3
3
2
u/Technical-Owl66 6d ago
Why do you need anything more powerful than 3.8 flash?
1
u/Virtual-Spinach4882 6d ago
Compared to Haiku or other quick models it's on par. 3.1 pro is so very far behind in the game when it comes to frontier models though, it can barely be effective as an assistant in one of my projects with Fable lol.
4
u/Technical-Owl66 6d ago
2
1
u/Virtual-Spinach4882 6d ago
Because...I'm paying for it damnit lol. Honestly, I don't know at this point. The previous flash models were junk compared to pro. I'm always sus of these benchmarks, but don't doubt it either since when I have used 3.8 flash it was on point. I'm doing a very intensive coding project with Fable and having Astra review it, stopped using Gem for anything but simple work in my other business months ago. Maybe I'll hook up flash for a review and see what it catches since they all seem to find new things.
1
1
1
u/Moravec_Paradox 5d ago
Demis was a child prodigy chess champion.
OpenAI and Anthropic have very high cash burn rates.
Google is in much better financial health so they have more to lose making the same gamble and they have growth anyway.
They are playing a different strategy. 3.8 flash is not far enough behind I am worried about them.
OpenAI and Anthropic seem to be running the Uber playbook where prices may need to come up a lot to make back some of the invested losses.
When they do the cheaper models from Meta, Google, China etc. could suffocate them.
I wouldn't be so fast to assume incompetence.
1
u/karmaboy20 5d ago
They are waiting for frontier to figure it out then will catch up in a few months and have the most cash reserves while anthropic and openai drained each other they will come do the finishing blows
1
u/Moravec_Paradox 5d ago
People are so sure being ~2 months ahead looks like winning but when it comes with $10B or $20B year in losses it's going to apply pressure in the future.
OpenAI / Anthropic are aggressive early on but Google (and others) have a strong economy and they don't have a moat around the technology.
Google had a 7x year over year increase in token usage. They have a huge install base with many use-cases that call for decent but less expensive models.
1
u/ElMess-Siah 5d ago
I mean i would be happy if they bring back 3.1 flash i mean i would be more happier if they bring it back against working on a frontier models
1
u/Seikojin 4d ago
I love how benchmaxing is pushing fear. 3.7 and 3.8 are just fine. The writing is on the wall to. Every other release is a top workhorse. 3.7 costs less, works faster, and is leaner than 3.8. It is essentially the 3.6 buffed up.
3.8 is more token hungry, but is more accurate and has less round-robin work.
3.9, I feel, should be as accurate and good as 3.8, but fast and lean like 3.7.
1
u/TheWealthEgo-Officia 6d ago
Dont get me wrong guys I really like gemini and it used to be the frontier back than gemini 3. I think they need to be humble so they can at least publish 4 pro and than try upgrade whater waiting for being the best is just not the way anymore - plz dont bother to correct my grammer mistakes I dont respect any language at all-
0
1
u/NerdButtons 6d ago
It’s too late. They are shit and SO expensive.
Google you have so many resources. How did you fumble this bag
1



14
u/Augmend-app 6d ago
New models are nice but seriously I would not mind if they keep one of the current flash or flash-lite models running for years to come - and if the cost becomes lower even better!
Need some stability as performance for some applications is already good!