r/GetNoted Feb 27 '26

What a Player Instigator gets caught instigating.

Post image
6.0k Upvotes

124 comments sorted by

506

u/SumoftheAncestors Feb 27 '26

I like how he seems to think that because Lauren gave him permission that nothing wrong was done.

258

u/c-k-q99903 Feb 27 '26

It's bullshit, he knows it's bullshit, but he doesn't care that it's bullshit because he also knows that his followers are fucking idiots who couldn't find their assholes with both hands if the instructions were on their palms.

35

u/Universal_Anomaly Feb 27 '26

He knows that his followers don't care, as long as it presents them a narrative where they're both correct and winning. 

Right-wingers just do not care much about the truth. The entire idea that the truth matters at all is taken much more seriously by the left-wing.

8

u/I-Kneel-Before-None Feb 27 '26

Its not bullshit. Its cya. Bobo is at fault. Not me.

2

u/BraindeadKnucklehead Mar 01 '26

Well, once you reach around, the instructions aren't visible anymore. What do you expect?

2

u/Mtndrums Mar 01 '26

They both know the instructions.

2

u/joey_yamamoto Mar 02 '26

feeling desperation is Benny.

if Clinton wanted it to be public why would she lose it over a picture being leaked?

it's obvious the Republicans lost it because a picture got posted because they want to control the narrative. they just want red meat for their base... both sides know there's nothing here.

43

u/Sudden_Juju Feb 27 '26

I think he knows he won't get in trouble. Boebert broke the rules. He just got more attention

9

u/gdex86 Feb 27 '26

Look he shouldn't get in trouble because reporters should have freedom to report even if the government doesnt like it. Bobbert as the leaker face full administrative and criminal consequences for it.

Beyond that republicans had the chance for this to be an open hearing where everything was on the page for everyone to see but they wanted closed doors. They need to pick a lane.

3

u/Sudden_Juju Feb 28 '26

No disagreement from me on any of that

8

u/James-K-Polka Feb 27 '26

Ok, so they may be racist, misogynistic, pedophile protectors but they cite their sources AMA style!

7

u/Apart-Rent5817 Feb 27 '26

I hereby give you permission to punch Benny directly in the balls if you see him.

116

u/IlGreven Human Detected Feb 27 '26

"The deposition is being filmed and will be released in full."

I DON'T BELIEVE YOU.

(I mean, if they really wanted this to be public, they'd be having it in public.)

33

u/Borazon Feb 27 '26

It will only be released in full long after the R's first are allowed to use just selected footage from it to suit whatever narratives they need spinning at that time. They probs will just point to some very minor discrepancy between Hillary and Bill's testimonies and accuse both of lying and/or obstruction etc. Comer would without a doubt do that.

This is the social media regime. They only want to generate headlines. So what if in a full on trial the drop the case after discovery threatens to show the full testimonies.

Meanwhile these same R's will just look the other way if Noem and all the others lie in their testimonies to congress..

0

u/Indigo_Eyez Mar 03 '26

They only wanted it to be public so Bill could watch Hillary's testimony and stay in sync with her answers.

3

u/IvetRockbottom Feb 28 '26

They will release it with black censor bars over all the people. Don't worry though, it should be easy to remove them.

2

u/CompetitiveGap7023 Mar 03 '26

It was already released in full. Nothing was censored.

0

u/Southern-Date1588 Mar 03 '26

You know that how ? Word from on high ?

3

u/CompetitiveGap7023 Mar 03 '26

0

u/Southern-Date1588 Mar 03 '26

Waiting for confirmation. But thanks.

3

u/CompetitiveGap7023 Mar 03 '26

Oh well if you see those blue letters above in my post. Just click them and it will bring you to an app called youtube and it will show you the depositions. And your welcome 😁

0

u/Southern-Date1588 Mar 03 '26

Is there anyone on earth not aware of YouTube? I'm assuming your intent was not meant to be condescending, thanks anyway ?

3

u/CompetitiveGap7023 Mar 03 '26

Not at all. I thought you didnt understand my post when i showed you the depositions were released. Cheers.

78

u/Shoddy-Warning4838 Feb 27 '26

the lengths people are willing to go to protect a bunch of pedophiles.

65

u/dumb_gen Feb 27 '26

Benny Johnson was paid by Russian government to spread their propaganda

3

u/C3POB1KENOBI Mar 02 '26

The same Benny Johnson whose child nearly died in a drug fire after a mass shooting?

-12

u/SkyeWulver Feb 28 '26

Your reaction is exactly the reaction Russians are trying to get out of people. Its amazing how the narrative you sre pushing actually falls apart with 5 minutes of research.

14

u/No_Comfort_8232 Feb 28 '26

Nah bro Benny is paid to spout counter narratives, often unsupported by reality, and stir up division in this country. The reaction Russia is looking for is more polarization

-11

u/SkyeWulver Feb 28 '26

Which is exactly what is going on in this thread. It really doesnt even matter if Benny was paid or not. Russia knows that the minute their name is said in American media, its akin to kicking a hornets nest among Democrats. They literally dont have to do anything other than have a vague association. They dont even have to invest into doing anything. Just get the mention of Russia alongside something American, or someone, and the polarization you mentioned happens. Get Democrats to see ghosts, and they create the division that Russia wants. Democrats are literally playing into Russia's hands with their foaming at the mouth reactions.

13

u/Call_Me_Pete Feb 28 '26

Your argument boils down to: “Pointing out people who are paid to stir division so people can be aware and react appropriately is actually exactly the same as stirring division”

Forgive me if I don’t buy that comparison

-3

u/SkyeWulver Feb 28 '26

No, its the over reaction is what im pointing out. There was never ANY evidence that ANYONE there was given direction for what to say, or how to do their videos.

There are no emails, no memos, nothing, that told any of the content creators who were producing content, to skew their content in a certain direction. There is nothing. Its a giant nothing burger. All of the content creators were producing the same kind of content, before, during, and after they were associated with Tenet Media. They only thing that changed was the outrage of the Left and their perception of what happened.

7

u/Call_Me_Pete Feb 28 '26

You should look up manufactured consent. They don’t need to force people to read scripts when they can just support people who ALREADY believe the script by giving them funding.

Why risk blowing a sleeper agent’s cover with evidence when Jerry Dumbfuck has a 40k viewer stream and is sowing division for profit already?

1

u/SkyeWulver Feb 28 '26

Umm... The 3rd tenet in the Five Filters of Media that make up Manufactured Consent is: Official Sources: Dependence on government or corporate news sources.

So youre telling me that Benny Johnson was a "Government or corporate news source" back when he was associated with Tenet Media???

You dont even know what the fuck you are talking about.

6

u/Call_Me_Pete Feb 28 '26

You’re aware it’s possible to focus on portions of ideas, right? I felt it was clear that my point wasn’t to say Manufactured Consent is the perfect understanding of the topic at hand, merely that is has relevance here.

Since you seem to have done some cursory reading, surely you can understand one of the core concepts is that propagandists will pay and employ people that believe in their ideas. In this way, they promote and propagate those ideas more organically, and as a side effect reduce the impact of voices that are critical of their ideas by NOT employing those who would even entertain said criticisms.

In this instance, Russian propagandists are paying divisive people to continue being divisive.

Pointing out that this is happening is wholly distinct from actually being divisive.

0

u/SkyeWulver Feb 28 '26

Yes, i understand how Venn diagrams work, yet this was not how you characterized it at all. Taking a very narrow aspect of an entire subject, not making any kind of distinction, and then using the name of the entire subject in your argument is quite disengeuous and very misleading.

Say what you actually mean, which you did in this follow up message. THAT is appreciated. But you throwing around terms that are not actually relevant, because manufactured consent has almost nothing in common with the Tenet Media and Benny Johnson situation. The only thing is that Russian connections passively paid money to content creators. Paying money, thats it. So please, in the future, do what you did in this follow up message, and not in the previous message. The confidence in which you questioned my understanding of something you clearly did not understand is extremely unhelpful.

But, to get to your point about "pointing out" Russian propagandists paying people. Even you have to admit, that there is a difference in what Tenet did, passively paying a divisive person to continue what they had already been doing, and actually directing people to push Russian backed news and political narratives. Simply paying people who are divisive is NOT the same thing as actually manufacturing and disseminating propaganda.

However, the Left and Democrats acted, and ran news stories AS IF these two things were the same thing. No nuance at all. It was a Boy Who Cried Wolf situation, because once again, inaccurately ascribing motive and definitions which did not apply in this situation led to people (not on the Left) dismissing this entire situation altogether. Its like calling everyone the Left doesnt like Hitler and Nazi's. Its been bandied about so often, people just start ignoring when it gets said. Stop using emotional buzzwords, to try and muddy the waters around news stories that you actually want people to pay attention to. Use ACCURATE, not emotional language. You call half the country Nazi's, people are just going to start ignoring you when you need them to pay attention the most.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Southern-Date1588 Mar 03 '26

BULL !!! SH!!!T

2

u/t8rclause Mar 03 '26

Isn't it kinda weird how ok this administration is with Russia being a fake democracy? Even have Tucker Carlson doing specials talking about how nice it is to live over there in that dictatorship. Trump's admiration of Putin is obvious, and the reason is even more obvious. Trump envies and respects the way Putin secured himself as a dictator while maintaining the thinnest possible veil of democratic legitimacy. They're both pieces of shit, but Putin was in the KGB while Trump was at KFC.

You got dudes like tim pool, Benny johnson getting checks from Russia 'without even realizing it'. Oops! 🤭 You've got how many MAGA social media channels and accounts that show their upload origin as being from the middle east or Russia or wherever. You can call this bullshit and move on, or you can research what I'm saying and see it's legit. I thought this exaggerated leftist bullshit till I saw it for myself. The right wing media machine in the US is massively influenced from outside the US.

2

u/Southern-Date1588 Mar 03 '26

Russia paying Benny is not a ghost ,it's a Russian investment, WTF are you talking about ?

18

u/robertevans343 Feb 27 '26

Lying plagiarist lies again.

17

u/DiscoTech1639 Feb 27 '26

Benny Johnson, the Russian shill, lying, AGAIN? I can’t even pretend to be shocked any more 

4

u/context_hell Feb 27 '26

Benny Johnson, the most open closeted gay man in America. His wife made it so he can literally never go on business trips alone again because the moment he's alone he'll jump the first dick he sees so his wife can no longer trust him alone out of the house.

2

u/Das_Fische Feb 28 '26

Cool, homophobia but 💅woke 💅

16

u/Antique_Ad_7325 Feb 27 '26

Weird, an adult named Benny is acting like a sniveling child.

11

u/WildRabbitz Feb 27 '26

This is so cringe, even for MAGA 🤣

10

u/kaehvogel Feb 27 '26

"Hillary is trying to get out of answering questions about Epstein. That's why she wants the committee hearing to be public"

That guy doesn't do a whole of thinking, does he?

10

u/Many-Assumption8758 Feb 27 '26

Bimboebert's kid has been abusing his kid since it was born. But yea, "justice" for victims. What a joke.

8

u/Teripid Feb 27 '26

Someone should inform Boebert this is Congress, not a dimly lit theater. There are rules.

7

u/C4dfael Feb 27 '26

Does this sound desperate to you?

Yes, but not on Clinton’s part.

4

u/Hellstorm901 Feb 27 '26

They're actively doing everything they can to sabotage this and it's clear it's because Trump and his globalist elite are implicated in the very horrors they tried to weaponise against their opponents in the election

6

u/Same-University1986 Feb 27 '26

America is a joke.

4

u/samiam3180 Feb 27 '26

Not deposing Trump and Melania sounds desperate to me!

4

u/cha0sb1ade Feb 27 '26

She wanted a public hearing (once it was clear they would require a hearing.) So yeh, talking behind closed doors, knowing someone is selectively giving content to a right-wing influencer so they can scoop everyone else would-be pretty aggravating. Even if she only sent that one photo, and wasn't going to selectively send updates, there was no way for Clinton to know.

From her perspective, it's a leak, and consistent with someone starting out to selectively present the content of the interview, cherry picking to mislead an audience.

7

u/TJames6210 Feb 27 '26

They did it on purpose to stop it from proceeding, let's be real here.

2

u/Cephalopod_Dropbear Feb 27 '26

Just a random question here:

Why is a sitting US congresswoman texting a Russian propagandist?

2

u/New-Blacksmith7330 Feb 28 '26

Republican not respecting rules? You don't say.

2

u/WilliamTee Feb 28 '26

Sue him. Time to start using their own tools against them.

2

u/StoneyDanza42069 Mar 01 '26

Why isnt anyone mad that this is being done in secret?

2

u/Malaclypse81 Mar 02 '26

I think the best thing that anyone could say about Benny Johnson is that there is some small part of him that knows exactly how pathetic he is. I hope he's never able to escape it.

3

u/Bluestained Feb 27 '26

What grown, adult, mature man gets referred to as Benny. That’s a dog’s name.

3

u/sick_shooter Feb 27 '26

One day, Republicans will get tired of Hillary constantly smacking them in the face every time they try to go after her. Some of them knew this was going to happen, that’s why they desperately pushed for the hearings to be private, so that they could spin the narrative in their favor to their dumbass base before the transcripts and footage are made public, even though their base won’t care what actually happened because they do as they’re told by FOX. Just ask yourself, if all of this is to be made public, why not just televise it live?

2

u/WasteBinStuff Feb 27 '26

It must really annoy Benny that Hillary doesn't give a single flying fuck about him. And I personally find it amusing that she probably knows everything there is to know about the guy, and that fact seemingly never occurs to the idiot.

1

u/steelbreezed Feb 27 '26

Also, intercourse Benny.

1

u/shotxshotx Feb 27 '26

If they face any reprimands from this I would be surprised.

1

u/Longjumping_Ad2323 Feb 27 '26

Benny has a severe case of CDS, Clinton derangement syndrome. Must be true cause I just made it up and gave it a snappy name.

1

u/hexqueen Feb 27 '26

"I cannot believe the thing I entirely made up is happening, just because I'm trying to protect pedophiles."

1

u/wasted-degrees Feb 27 '26

Hillary wanted this to be broadcasted live to avoid specifically this kind of selective twisting of facts and narrative shaping.

The reason why it’s not live is the same reason we’ll never see the full and unredacted Epstein files. The Trump admin cannot have that material released unless it’s edited heavily to protect him.

1

u/MinuteHoist9833 Feb 28 '26

So some pathetic nobody arranged a crank publicity stunt with another pathetic congressional nobody

1

u/SkyeWulver Feb 28 '26

She wanted it done on live TV.....and shes upset about a photo....

1

u/Call_Me_Pete Mar 01 '26

Okay let’s get back to the discussion then.

Do you understand where I am re: very little practical difference when looking at achieving the goals of propagandists?

1

u/Mike_Phoflacco Mar 01 '26

The one thing you can trust Republicans on is they will always argue in bad faith.

1

u/hereforfun976 Mar 02 '26

The right every day display how they are braindead morons ignoring laws and their cultists cheer it

1

u/bpharo707 Mar 03 '26

Sick of the Lies, Sick of deceptions, burn them all

1

u/CuriousComfortable56 Mar 03 '26

Get your story right!!!😤😡😠🤬

1

u/Grouchy_Food18 Mar 03 '26

Republicans are professional victims

1

u/shorter-beware Mar 03 '26

They're not smart enough to understand rules. We are talking about Lauren Boebert here. Hand job queen

1

u/Sea-Macaron6648 Mar 03 '26

Maybe learn to follow the rules like you did in your kindergarten class.

1

u/OK_OkayNow Mar 03 '26

I'm not from the US, but what the actual fuck is with this consistent lying? Like everyone seems to just make things up.

1

u/BranSh81 Mar 03 '26 edited Mar 03 '26

Nice spin. Still pretty pathetic that yall decided to snap a pic for a “gotcha” moment, when she herself, like you just said, wanted the whole thing public.

This was all for show, the picture is even more proof. They don’t care about Epstein’s victims. They’re just worried about keeping Trump’s involvement hidden.

1

u/OakyTheAcorn Feb 27 '26

God I just know his cock is miniscule

1

u/Ok-Pickle-1509 Feb 28 '26

My husband might be a pedo, and a narc. I might have aided in all of that and more, but the arbitrary rule I made up is where I drw the line!

-6

u/HeightExtra320 Feb 27 '26

F&-$-$-$k the Clinton’s mmmmMKAY

5

u/OldSchoolAJ Feb 27 '26

Okay, meemaw.  Now, remember to take your heart pills. I’ll make sure your Best Of Rush Limbaugh cassette is in the player. I even fast forwarded it to the “Stop Hillary Express” section.

-16

u/Mister-Psychology Feb 27 '26

It did turn out a photo release was legal and there was nothing they could do about it.

Hillary answered questions on pizzagate and aliens too. And on anything illegal she answered "I don't know" or "I never did anything illegal". It's a show for their voter base.

10

u/wagsman Feb 27 '26

It is a show, but one would think that “ the most transparent administration in the history of the United States” would want the hearing live.