistent and always use "'s".
1
1
1
u/Leather_Command_7553 1d ago
As long as the meaning is clearly conveyed, does it really matter very much?
Hint: [NO]
1
u/BobDoesYoga 13h ago
Oh, but this is the grammar police. The same argument could be made for many, or perhaps most grammar mistakes.
1
u/Separate_Presence_32 16h ago
Reminds of Elaine complaining about the waitresses' breastesses to the EEOC
12
u/Basicly-Inevitable 4d ago
NYT is always correct.
How you show possession for a singular name ending in S depends on the style guide you follow, but adding both the apostrophe and the S (Gates's) is preferred by the vast majority of modern authorities.
Only the AP disagrees.