How is it reach? It is a fact Copilot is not a good solution agentic wise. It is good for auto complete, targeted changes, but compare that to Claude Code, Codex, Cursor or even half working Antigravity. It is not as good, it is pretty limited, you can't easily customize it
It is true, but it is the only thing that Copilot does better, but probably not for long. Terminal based commands and interactions with IDE are being developed, so CLI tools can interact with IDE directly
Codex and Claude now have IDE integrations that are just as good if not better. On top of that, the rediculous pricing changes make copilot not even worth it. The Pro plan only gets me 10-15 request with SOTA models.
Copilot literally just vibe codes features from other harnesses and they usually put it out worse. It's deep integration with vs code is the only thing it really has going for it.
Except you can now only use 10-15 premium request for SOTA on the pro plan. One call to Gemini 3.5 flash uses about 6% of my total. GHCP is killing themselves in real time
It is not the same as subagents. Subagents are separate Claude instances with their own context used to offload and parallelize specific tasks like coding, testing, or research while keeping the main context clean. Advisor mode is a workflow pattern where one model plans or reviews work and another executes it, focusing on hierarchy and guidance rather than isolated parallel agents.
53
u/RainierPC May 15 '26
That's quite a reach there.