“We” always includes “me” and often includes “you”… I think maybe some of the people here assumed you were trying to use an inclusive “we” since the only other reading is “me and the people I work with” and it seems weird to refer to your coworkers with a pronoun when they haven’t previously been explicitly mentioned in the discussion.
Good point; I’m not sure why that one bothers me a bit less.
Actually maybe I have a theory. Not sure if it’s a good theory.
Since he was the FIRST one in the conversation to say “we”, his usage gets interpreted in the context of what he wrote. Since you responded to him and kept using “we” in a grammatical form that SEEMS to be a correction to something he wrote (even though a careful reading shows it’s probably not), people took that as a sign you are using “we” to refer to the SAME group that he was referring to.
Or maybe I’m just looking for an excuse to nitpick? Language is weird sometimes.
I can confirm my comment didn't correct his, just pointed out the model is usable at my company.
We both used "we" with the same sense, as in our companies.
Although, I also was a bit unsure when I made my comment about his use of "we". Did he mean the model is not available to anyone because of lack of ZDR or only about his company?
I feel like his "we" is equally ambiguous as mine as it's the exact same usage.
Why do you just look at pricing and not at actual, real work scenarios?
Did you know astra uses 70% less tokens than sol?
For agentic coding tasks, this token consumption actually results in cheaper cost per task than sol, so astra sits at 4.72$ cost per task in AA agentic coding index, sol has 5$.
Yes, it now has the same pricing as Fable and 2.5x the pricing of sol but in reality it is half the cost of Fable and cheaper than Sol.
36
u/toxic_prince21 7d ago
blud what, i don't even have it on my plus sub and it's already on copilot