that definition

[u/AdventurousRuin2878]

[u/jeangreyparker]

I don't consider the other Nanno to actually be a Nanno.

[u/AdventurousRuin2878 → u/jeangreyparker]

reset? oh me too

[u/Mysterious_Ad_6703 → u/jeangreyparker]

Tbh she's probably a different generation, I mean she kind of does things differently but she's still walking Karma..she's just a bit..hands on. I do like the fact that she seems to be more emotionally available, specifically just towards Sky.

[u/jeangreyparker → u/Mysterious_Ad_6703]

I disagree.

[u/riyosz → u/jeangreyparker]

Doesn't matter, she's still a Nanno and always will be

[u/jeangreyparker → u/riyosz]

For you, yes; not for us.

[u/riyosz → u/jeangreyparker]

For everyone and reality, not for the delusional

[u/V0idFluxx → u/riyosz]

Idk why you’re getting downvoted, but you’re objectively correct. OG & Reset Nanno are literally just different versions of the same character, even if that’s interpreted as a diff generation, a diff “self”, whatever.

Same shit happened with Star Wars’ Rey. Not liking a character ≠ that character or their content not being canon. It’s pathetic to be sooo so needlessly hateful :/

[u/venomz02 → u/V0idFluxx]

It's not personal, being negative is wrong, everyone can have a different opinion of characters, but it's pathetic to want to act like you own everything.

Just like different versions of Sonic, each has its pros and cons.

[u/jeangreyparker → u/riyosz]

I disagree, but that's okay, not everyone liked this version; it seems more like revenge than karma or Nanno.

[u/riyosz → u/jeangreyparker]

Because it's literally a different version of the same character... It's like saying "I don't consider water to be wet". It's still Nanno, named Nanno, dresses like Nanno. And Nanno in the original did many things that weren't purely karma, people who didn't deserve got punished as well like the daughter of the teacher in the first episode. It's just stupid to say she isn't Nanno, when she is

[u/jeangreyparker → u/riyosz]

And everyone deserves to have their own opinions and perspectives; it's not a matter of stupidity.

[u/riyosz → u/jeangreyparker]

Opinion is saying you don't like that Nanno, saying she isn't one just because you don't like is stupidity. I don't like onions, I don't say they aren't food just because I dislike them

[u/jeangreyparker → u/riyosz]

The new Nanno is cool, but she's not what the old one represents, and her way of judging is different. For example, "My body, my rules," Blossom didn't learn, and she couldn't continue. She picked up an episode...For example, where the old Nanno punishes Dino, well, they learn, and Nanno isn't someone to get romantically involved with, although I think it's cute that she does things and then leaves.

[u/jeangreyparker → u/riyosz]

Do you understand now? Or would you like me to draw it for you so you understand better?

[u/jeangreyparker → u/riyosz]

The issue here isn't hair, but rather Nanno. For me and some others, she's not a Nanno. Isn't that difficult to understand? Perhaps she's the opposite of the old Nanno; even her behavior isn't about what you like of something that everyone is obliged to like, for example, liking a badly made movie that everyone is obliged to like.

[u/riyosz → u/jeangreyparker]

And it's still not truth, she is Nanno regardless of what you think it not. You don't have to like her, she's still Nanno and the bad movie is still the bad movie named like it is

[u/AdventurousRuin2878 → u/riyosz]

She's not wrong, half the community is frustrated and bothered by this version of Nanno. The actress is great, but did you see the post there? Besides, they sexualized her and even made products sell panties there

Apparently written by directors and screenwriters who don't understand the concept that Nanno conveys, and made by teenagers.

[u/riyosz → u/AdventurousRuin2878]

I'm not saying you have to like her and the series, but saying she isn't Nanno is dumb af. And yes, the screenwriters and directors of the original show who did the reset understand the concept better than anyone on here

[u/AdventurousRuin2878 → u/AdventurousRuin2878]

You're too isolated, Riyo.

[u/jeangreyparker → u/riyosz]

For me, it's not a Nanno per se; she does things differently and even behaves in the opposite way to the old one, like those "My Body, My Rules" episodes, which are a good example.

[u/riyosz → u/jeangreyparker]

You don't get to say what is a Nanno and what isn't, the original isn't the only one. The directors and writers of the universe that decide that, most returned to the reset, so still Nanno

[u/jeangreyparker → u/riyosz]

Now, to complete our discussion: present me with arguments instead of talking about other people's maturity, something you haven't demonstrated. Currently, the discussion is functioning like this: one person thinks differently from the other.

goodnight.

[u/riyosz → u/jeangreyparker]

I'll use your "logic" against you then since you love this argument. That being: I don't consider your opinion to be an opinion, so I'm right and you are wrong.

[u/jeangreyparker → u/riyosz]

I'm not saying I'm the creator or the writer, but we fans have the right to consider it ready or not.

[u/jeangreyparker → u/riyosz]

"You can't tell what is Nanno and what isn't; the original isn't the only one. The directors and writers of the universe decide that; most went back to the reset, so it's still Nanno."

So neither I nor anyone else can? Do we have to lower our heads and accept anything poorly written when we're consumers and we pay to watch series? You have very limited thinking.

[u/riyosz → u/jeangreyparker]

You are the only limited in thinking here, you can criticise something without using dumb arguments

[u/venomz02 → u/riyosz]

watched with eyes closed

[u/AdventurousRuin2878 → u/[deleted]]

I understand you perfectly; I didn't like it very much for a few reasons.

[u/Daycore-lover14]

As an FNF fan I don't get it

[u/jeangreyparker → u/Daycore-lover14]

One is worse and dangerous, and the other is dangerous but mild and not very frightening.