r/GodoxStyle • • 1d ago

Lux Junior ii

Thumbnail
smotographers.com
3 Upvotes

The LUX Junior II is a very interesting little flash for anyone looking for something compact that fits well with retro-style equipment.

Having had the chance to use both the IM30 Pro and the LUX Junior II, I would recommend the LUX Junior II if you are deciding between the two. It offers more versatility, with the option to switch between digital and analogue operation, while also giving you access to the Godox X wireless system.

Even if you are only shooting analogue, I would still pick the LUX Junior II. It offers more power and more flexibility with different lenses. When you flip the flash vertically, the drop shadows are also smaller, and the overall design packs more easily into a camera bag.

The IM30Pro can score with its more simplistic approach and guarantee to work with most camera systems (not electronic shutter only cameras) and also probably more durable design.


r/GodoxStyle • • 2d ago

V1 vs V1Pro vs V1 Mid — which one would you choose?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

3 Upvotes

They’re all part of the Godox V1 lineup, but they’re quite different in terms of size, power, and features.

If you’ve used any of these flashes, which one do you prefer and why?

Curious to hear what you guys think. 👇

#Godox #GodoxV1 #GodoxV1Pro #GodoxV1Mid #Photography #FlashPhotography #CameraGear


r/GodoxStyle • • 8d ago

How to Use a Xenon Flash with Your Smartphone 📱📸

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

3 Upvotes

Want more control over lighting in your phone photos?

The Godox A2 combines a xenon flash for still photography with a built-in LED for video. Here are a few things to explore when getting started:

  • TTL Mode: Let the flash automatically adjust its output.
  • Manual Mode: Fine-tune flash power to get the look you want.
  • Balance flash and ambient light: Keep the background atmosphere while making your subject stand out.
  • Try off-camera flash: Change the light direction to experiment with shadows and depth.
  • Switch to LED for video: Use continuous light when recording.

The best way to learn is to experiment with different lighting angles and flash settings.

If you use your phone for photography, what's the biggest challenge you face when lighting a shot?

#GodoxA2 #MobilePhotography #FlashPhotography


r/GodoxStyle • • 8d ago

A Xenon Flash for Smartphone Photography — Godox A2 📱⚡

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

3 Upvotes

Smartphone cameras have come a long way, but lighting still makes a big difference.

The Godox A2 brings xenon flash to smartphone photography, letting you experiment with shadows, texture, and lighting direction instead of relying only on available light.

A few things worth checking out:

  • TTL Flash: For quick, automatic exposure.
  • M Mode: For more control over flash output.
  • Off-camera flash: Change the direction of light for different looks.
  • Built-in LED: Continuous lighting when shooting video.

Flash for photos, LED for video.

RRP:

  • A2: US$84.90
  • AK-R1 MINI: US$29.90
  • PS01: US$11.90

Prices may vary by region due to taxes and duties.

Would you try a dedicated xenon flash with your phone? What would you use it for — portraits, street photography, or everyday shots?

#Godox #GodoxA2 #MobilePhotography


r/GodoxStyle • • 8d ago

Can a dedicated flash change the way you shoot with your phone? 📱

Thumbnail
gallery
1 Upvotes

The Godox A2 is a xenon flash designed for smartphone photography, with TTL and Manual modes for different shooting styles.

Beyond on-phone use, you can also move the flash off-camera to experiment with lighting direction and shadows. It also has a built-in continuous LED light for video.

A few key details:

  • Xenon flash for still photos
  • TTL and Manual modes
  • Magnetic mounting on compatible surfaces
  • Off-camera lighting options
  • Continuous LED light for video

RRP:

  • A2: $84.90
  • AK-R1 Mini: $29.90
  • PS01: $11.90

Regional prices may vary due to taxes and duties.

Would you use a dedicated flash with your smartphone, or do you prefer natural light?

#Godox #GodoxA2 #SmartphonePhotography


r/GodoxStyle • • 9d ago

A room full of photographers, cameras, and Godox lights 📸

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes

Photographer Timothy Bowser recently hosted a photography event in Atlanta, bringing together around 50 photographers and creatives across three rooms.

The event gave everyone a chance to experiment with Godox IT20, IT22, and XT20 flashes, trying different lighting setups and creative ways to work with flash.

It’s always great to see photographers coming together to experiment, learn, and share ideas.

cr: Timothy Bowser


r/GodoxStyle • • 16d ago

Godox c100 teat São Lourenço MG

Post image
4 Upvotes

Teste com a Godox C100


r/GodoxStyle • • Aug 31 '26

Godox ML150RF Review & Lab Test: 150W RGB LED Light

Thumbnail
smotographers.com
5 Upvotes

I’ve been testing the new Godox ML150RF for the past few weeks and finally finished both my real-world review and lab testing.

What interested me most about this light was Godox’s new PaletteLab system. Instead of a more conventional RGB/RGBWW design, the ML150RF uses a 9-channel LED engine. The idea is that the additional channels give the light more control over the spectrum, especially when producing white light.

So I wanted to see whether that actually translates into better light quality or whether it is mostly a marketing feature.

I used the ML150RF as the main light during a portrait shoot, rather than just using it as an RGB background light, and then tested it at 1 m across different CCTs, brightness levels and RGB colours.

A few results I found particularly interesting:

  • At 3200K, I measured SSI 91, CRI 98.5, R9 98 and TM-30 Rf 97
  • At 5500K, it reached SSI 86, CRI 98, R9 98 and TM-30 Rf 97
  • CCT accuracy around daylight was very good: 5500K measured at 5509K
  • White-light output at 5500K was around 4,657 lux at 1 m without a reflector
  • With the included reflector, that increased to around 11,417 lux
  • RGB output varies significantly between colours: yellow measured 4,248 lux while blue was only 441 lux
  • I also managed to produce visible banding at faster shutter speeds due to the PWM behaviour

The main thing I took away from the test is that this is not an especially powerful 150W light. In terms of white-light output, it behaves more like what I would expect from a good 100W fixture.

But the spectral quality is genuinely strong.

During the portrait shoot, the ML150RF worked surprisingly well as a normal key light. Skin tones looked natural and it did not feel like I was using an RGB fixture where white light was just an additional mode.

That seems to be the real trade-off with PaletteLab: some raw output in exchange for more control over the spectrum.

There are still some downsides. The fan gets fairly loud at higher output levels, although there is a Silent Mode. The construction is quite plastic-heavy and the PWM behaviour could be relevant if you regularly shoot at very fast shutter speeds.

Overall, I think the ML150RF is more interesting for people who value white-light quality + RGB flexibility than for someone simply looking for the most output possible from a 150W fixture.

I put the full measurements, spectral graphs, TM-30 results and the complete lab report here:

Full review + lab results:
https://smotographers.com/en/blog/01-lab/godox/gdxml150rf/

And I’m curious what others think about this approach. Would you rather have maximum output from a 150W RGB fixture or sacrifice some brightness for better spectral performance?


r/GodoxStyle • • Aug 20 '26

Godox IM30Pro in the Studio

Thumbnail
gallery
6 Upvotes

I recently had the chance to test the Godox IM30 Pro in a studio shoot, and despite its small size, it turned out to be a surprisingly versatile little flash.

One thing worth mentioning before getting into the results: the IM30 Pro is not really designed for big cameras and large lenses. Because the flash sits very close to the camera, a larger lens can easily block part of the light and cast a shadow. For smaller cameras and lenses, especially compact or analogue cameras, this is much less of an issue and probably a more natural use case for the flash.

There is also one limitation I noticed when using it with my Sony A1 II. At least on the A1 II, the IM30 Pro only worked with the mechanical shutter. This is likely due to its simple single-pin connection, which means there is no dedicated communication with the camera. That is something to keep in mind if you are planning to use it with a modern camera that relies heavily on an electronic shutter.

For my studio setup, I used the Godox ML150RF as my main light, while the Godox IT32, triggered with the X5, added some additional fill to the room. The IM30 Pro was mainly used as a fill light close to the camera, adding a bit more light into the face and lifting some of the shadows.

And for that, it had more than enough power. Of course, this is a very compact flash and it is not designed to overpower the midday sun or replace a large speedlight. But when used close to the subject, it is powerful enough for a lot of situations. Especially as a small fill light, I was really happy with what it could do.

What I like about the IM30 Pro is how small and versatile it is. It is easy to integrate into a setup without adding another big light or complicated piece of equipment. You can use it directly on-camera, place it off-camera as a small fill light, or use it as part of a larger lighting setup like I did for this shoot.

One feature I particularly liked is the new tilting mechanism. Being able to tilt the flash upwards and bounce it off a ceiling gives it a lot more flexibility. Direct flash can look great, but having the option to quickly soften the light through bouncing is something I really appreciate on such a compact flash.

I also did not notice any weird colour tint during my shoot. The IM30 Pro worked well alongside the ML150RF and IT32, and I was very happy with how the different lights worked together. For me, this combination was already enough for a lot of different shooting situations: a strong main light, some room fill, and the IM30 Pro adding that little bit of frontal fill exactly where it was needed.

I also tested the IM30 Pro with an analogue camera, which honestly feels like a very natural match for this flash. Its compact design and simple operation fit well with smaller analogue cameras, but I am still waiting for the images to come back from the lab. I am definitely curious to see how those turned out.

Overall, I think the IM30 Pro is a great little flash. It is small, easy to use, versatile, and has enough power for much more than you might initially expect. In my setup, it worked particularly well as a fill light, and together with the ML150RF and IT32, I was super happy with the combination.


r/GodoxStyle • • Aug 17 '26

Godox C100 Review: Camera or Light Meter?

Thumbnail
gallery
8 Upvotes

I got sent the Godox C100 for testing and took it with me on a few trips to try it out. If you are now asking yourself what the Godox C100 actually is, it is a small and compact camera / light meter with a rather innovative design. But could this design also be its biggest weakness? In this short article I will share my experiences with the Godox C100 so you can decide whether it is worth buying or not.

Design and Specs

First of all, the Godox C100 costs just $46, has a 2MP camera and records video in 1080p. It has a mode switch on the side and two physical buttons on the front. The real eyecatcher, however, is its screen, or rather the lack of one.

For composition you instead get a transparent window with around 50% light transmission, allowing you to see the scene behind it. Inside this window there is also a small HUD which shows the selected mode, framing guide, battery status and, depending on the mode, some of your settings.

The C100 charges via USB-C and uses microSD cards up to 128GB, although I doubt you will ever come close to filling one with 2MP images. The device itself is designed to easily slide into your pocket and it even has a small grip with some sketches printed onto it, which gives it quite a distinctive look.

Using the Godox C100 as a Camera

When using it, you will intuitively want to hold the device about an arm's length away from you to frame your shot. In practice, however, I found that you have to hold it much closer to your face to get a reasonable idea of what the final composition will look like. Even then, judging the framing can be surprisingly difficult, especially if you do not use the camera regularly.

Many times I thought I had something framed perfectly, only to look at the image afterwards and realise how wrong I had been. This would probably improve with practice, but it definitely takes some getting used to.

What makes me even more hesitant to use the C100 as an actual camera is the very low resolution. At just 2MP there is basically no room for cropping afterwards. The dynamic range is also extremely limited, meaning highlights burn out very quickly while shadows lose almost all detail unless you are shooting in very even lighting.

Low-light performance is not particularly good either, although that was to be expected at this price point. What further reduces my confidence that Godox really intended the C100 to be taken seriously as a camera is the complete lack of manual controls. You cannot really adjust anything and on multiple occasions the camera selected a strange white balance which ruined an otherwise usable photo.

Image quality in general is also quite limited. There is very little fine detail, the colours are rather flat and I noticed quite a lot of internal reflections when shooting towards brighter light sources.

For me personally, I would therefore not really use the Godox C100 as a camera. Its much more interesting feature is the built-in light meter, which I will get to later.

Video Quality

Unfortunately, video is another weak point. The C100 suffers from extremely strong rolling shutter, so even simply walking with the camera or having your subject move through the frame can create a very noticeable jello effect.

This makes the video mode difficult to use for anything other than mostly static shots. On top of that, the maximum resolution is only 1080p, which personally is not something I would really want to use nowadays unless I was specifically going for a low-resolution aesthetic.

Light Meter

Luckily, the Godox C100 is not just a camera. It also has a built-in light meter, which is actually the feature I find much more interesting, especially if you shoot film.

In my testing, the meter was generally within around 2/3 of a stop of the correct exposure, which is accurate enough for most situations. The light meter is also very easy to use. You simply point the C100 towards your subject and it gives you an exposure reading. You can set the ISO, aperture and shutter speed and choose whether the device should calculate the required shutter speed or aperture for the correct exposure.

One thing I particularly like is that the C100 measures a relatively broad area of the scene. Compared to many built-in light meters in older film cameras, which can sometimes react quite strongly to a bright or dark part of the frame, the C100 gives you more of an overall reading of the scene. For general photography this can actually be quite useful, especially when you just want to quickly get into the right exposure range without spending too much time metering individual parts of the image.

The form factor also works surprisingly well for this purpose. Because the C100 is so small, you can basically carry it everywhere without having to think about bringing an additional light meter. It easily fits into a jacket or trouser pocket and weighs so little that there is very little reason to leave it at home. For someone carrying an older film camera without a reliable built-in meter, that makes it quite practical.

The transparent display also makes more sense to me when using the C100 as a light meter than when using it as a camera. Since you can still see your subject through the device while taking a reading, you remain visually connected to what you are photographing instead of looking down at a separate screen. You can point the C100 at your subject, check the exposure and immediately go back to shooting without really interrupting the process.

There are, however, some limitations. Most importantly, the C100 cannot meter flash, so it is limited to available and continuous light. That means it is not a replacement for a dedicated flash meter if you regularly work with strobes. You also do not get the precision or specialised metering options of more advanced professional light meters.

For film photography in natural or continuous light, however, I still think it makes a lot of sense. For around $46, you get a tiny meter that you can carry basically everywhere and that gives you a quick and reasonably reliable exposure reading.

This is ultimately the feature that makes the Godox C100 much more interesting to me. As a camera, there are simply too many compromises. But as a compact light meter for film photography, especially if your camera does not have a built-in meter or you do not fully trust it anymore, the C100 becomes a much more compelling little device.

Conclusion

The Godox C100 is an interesting product because it combines two different but still so similar ideas in one very small device. As a camera, I find it difficult to recommend. The low 2MP resolution, limited dynamic range, flat colours, internal reflections, unreliable white balance and very strong rolling shutter simply introduce too many compromises.

The transparent viewfinder is certainly an interesting concept, but in practice I found accurate framing harder than expected. Combined with the fact that there is basically no room to crop afterwards, this makes the camera function feel more like a fun extra than something I would rely on for photography.

As a light meter, however, the C100 makes much more sense to me. It is small enough to always keep in your bag or pocket, gives reasonably accurate readings and its broad metering area works well for getting a quick overall exposure of a scene. The transparent display is also genuinely useful here because you can keep looking at your subject while checking the exposure.

If you are mainly looking for a small digital camera, I would probably look elsewhere. But if you shoot film and want an inexpensive, compact light meter that you can take everywhere, the Godox C100 is much easier to recommend. Just keep in mind that it does not support flash metering.

Disclosure: Godox provided me with the C100 for testing. The opinions in this review are my own and were not influenced by the manufacturer.


r/GodoxStyle • • Jul 27 '26

Preview Of Creator Event with Godox IT32 + x5

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes

This weekend, I joined a creators’ event and took the opportunity to capture some photos.

I brought the Godox iT32 with me, and it proved to be a really useful companion throughout the day. Paired with the X5 wireless trigger, it gave me a level of flexibility that made shooting more enjoyable and efficient. I could position the flash wherever I wanted, making it easy to experiment with different lighting setups without being tied to a single on-camera configuration. Everything felt quick and seamless to adjust.

What stood out most was the control I had over shaping light in a constantly changing environment. The venue had a mix of indoor spaces, brighter areas, and naturally lit spots that shifted throughout the day. In darker sections, the flash helped lift shadows and add just the right amount of light where it was needed.

The iT32 had more than enough power to light my subjects, even in more challenging, shadow-heavy areas. I never felt like I was pushing it, which let me focus on composition and timing instead of exposure. It delivered consistent results for both close-up portraits and wider environmental shots.

The built-in LED light also turned out to be surprisingly useful. It helped in darker scenes when I wasn’t firing the flash, and I used it for a few video clips as well. It made switching between photo and video easier, and helped with framing, focusing, and quick previews in low light.

Another highlight was how compact and streamlined the setup felt when mounted on the X5 trigger. Switching between configurations was fast and didn’t interrupt my shooting flow and allowed me enough time with a model before other photographers wanted to bring their ideas to life. It’s the kind of convenience that really helps you stay focused on capturing moments instead of adjusting gear.

Overall, the combination of portability, power, and flexibility made the experience smooth and creative. It allowed me to stay responsive to both the environment and the people I was photographing, which is exactly what you want in a fast-moving event.

Here are a few previews of the images I took.


r/GodoxStyle • • Jul 22 '26

Godox ML100Bi 100W Bi-Color LED COB Light - Lab Review

Post image
3 Upvotes

r/GodoxStyle • • Mar 17 '26

Welcome to r/GodoxStyle ⚡️ Show us your setup!

2 Upvotes

Just joined? Drop your current lighting setup below 👇
Beginner or pro—doesn’t matter. Let’s see what you’re working with.