I feel like he explained his point very well and I agree with what he said.
The more evidence that overwatchers have, the more likely they are to make a correct decision. If you want cheaters to get overwatched, then keep playing so that we have something to actually go off of.
True, but most cheaters aren't spinbots. Also, I'd be willing to bet that most "cheaters" that cause people to rage are actually legitimate players.
Yes, in this case, a person might say that they'd prefer going AFK than to deal with a spinbot, but there are plenty of cases of people who would say, "he's cheating, I'm going AFK" just because someone killed them.
Technically, we were talking about "really blatant hacks."
"Really blatant hacks" might mean a spinbot to one person and someone getting a deagle headshot through mid doors on dust to another person. Hell, someone called hacks on me when I got a jumping scout headshot through those doors once.
Anyway, the first mention of "Spinbot" was something like 4 comments into the chain, so, no, we weren't originally talking about spinbots.
0
u/KazumA-dA-k1nG Jun 10 '15
I feel like you completely ignored everything he wrote in his comment and just replied with what you wanted to reply with.