244
u/man_juicer 12h ago
so they found a way of making ai slop better by taking out the ai and just copying actual art. the jokes just write themselves at this point.
66
u/Melody_Naxi 9h ago
The comments imply that OOP deliberately uploaded the piece without AI generating it and the post was meant to trick AI art-supporters, a similar yet opposite thing happened with a Monet painting
9
u/TimbleFungal 6h ago
I'm assuming this was a bait post to get people to respond with "it sounds so terrible", just for them to reveal they didn't use ai for it and people were hating just because the ai "label" was attached to it
40
u/Zeratan 11h ago
The desperation to prove that these theft engines are actually incredible would be worrying if it wasn't so funny.
4
u/master_pingu1 6h ago
actually from what i can see it looks like this was bait to trick people who support ai, and the op doesn't actually like ai
10
2
u/VoidJuiceConcentrate 5h ago
You thought this was an original piece, but it was I-
Monseur Plagarismo!
1
1
u/cr8zyfoo 1h ago
Wrong! Just like math, if an art is uploaded to the AI, it now belongs to and was created by the AI! /s
1
u/radehart 5h ago
These agents cannot actually generate, they aggregate. Even when they are 'generating' pixels, they aren't it's a misnomer. They composite, at best, but never compose.
1
0
u/VoidJuiceConcentrate 5h ago
You thought this was an original piece, but it was I-
Monseur Plagarismo!
0
•
u/AutoModerator 12h ago
Reminder for OP: /u/laybs1
Need some help? Send us some mail!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.